Issues in applied survey research, including minimizing respondent burden and ensuring measures’ brevity for smartphone administration, have intensified efforts to create short measures. We conducted two studies on the psychometric properties of single-item satisfaction, love, conflict, and commitment measures. Study 1 was longitudinal, surveying college-age dating couples at three monthly waves (n =121, 84, and 68 couples at the respective waves). Partners completed single- and multi-item measures of the four constructs, along with other variables, to examine test–retest reliability and convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity. Single-item measures of satisfaction, love, and commitment exhibited impressive psychometric qualities, but our single-item conflict measure performed somewhat less strongly. Study 2, a cross-sectional online survey (n = 280), showed strong convergent validity of the single-item measures, including that of conflict.
AjzenI. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 438–459). SAGE.
2.
AllenM. S.IliescuD.GreiffS. (2022). Single item measures in psychological science: A call to action. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699
3.
Al NimaA.CloningerK. M.PerssonB. N.SikströmS.GarciaD. (2020). Validation of subjective well-being measures using item response theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 3036. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03036
4.
AloiaL. S.SolomonD. H. (2015). Conflict intensity, family history, and physiological stress reactions to conflict within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 41, 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12049
5.
AndersonS. R.MillerR. B. (2020). Improving measurement in couple and family therapy: An Item Response Theory primer. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 46, 603–619. http://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12448
6.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2017). IBM® SPSS® Amos™ 25 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation.
7.
ArnettJ. J. (2016). Does emerging adulthood theory apply across social classes? National data on a persistent question. Emerging Adulthood, 4, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815613000
8.
BartonA. W.LavnerJ. A.StanleyS. M.JohnsonM. D.RhoadesG. K. (2020). “Will you complete this survey too?” Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research. Journal of Family Psychology, 34, 8. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000583
9.
BowlingA. (2005). Just one question: If one question works, why ask several?Journal of Epidemiological Community Health, 59, 342–345.
10.
BraikerH.KelleyH. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In BurgessR. L.HustonT. L. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168). Academic Press.
11.
BrooksK. P.Dunkel-SchetterC. (2011). Social negativity and health: Conceptual and measurement issues. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 904–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00395.x
12.
BurgardT.BošnjakM.WedderhoffN. (2020). Response rates in online surveys with affective disorder participants: A meta-analysis of study design and time effects between 2008 and 2019. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 228, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000394
13.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.KaoC. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
14.
CarverC. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92–100.
15.
ChatzitheochariS.FisherK.GilbertE.CalderwoodL.HuskinsonT.ClearyA.GershunyJ. (2018). Using new technologies for time diary data collection: Instrument design and data quality findings from a mixed-mode pilot survey. Social Indicators Research, 137, 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1569-5
16.
ClarkM. S.HirschJ. L.MoninJ. K. (2019). Love conceptualized as mutual communal responsiveness. In SternbergR. J.SternbergK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 84–116). Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-04062-005
17.
DavisK. E.Latty-MannH. (1987). Love styles and relationship quality: A contribution to validation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407587044002
18.
De VriesR. E.RealoA.AllikJ. (2016). Using personality item characteristics to predict single–item internal reliability, retest reliability, and self–other agreement. European Journal of Personality, 30, 618–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2083
19.
DiamantopoulosA.SarstedtM.FuchsC.WilczynskiP.KaiserS. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
20.
DyrenforthP. S.KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B.LucasR. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020385
21.
EdwardsM. C. (2009). An introduction to item response theory using the need for cognition scale. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 507–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00194.x
FinchamF. D.RoggeR.BeachS. R. H. (2018). Relationship satisfaction. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 422–436). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.033
24.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007
25.
FriedmanT. L. (2016). Thank you for being late: An optimist’s guide to thriving in the age of accelerations. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
26.
GeerinckA.AleknaV.BeaudartC.BautmansI.CooperC.De Souza OrlandiF.. . .BruyèreO. (2019). Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies. PLOS ONE, 14(4), Article e0216065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216065
27.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
28.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
29.
HassebrauckM.FehrB. (2002). Dimensions of relationship quality. Personal Relationships, 9, 253–270.
30.
HatfieldE.SprecherS. (1986). Measuring passionate love in intimate relations. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383–410.
31.
HazanC.ShaverP. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
HendrickC.HendrickS. S. (1989). Research on love: Does it measure up?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784–794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.784
34.
HendrickC.HendrickS. S.DickeA. (1998). The Love Attitudes Scale: Short form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598152001
35.
HustonT. L. (1994). Courtship antecedents of marital satisfaction and love. In ErberR.GilmourR. (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 43–65). Lawrence Erlbaum.
36.
HustonT. L.CaughlinJ. P.HoutsR. M.SmithS. E.GeorgeL. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1037//O022-3514.80.2.237
37.
HustonT. L.McHaleS.CrouterA. (1986). “When the honeymoon’s over”: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In DuckS.GilmourR. (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 109–132). Lawrence Erlbaum.
JoelS.EastwickP. W.AllisonC. J.ArriagaX. B.BakerZ. G.Bar-KalifaE.BergeronS.BirnbaumG.BrockR. L.BrumbaughC. C.CarmichaelC. L.ChenS.ClarkeJ.CobbR. J.CoolsenM. K.DavisJ.de JongD. C.DebrotA.DeHaasE. C.. . .WolfS. (2020). Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(32), 19061–19071. https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/07/21/1917036117
40.
