The literature has widely discussed and supported the relationship between poverty and support for authoritarian leaders and regimes. However, there are different claims about the mediating mechanism and a lack of empirical tests. We hypothesize that the effect of poverty on support for authoritarianism is mediated by shame: People living in poverty frequently experience social exclusion and devaluation, which is reflected in feelings of shame. Such shame, in turn, is likely to increase support for authoritarianism, mainly due to the promise of social re-inclusion. We support our hypothesis in two controlled experiments and a large-scale field study while empirically ruling out the two main alternative explanations offered in the literature: stress and anxiety. Finally, we discuss how the present findings can support policymakers in efficiently addressing the negative political consequences of poverty.
AdornoT.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (2019). The authoritarian personality. Verso. (Original work published 1950)
2.
AllpressJ. A.BrownR.Giner-SorollaR.DeonnaJ. A.TeroniF. (2014). Two faces of group-based shame: Moral shame and image shame differentially predict positive and negative orientations to ingroup wrongdoing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(10), 1270–1284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214540724
3.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
4.
ArielyG.DavidovE. (2011). Can we rate public support for democracy in a comparable way? Cross-national equivalence of democratic attitudes in the World Value Survey. Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 271–286.
5.
BassB. M. (1992). Stress and leadership. In HellerF. A. (Ed.), Decision making and leadership (pp. 133–155). Cambridge University Press.
6.
BernardiR. A. (1994). Validating research results when Cronbach’s alpha is below .70: A methodological procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054003023
7.
BillorN.HadiA. S.VellemanP. F. (2000). BACON: Blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 34(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00101-2
8.
BraderT.MarcusG. E. (2013). Emotion and political psychology. In HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 165–204). Oxford University Press.
9.
BrandtM. J.HenryP. J. (2012). Gender inequality and gender differences in authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449871
10.
BrandtM. J.HenryP. J.WetherellG. (2015). The relationship between authoritarianism and life satisfaction changes depending on stigmatized status. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614552728
11.
BratanovaB.LoughnanS.KleinO.ClaassenA.WoodR. (2016). Poverty, inequality, and increased consumption of high calorie food: Experimental evidence for a causal link. Appetite, 100, 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.028
12.
CarnevaleA. P.SmithN.DražanováL.GulishA.CampbellK. P. (2020). The role of education in taming authoritarian attitudes. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
13.
CarvachoH.ZickA.HayeA.GonzálezR.ManziJ.KocikC.BertlM. (2013). On the relation between social class and prejudice: The roles of education, income, and ideological attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(4), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1961
ConwayL. G.BongardK.PlautV.GornickL. J.DoddsD. P.GiresiT.TweedR. G.RepkeM. A.HouckS. C. (2017). Ecological origins of freedom: Pathogens, heat stress, and frontier topography predict more vertical but less horizontal governmental restriction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(10), 1378–1398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217713192
17.
de HoogeI. E. (2014). The general sociometer shame: Positive interpersonal consequences of an ugly emotion. In LockhartK. G. (Ed.), Psychology of shame: New research (pp. 95–110). Nova Science Publishers.
18.
DotyR. M.PetersonB. E.WinterD. G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978–1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.629
19.
DuckittJ. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791588
20.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x
21.
DuriezB.KlimstraT. A.LuyckxK.BeyersW.SoenensB. (2012). Right–wing authoritarianism: Protective factor against or risk factor for depression?European Journal of Personality, 26(5), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.853
22.
EdelmanM. (2021). Hollowed out heartland, USA: How capital sacrificed communities and paved the way for authoritarian populism. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.045
23.
EkmanP.LevensonR. W.FriesenW. V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, 221(4616), 1208–1210. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6612338
FodorE. M. (1976). Group stress, authoritarian style of control, and use of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.3.313
27.
FreedS.D’AndreaW. (2015). Autonomic arousal and emotion in victims of interpersonal violence: Shame proneness but not anxiety predicts vagal tone. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 16(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2015.1004771
FrommE. (1969). Escape from freedom. Avon Books. (Original work published 1941)
30.
GauselN.VignolesV. L.LeachC. W. (2016). Resolving the paradox of shame: Differentiating among specific appraisal-feeling combinations explains pro-social and self-defensive motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 40(1), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9513-y
31.
