The current work investigates the effects of target of perception’s waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) on perceivers’ judgments of sexual unrestrictedness and sexual victimization prototypicality. Studies 1a and 1b found that women with lower WHRs were perceived as relatively more sexually unrestricted. Studies 2a and 2b found that women with lower WHRs were perceived as relatively more prototypic of sexual victimization. Study 3 built on these findings to consider implications for responses to sexual assault disclosures. Perceivers disbelieved and minimized a disclosure of assault relatively more when made by a woman with a higher WHR. In sum, this body of work implicates WHR as a body cue that can inform consequential sexual perception. Thereby, this work identifies factors that could influence judgments of credibility of sexual violence reports, which may have implications for hesitancy to report sexual violence.
AbbeyA.CozzarelliC.McLaughlinK.HarnishR. J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(2), 108–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00304.x
2.
AdolfssonK.StrömwallL. A. (2017). Situational variables or beliefs? A multifaceted approach to understanding blame attributions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(6), 527–552.
AndersonJ. R.HollandE.HeldrethC.JohnsonS. P. (2018). Revisiting the Jezebel stereotype: The impact of target race on sexual objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 461–476.
5.
BarberN. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16(5), 395–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2
6.
BatresC.RussellR.SimpsonJ.CampbellL.HansenA.CronkL. (2018). Evidence that makeup is a false signal of sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.023
7.
BjörntorpP. (1988). Abdominal obesity and the development of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews, 4(6), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmr.5610040607
BodenhausenG. V. (2005). The role of stereotypes in decision-making processes. Medical Decision Making, 25(1), 112–118.
10.
BodenhausenG. V.SchwarzN.BlessH.WänkeM. (1995). Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1003
11.
BoothroydL. G.JonesB. C.BurtD. M.DeBruineL. M.PerrettD. I. (2008). Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.009
12.
BreidingM. J. (2014). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, 63(8), Article 1.
13.
BrewerM. B.DullV.LuiL. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 656–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.656
ChaplinW. F.JohnO. P.GoldbergL. R. (1988). Conceptions of states and traits: Dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.541
16.
ChenJ.WaltersM. L.GilbertL. K.PatelN. (2020). Sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence by sexual orientation, United States. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000252
17.
ClarkA. P. (2004). Self-perceived attractiveness and masculinization predict women’s sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00085-0
18.
CohenC. E. (1981). Person categories and social perception: Testing some boundaries of the processing effect of prior knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.441
19.
DasguptaN.GreenwaldA. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 800–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.800
20.
DeitzS. R.LittmanM.BentleyB. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10(3), 261–280.
21.
DevineS.GermainN.EhrlichS.EppingerB. (2022). Changes in the prevalence of thin bodies bias young women’s judgments about body size. Psychological Science, 33(8), 1212–1225.
22.
DixsonB. J.GrimshawG. M.LinklaterW. L.DixsonA. F. (2010). Watching the hourglass. Human Nature, 21(4), 355–370.
23.
DixsonB. J.GrimshawG. M.LinklaterW. L.DixsonA. F. (2011). Eye-tracking of men’s preferences for waist-to-hip ratio and breast size of women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9523-5
24.
DonovanR. A. (2007). To blame or not to blame: Influences of target race and observer sex on rape blame attribution. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(6), 722–736.
25.
DupreeC. H.KrausM. W. (2022). Psychological science is not race neutral. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 270–275.
26.
EaglyA. H.AshmoreR. D.MakhijaniM. G.LongoL. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but. . .: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
27.
EdmondsE. M.CahoonD. D. (1986). Attitudes concerning crimes related to clothing worn by female victims. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24(6), 444–446. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330577
28.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
29.
FergusonP. A.DuthieD. A.GrafR. G. (1987). Attribution of responsibility to rapist and victim: The influence of victim’s attractiveness and rape-related information. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(3), 243–250.
30.
FiskeL.FallonE. A.BlissmerB.ReddingC. A. (2014). Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among United States adults: Review and recommendations for future research. Eating Behaviors, 15(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.04.010
31.
FowersA.FowersB. (2010). Social dominance and sexual self-schema as moderators of sexist reactions to female subtypes. Sex Roles, 62, 468–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9607-7
32.
FraniukR.SeefeltJ. L.VandelloJ. A. (2008). Prevalence of rape myths in headlines and their effects on attitudes towards rape. Sex Roles, 58(11), 790–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9372-4
33.