JohnsonM. P. (1982). The social and cognitive features of the dissolution of commitment to relationships. In DuckS. (Ed.), Personal relationships: Dissolving personal relationships (pp. 51–73). Academic Press.
41.
KennyD.KashyD. A.CookD. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
42.
KleinH. J.CooperJ. T.MolloyJ. C.SwansonJ. A. (2014). The assessment of commitment: Advantages of a unidimensional, target-free approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034751
43.
KliemS.ForanH. M.BellerJ.HahlwegK.Stöbel-RichterY.BrählerE. (2015). Dimensional latent structure of relationship quality: Results of three representative population samples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1190–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12211
44.
KohnM. A.SenyakJ. (2020). Sample size calculators. University of California, San Francisco, Clinical & Translational Science Institute. https://www.sample-size.net/
45.
LeeJ. A. (1973). The colors of love: An exploration of the ways of loving. New Press.
46.
LinkM. W.MurphyJ.SchoberM. F.BuskirkT. D.ChildsJ. H.TesfayeC. L. (2014). Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys: Executive summary of the AAPOR Task Force on Emerging Technologies in Public Opinion Research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu054
47.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.CaiL. (2006). Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 11, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.19
48.
MavletovaA.CouperM. P. (2015). A meta-analysis of breakoff rates in mobile web surveys. In ToninelliD.PinterR.de PedrazaP. (Eds.), Mobile research methods: Opportunities and challenges of mobile research methodologies (pp. 81–98). Ubiquity Press.
49.
MercerA.CaporasoA.CantorD.TownsendR. (2015). How much gets you how much? Monetary incentives and response rates in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu059
50.
NiehuisS.AdamczykK.TrepanowskiR.CelejewskaA.FrydrysiakA.ReifmanA.Willis-GrossmannE. (2021). Development of the Polish-Language Relationship Disillusionment Scale and its validation. Personal Relationships, 28, 1017–1041. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12394
51.
NiehuisS.BartellD. (2006). The Marital Disillusionment Scale: Development and psychometric properties. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 69–84.
52.
NiehuisS.LeeK.-H.ReifmanA.SwensonA.HunsakerS. (2011). Idealization and disillusionment in intimate relationships: A review of theory, method, and research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3, 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00100.x
53.
NiehuisS.ReifmanA.Al-KhalilK.OldhamR.FangD.O’BoyleM.DavisT. (2019). Functional magnetic resonance imaging activation in response to prompts of romantically disillusioning events. Personal Relationships, 26, 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12272
54.
NiehuisS.ReifmanA.FengD.HustonT. (2016). Courtship progression rate and declines in expressed affection early in marriage: A test of the disillusionment model. Journal of Family Issues, 37, 1074–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14540159
55.
NiehuisS.ReifmanA.LeeK. H. (2015). Disillusionment in cohabiting and married couples: A national study. Journal of Family Issues, 36, 951–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13498594
56.
NiehuisS.SkograndL.HustonT. L. (2006). When marriages die: Premarital and early marital precursors to divorce. The Forum for Family and Consumer Issues, 11(1), 1–7.
57.
OgolskyB. G.SurraC. A.MonkJ. K. (2016). Pathways of commitment to wed: The development and dissolution of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12260
58.
ParkY.ImpettE. A.MacDonaldG. (2021). Generalizability of results from dyadic data: Participation of one versus two members of a romantic couple is associated with breakup likelihood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220920167
59.
PreacherK. J. (2006). Testing complex correlational hypotheses with structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 520–543. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1304_2
60.
PreacherK. J.CoffmanD. L. (2006, May). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. http://www.quantpsy.org.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
63.
RolstadS.AdlerJ.RydénA. (2011). Response burden and questionnaire length: Is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value in Health, 14, 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003
64.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
65.
RubinZ. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029841
66.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternative, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
67.
RyanR. M.PatrickH.DeciE. L.WilliamsG. C. (2008). Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. European Health Psychologist, 10, 2–5.
68.
SabatelliR. M. (1988). Measurement issues in marital research: A review and critique of contemporary survey instruments. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 891–915.
69.
SchoenfeldE. A.BredowC. A.HustonT. L. (2012). Do men and women show love differently in marriage?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1396–1409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212450739
70.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
71.
SchummW. R.Paff-BergenL. A.HatchR. C.ObiorahF. C.CopelandJ. M.MeensL. D.BugaighisM. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/352405
72.
SmythJ. M.JuthV.MaJ.SliwinskiM. (2017). A slice of life: Ecologically valid methods for research on social relationships and health across the life span. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, Article e12356. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12356
73.
SprecherS. (1999). “I love you more today than yesterday”: Romantic partners’ perceptions of changes in love and related affect over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.46
74.
StanleyS. S.MarkmanH. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/353245
TigheJ.McManusI.DewhurstN. G.ChisL.MucklowJ. (2010). The standard error of measurement is a more appropriate measure of quality for postgraduate medical assessments than is reliability: An analysis of MRCP (UK) examinations. BMC Medical Education, 10, Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-40
77.
TwengeJ. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super—connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.
78.
WhistonS. C. (2017). Principles and applications of assessment in counseling (5th ed.). Cengage.
79.
WillsT.WeissR.PattersonG. (1974). A behavioral analysis of the determinants of marital satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 42, 802–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037524
80.
ZacchilliT. L.HendrickC.HendrickS. S. (2009). The romantic partner conflict scale: A new scale to measure relationship conflict. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1073–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509347936
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