GilbertP. (2000). The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: The role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 7(3), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0879(200007)7:3<174::AID-CPP236>3.0.CO;2-U
32.
GladstoneJ. J.JachimowiczJ. M.GreenbergA. E.GalinskyA. D. (2021). Financial shame spirals: How shame intensifies financial hardship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.06.002
33.
GoldbergM. H. (2019). How often does random assignment fail? Estimates and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, Article 101351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101351
34.
GoodbanN. (1985). The psychological impact of being on welfare. Social Service Review, 59(3), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1086/644308
35.
HartmanT. K.StocksT. V. A.McKayR.Gibson-MillerJ.LevitaL.MartinezA. P.MasonL.McBrideO.MurphyJ.ShevlinM.BennettK. M.HylandP.KaratziasT.VallièresF.BentallR. P. (2021). The authoritarian dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects on nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(7), 1274–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620978023
36.
HastingsB. M.ShafferB. (2008). Authoritarianism: The role of threat, evolutionary psychology, and the will to power. Theory & Psychology, 18(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308089793
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
39.
HellhammerJ.SchubertM. (2012). The physiological response to Trier Social Stress Test relates to subjective measures of stress during but not before or after the test. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.05.012
HintonJ. W.RotheilerE.HowardA. (1991). Confusion between stress and state anxiety in a much used self-report “stress” inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(1), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90136-Y
42.
HochschildA. R. (2018). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press.
43.
HornblowA. R.KidsonM. A. (1976). The visual analogue scale for anxiety: A validation study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 10(4), 339–341. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048677609159523
44.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2016). Keep in touch: The effects of imagined touch support on stress and exploration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.04.001
45.
JayS.BatruchA.JettenJ.McGartyC.MuldoonO. T. (2019). Economic inequality and the rise of far-right populism: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2409
46.
KalmijnM.de GraafP. M.UunkW. (2000). ICS occasional papers and document series. Codeboek van het survey Scheiding in Nederland 1998. ICS Code Books.
LaustsenL.PetersenM. B. (2017). Perceived conflict and leader dominance: Individual and contextual factors behind preferences for dominant leaders: Perceived conflict and leader dominance. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12403
49.
LipsetS. (1981). Political man: The social bases of politics. Doubleday. (Original work published 1960)
50.
LundC.BreenA.FlisherA. J.KakumaR.CorrigallJ.JoskaJ. A.SwartzL.PatelV. (2010). Poverty and common mental disorders in low and middle income countries: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 71(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.027
51.
MagalhãesP. C. (2014). Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 53(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12024
52.
MansteadA. S. R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
53.
MarchA. F. (2003). State ideology and the legitimation of authoritarianism: The case of post-Soviet Uzbekistan 1. Journal of Political Ideologies, 8(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310306088
54.
MarcusG. E.ValentinoN. A.VasilopoulosP.FoucaultM. (2019). Applying the theory of affective intelligence to support for authoritarian policies and parties. Political Psychology, 40(Suppl. 1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12571
55.
MarteauT. M.BekkerH. (1992). The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.20448260.1992.tb00997.x
56.
McCannS. J. H. (1999). Threatening times and fluctuations in American church memberships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003005
57.
McCannS. J. H.StewinL. L. (1987). Threat, authoritarianism, and the power of U.S. presidents. The Journal of Psychology, 121(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1987.9712652
58.
MillerS. V.DavisN. T. (2021). The effect of white social prejudice on support for American democracy. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 6, 334–351.
59.
MirisolaA.RoccatoM.RussoS.SpagnaG.VienoA. (2014). Societal threat to safety, compensatory control, and right-wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 35(6), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12048
60.
NanamaS.FrongilloE. A. (2012). Altered social cohesion and adverse psychological experiences with chronic food insecurity in the non-market economy and complex households of Burkina Faso. Social Science & Medicine, 74(3), 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.009
61.
NapierJ. L.JostJ. T. (2008). The “antidemocratic personality” revisited: A cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 595–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.x
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841
64.
ObradovićS.PowerS. A.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ. (2020). Understanding the psychological appeal of populism. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.06.009
OnraetE.Van HielA. (2014). Are right-wing adherents mentally troubled? Recent insights on the relationship of right-wing attitudes with threat and psychological ill-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413514249
67.