FurnhamA.MistryD.McClellandA. (2004). The influence of age of the face and the waist to hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(5), 1171–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00209-5
34.
FurnhamA.SwamiV.ShahK. (2006). Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.007
35.
GarayM. M.RemediosJ. D. (2021). A review of White-centering practices in multiracial research in social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(10), Article e12642.
36.
GerdesE. P.DammannE. J.HeiligK. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19(3–4), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290151
37.
GervaisS. J.HollandA. M.DoddM. D. (2013). My eyes are up here: The nature of the objectifying gaze toward women. Sex Roles, 69(11), 557–570.
38.
GohJ. X.Bandt-LawB.CheekN. N.SinclairS.KaiserC. R. (2021). Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(5), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000260
39.
Goodman-DelahuntyJ.GrahamK. (2011). The influence of victim intoxication and victim attire on police responses to sexual assault. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(1), 22–40.
40.
GovanC. L.WilliamsK. D. (2004). Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by re-defining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.002
41.
HallC.HogueT.GuoK. (2011). Differential gaze behavior towards sexually preferred and non-preferred human figures. Journal of Sex Research, 48(5), 461–469.
42.
HassebrauckM.AronA. (2001). Prototype matching in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(9), 1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279004
43.
HughesS. M.GallupG. G.Jr. (2003). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00149-6
44.
HydeP. (2000). Managing bodies—managing relationships: The popular media and the social construction of women’s bodies and social roles from the 1930s to the 1950s. Journal of Sociology, 36(2), 157–171.
45.
InfangerM.RudmanL.SczesnyS. (2014). Sex as a source of power? Backlash against self-sexualizing women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558312
46.
JaegerB.JonesA. L. (2022). Which facial features are central in impression formation?Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 553–561.
47.
KaiserC. R.Bandt-LawB.CheekN. N.SchachtmanR. (2022). Gender prototypes shape perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(3), 254–261.
48.
KlaverM.De BlokC. J. M.WiepjesC. M.NotaN. M.DekkerM. J.de MutsertR.. . . Den HeijerM. (2018). Changes in regional body fat, lean body mass and body shape in trans persons using cross-sex hormonal therapy: Results from a multicenter prospective study. European Journal of Endocrinology, 178(2), 163–171.
49.
KościńskiK. (2014). Assessment of waist-to-hip ratio attractiveness in women: An anthropometric analysis of digital silhouettes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(5), 989–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0166-1
50.
KossM. P.AbbeyA.CampbellR.CookS.NorrisJ.TestaM.UllmanS.WestC.WhiteJ. (2007). Revising the SES: A collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
51.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(3), 422–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.422
52.
KossM. P.GidyczC. A.WisniewskiN. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.162
53.
KozeeH. B.TylkaT. L.Augustus-HorvathC. L.DenchikA. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual Objectification Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x
54.
LangtonL.BerzofskyM.KrebsC. P.Smiley-McDonaldH. (2012). Victimizations not reported to the police, 2006-2010 (p. 18). US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
55.
LeiR. F.LeshinR. A.RhodesM. (2020). The development of intersectional social prototypes. Psychological Science, 31(8), 911–926.
56.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
57.
LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1994). Rape myths. In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133–164.
58.
LoughnanS.PinaA.VasquezE. A.PuviaE. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases perceived suffering. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313485718
59.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93
60.
MacRaeC. N.ShepherdJ. W. (1989). Sex differences in the perception of rape victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4(3), 278–288.
61.
MaurerT. W.RobinsonD. W. (2008). Effects of attire, alcohol, and gender on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles, 58(5), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9343-9
62.
MazelanP. M. (1980). Stereotypes and perceptions of the victims of rape. Victimology, 5(2–4), 121–132.
63.
McKimmieB. M.MasserB. M.BongiornoR. (2014). What counts as rape? The effect of offense prototypes, victim stereotypes, and participant gender on how the complainant and defendant are perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(12), 2273–2303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513518843
64.
Messman-MooreT. L.BrownA. L. (2006). Risk perception, rape, and sexual revictimization: A prospective study of college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00279.x
65.
Messman-MooreT. L.WalshK. L.DiLilloD. (2010). Emotion dysregulation and risky sexual behavior in revictimization. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(12), 967–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.06.004
66.
