Transgender women’s access to women-only spaces is controversial. Arguments against trans-inclusive policies often focus on cisgender women’s safety from male violence, despite little evidence to suggest that such policies put cisgender women at risk. Across seven studies using U.S. and U.K. participants (N = 3,864), we investigate whether concerns about male violence versus attitudes toward trans people are a better predictor of support for trans-inclusive policies and whether these factors align with the reasons given by opponents and supporters regarding their policy views. We find that opponents of these policies do not accurately report their reasons for opposition: Specifically, while opponents claim that concerns about male violence are the primary reason driving their opposition, attitudes toward transgender people more strongly predicted policy views. These results highlight the limitations of focusing on overt discourse and emphasize the importance of investigating psychological mechanisms underlying policy support.
AxtJ.ConwayM.WestgateE.ButtrickN. (2020). Implicit transgender attitudes independently predict beliefs about gender and transgender people. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 257–274.
4.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(5), 633–642.
BlackM. C.BasileK. C.BreidingM. J.SmithS. G.WaltersM. L.MerrickM. T.ChenJ.StevensM. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/NISVS_Report2010-a.pdf
7.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 414–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414
8.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. T. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378.
9.
FernbachP. M.HagmayerY.SlomanS. A. (2014). Effort denial in self-deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(1), 1–8.
10.
FiskeS. T.GlickP. (1995). Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organizational change. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 97–115.
11.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
12.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549.
13.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
14.
HasenbushA.FloresA. R.HermanJ. L. (2019). Gender identity nondiscrimination laws in public accommodations: A review of evidence regarding safety and privacy in public restrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16(1), 70–83.
15.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
16.
HowellJ. L.RedfordL.PoggeG.RatliffK. A. (2017). Defensive responding to IAT feedback. Social Cognition, 35, 520–562.
17.
KallaJ. L.BroockmanD. E. (2020). Reducing exclusionary attitudes through interpersonal conversation: Evidence from three field experiments. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 410–425.
18.
KirbyT. A.TabakJ. A.IlacM.CheryanS. (2020). The symbolic value of ethnic spaces. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 867–878.
19.
KoenigA. M.EaglyA. H. (2014). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037215
20.
KrepsT. A.LaurinK.MerrittA. C. (2017). Hypocritical flip-flop, or courageous evolution? When leaders change their moral minds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(5), 730–752.
MorgenrothT.KirbyT. A.ZehnterM.RyanM. K. (2022). Sex wars and TERF wars: Fissures in the feminist movement [Manuscript under review].
23.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.
24.
O’BrienL. T.CrandallC. S.Horstman-ReserA.WarnerR.AlsbrooksA.BlodornA. (2010). But I’m no bigot: How prejudiced White Americans maintain unprejudiced self-images. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 917–946.
PaulhusD. L.BuckelsE. (2012). Classic self-deception revisited. In VazireS.WilsonT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-knowledge (pp.363–378). Guilford Press.
27.
RewL.YoungC. C.MongeM.BoguckaR. (2021). Puberty blockers for transgender and gender diverse youth—A critical review of the literature. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 26(1), 3–14.
SnyderM. L.KleckR. E.StrentaA.MentzerS. J. (1979). Avoidance of the handicapped: an attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(12), 2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2297
VerkuytenM. (2013). Justifying discrimination against Muslim immigrants: Out-group ideology and the five-step social identity model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02081.x
33.
VikiG. T.AbramsD. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.
34.
WestK.HotchinV.WoodC. (2017). Imagined contact can be more effective for participants with stronger initial prejudices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(5), 282–292.
35.
WilsonT. D. (2004). Strangers to ourselves. Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