OshriO.SheaferT.ShenhavS. R. (2016). A community of values: Democratic identity formation in the European Union. European Union Politics, 17(1), 114–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515608957
68.
PetersG. J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56–69.
69.
PirlottA. G.MacKinnonD. P. (2016). Design approaches to experimental mediation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012
70.
PreacherK. J.KelleyK. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022658
71.
ReeskensT.MuisQ.SiebenI.VandecasteeleL.LuijkxR.HalmanL. (2021). Stability or change of public opinion and values during the coronavirus crisis? Exploring Dutch longitudinal panel data. European Societies, 23(Suppl. 1), S153–S171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1821075
72.
ReicherS.UlusahinY. (2020). Resentment and redemption: On the mobilization of dominant group victimhood. In VollhardtJ. R. (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 275–296). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190875190.003.0013
73.
ReutterL. I.StewartM. J.VeenstraG.LoveR.RaphaelD.MakwarimbaE. (2009). “Who do they think we are, anyway?” Perceptions of and responses to poverty stigma. Qualitative Health Research, 19(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308330246
74.
RuffmanT.WilsonM.HenryJ. D.DawsonA.ChenY.KladnitskiN.MyftariE.MurrayJ.HalberstadtJ.HunterJ. A. (2016). Age differences in right-wing authoritarianism and their relation to emotion recognition. Emotion, 16(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000107
75.
RussoS.MirisolaA.DallagoF.RoccatoM. (2020). Facing natural disasters through the endorsement of authoritarian attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, Article 101412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101412
76.
SafraL.AlganY.TecuT.GrèzesJ.BaumardN.ChevallierC. (2017). Childhood harshness predicts long-lasting leader preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 645–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.05.001
SalesS. M. (1972). Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and nonauthoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(3), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033157
79.
SalesS. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035588
80.
SalesS. M.FriendK. E. (1973). Success and failure as determinants of level of authoritarianism. Behavioral Science, 18(3), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830180304
81.
SalmelaM.von ScheveC. (2017). Emotional roots of right-wing political populism. Social Science Information, 56(4), 567–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018417734419
82.
SandelM. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good?Penguin.
SchoelC.BluemkeM.MuellerP.StahlbergD. (2011). When autocratic leaders become an option—Uncertainty and self-esteem predict implicit leadership preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023393
85.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
SenA. K. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny. Asian Development Bank.
88.
SmithA. (2007). The Wealth of Nations: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Harriman House Limited. (Original work published 1776). https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218
89.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
90.
SprongS.JettenJ.WangZ.PetersK.MolsF.VerkuytenM.BastianB.AriyantoA.AutinF.AyubN.BadeaC.BestaT.ButeraF.Costa-LopesR.CuiL.FantiniC.FinchilescuG.GaertnerL.GollwitzerM.. . . WohlM. J. A. (2019). “Our country needs a strong leader right now”: Economic inequality enhances the wish for a strong leader. Psychological Science, 30(11), 1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619875472
91.
StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15.
Stone-RomeroE. F.RosopaP. J. (2008). The relative validity of inferences about mediation as a function of research design characteristics. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 326–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300342
94.
TangneyJ. P. (1992). Situational determinants of shame and guilt in young adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(2), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292182011
95.
TangneyJ. P.DearingR. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. Guilford Press.
96.
TankardM. E.PaluckE. L. (2016). Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 10(1), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12022
97.
TavakolM.DennickR. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
98.
TeymooriA.BastianB.JettenJ. (2017). Towards a psychological analysis of anomie. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1009–1023.
99.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2006). Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: Support for a theoretical model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1339–1351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206290212
Van HielA.De ClercqB. (2009). Authoritarianism is good for you: Right-wing authoritarianism as a buffering factor for mental distress. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.702
102.
VasilopoulosP.MarcusG. E.FoucaultM. (2018). Emotional responses to the Charlie Hebdo attacks: Addressing the authoritarianism puzzle. Political Psychology, 39(3), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12439
WeberS. (2010). Bacon: An effective way to detect outliers in multivariate data using Stata (and Mata). The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 10(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1001000302
105.
WilsonG. D. (1973). The psychology of conservatism. Academic Press.
106.
YaffeN. M.SolakN.HalperinE.SaguyT. (2018). “Poor is pious”: Distinctiveness threat increases glorification of poverty among the poor. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2342
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