MilevaV. R.JonesA. L.RussellR.LittleA. C. (2016). Sex differences in the perceived dominance and prestige of women with and without cosmetics. Perception, 45(10), 1166–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616652053
67.
MindaJ. P.SmithJ. D. (2002). Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.275
68.
MorganR. E.TrumanJ. L. (2019). Criminal victimization, 2018 (NCJ, 253043). Bureau of Justice Statistics.
69.
MuehlenhardC. L.FriedmanD. E.ThomasC. M. (1985). Is date rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men’s attitudes towards women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00882.x
70.
MuehlenhardC. L.ScardinoT. J. (1985). What will he think? Men’s impressions of women who initiate dates and achieve academically. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(4), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.32.4.560
71.
OsbornD. R. (1996). Beauty is as beauty does? Makeup and posture effects on physical attractiveness and judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01837.x
72.
PanZ.KosickiG. M. (1996). Assessing news media influences on the formation of Whites’ racial policy preferences. Communication Research, 23(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023002001
73.
PayneD. L.LonswayK. A.FitzgeraldL. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238
74.
PazhoohiF.LiddleJ. R. (2012). Identifying feminine and masculine ranges for waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 6(2), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099212
75.
PenkeL. (2011). The revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory. In FisherT. D.DavisC. M.YarberW. L.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures, (pp. 622–625). Routledge.
76.
PetskoC. D.BodenhausenG. V. (2020). Multifarious person perception: How social perceivers manage the complexity of intersectional targets. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2), Article e12518.
77.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5), 377–391.
78.
RamasubramanianS. (2011). The impact of stereotypical versus counterstereotypical media exemplars on racial attitudes, causal attributions, and support for affirmative action. Communication Research, 38(4), 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650210384854
79.
ReganP. C. (1996). Sexual outcasts: The perceived impact of body weight and gender on sexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(20), 1803–1815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00099.x
80.
RobertsS. O.Bareket-ShavitC.DollinsF. A.GoldieP. D.MortensonE. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309.
SatchellL. P. (2019). From photograph to face-to-face: Brief interactions change person and personality judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 266–276.
83.
SchullerR. A.McKimmieB. M.MasserB. M.KlippenstineM. A. (2010). Judgments of sexual assault: The impact of complainant emotional demeanor, gender, and victim stereotypes. New Criminal Law Review, 13(4), 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.759
SheltonJ. N. (2000). A reconceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(4), 374–390.
86.
ShermanJ. W.StroessnerS. J.ConreyF. R.AzamO. A. (2005). Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: Attention, attribution, and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.607
87.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes towards positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51(11), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
88.
SigurvinsdottirR.UllmanS. E. (2016). Sexual orientation, race, and trauma as predictors of sexual assault recovery. Journal of Family Violence, 31(7), 913–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9793-8
89.
SimpsonV. J.BrewerG.HendrieC. A. (2014). Evidence to suggest that women’s sexual behavior is influenced by hip width rather than waist-to-hip ratio. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(7), 1367–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0289-z
90.
SinghD. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293
91.
SmithR. E.PineC. J.HawleyM. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 101–112.
92.
SommerS.ReynoldsJ. J.KehnA. (2016). Mock juror perceptions of rape victims: Impact of case characteristics and individual differences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(17), 2847–2866.
93.
StillmanT. F.ManerJ. K. (2009). A sharp eye for her SOI: Perception and misperception of female sociosexuality at zero acquaintance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 124–130.
94.
Stubbs-RichardsonM.RaderN. E.CosbyA. G. (2018). Tweeting rape culture: Examining portrayals of victim blaming in discussions of sexual assault cases on Twitter. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 90–108.
95.
ThorntonB.RyckmanR. M. (1983). The influence of a rape victim’s physical attractiveness on observers’ attributions of responsibility. Human Relations, 36(6), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678303600604
96.
TovéeM. J.MaiseyD. S.EmeryJ. L.CornelissenP. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 266(1415), 211–218.
97.
TownsendJ. M.WassermanT. (1997). The perception of sexual attractiveness: Sex differences in variability. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(3), 243–268.
98.
van der BruggenM.GrubbA. R. (2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.008
99.
WarnerL. R.ShieldsS. A. (2013). The intersections of sexuality, gender, and race: Identity research at the crossroads. Sex Roles, 68(11), 803–810.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
