What are the effects of reading fiction? We propose that literary fiction alters views of the world through its presentation of difference—different minds, different contexts, and different situations—grounding a belief that the social world is complex. Across four studies, two nationally representative and one preregistered (total n = 5,176), we find that the reading of literary fiction in early life is associated with a more complex worldview in Americans: increased attributional complexity, increased psychological richness, decreased belief that contemporary inequalities are legitimate, and decreased belief that people are essentially only one way. By contrast, early-life reading of narrative fiction that presents more standardized plots and characters, such as romance novels, predict holding a less complex worldview.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.
2.
AdrianJ. E.ClementeR. A.VillanuevaL.RieffeC. (2005). Parent–child picture-book reading, mothers’ mental state language and children’s theory of mind. Journal of Child Language, 32, 673–686.
BargerM. M.WormingtonS. V.HuettelL. G.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2016). Developmental changes in college engineering students’ personal epistemology profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 1–8.
5.
BastianB.HaslamN. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 228–235.
6.
BlackJ. E.BarnesJ. L. (2015). The effects of reading material on social and non-social cognition. Poetics, 52, 32–43.
7.
CampagnaD.CapernaG.MontaltoV. (2020). Does culture make a better citizen? Exploring the relationship between cultural and civic participation in Italy. Social Indicators Research, 149, 657–686.
CheungB. Y.ChudekM.HeineS. J. (2011). Evidence for a sensitive period for acculturation: Younger immigrants report acculturating at a faster rate. Psychological Science, 22, 147–152.
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
11.
D’AgataJ. (2016). The making of the American essay. Graywolf Press.
12.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
13.
DevineP. G. (1989). Overattribution effect: The role of confidence and attributional complexity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 149–158.
14.
Dodell-FederD.TamirD. I. (2018). Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 147(11), 1713–1727.
15.
DowrickC.BillingtonJ.RobinsonJ.HamerA.WilliamsC. (2012). Get into reading as an intervention for common mental health problems: Exploring catalysts for change. Medical Humanities, 38(1), 15–20.
16.
FletcherG. J. O.DanilovicsP.FernandezG.PetersonD.ReederG. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 875–884.
17.
FongK.MullinJ. B.MarR. A. (2013). What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376.
18.
FuchsB. (2004). Romance. Routledge.
19.
GaspardH.WilleE.WormingtonS. V.HullemanC. S. (2019). How are upper secondary school students’ expectancy-value profiles associated with achievement and university STEM major? A cross-domain comparison. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 149–162.
20.
HakemulderJ. (2000). The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept (vol. 34). John Benjamins.
21.
HallJ. A.GohJ. X.MastM. S.HagedornC. (2016). Individual differences in accurately judging personality from text. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 433–445.
22.
HarzewskiS. (2011). Chick lit and postfeminism. University of Virginia Press.
23.
HorhotaM.Blanchard–FieldsF. (2006). Do beliefs and attributional complexity influence age differences in the correspondence bias?Social Cognition, 24(3), 310–337.
24.
JeannotteM. S. (2003). Singing alone? The contribution of cultural capital to social cohesion and sustainable communities. The International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9(1), 35–49.
25.
KiddD. C.CastanoE. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380.
26.
KiddD. C.CastanoE. (2017). Different stories: How levels of familiarity with literary and genre fiction relate to mentalizing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(4), 474–486.
27.
KrentzJ. A. (1992). Dangerous men and adventurous women: Romance writers on the appeal of romance. University of Pennsylvania Press.
28.
LearyM. R.DiebelsK. J.DavissonE. K.Jongman-SerenoK. P.IsherwoodJ. C.RaimiK. T.. . .HoyleR. H. (2017). Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 793–813.
29.
LichtermanP. (1992). Self-help reading as a thin culture. Media, Culture & Society, 14(3), 421–447.
30.
MarR. A. (2018a). Stories and the promotion of social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 257–262.
31.
MarR. A. (2018b). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 454–479.
32.
MarR. A.OatleyK. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192.
33.
MarR. A.TackettJ. L.MooreC. (2010). Exposure to media and theory-of-mind development in preschoolers. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.11.002
34.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.TrautweinU.MorinA. J. S. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of Person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(2), 191–225.
35.
MehlS.LandsbergM. W.SchmidtA. C.CabanisM.BechdolfA.HerrlichJ.. . .KommescherM. (2014). Why do bad things happen to me? Attributional style, depressed mood, and persecutory delusions in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(6), 1338–1346.
36.
MirraN. (2018). Educating for empathy: Literacy learning and civic engagement. Teachers College Press.
37.
ModleskiT. (1982). Loving with a vengeance. Mass-produced fantasies for women. Routledge.
38.
MooreM.GordonP. C. (2015). Reading ability and print exposure: Item response theory analysis of the author recognition test. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1095–1109.
39.
MorganM.ShanahanJ. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 20(1), 1–45.
40.
MumperM. L.GerrigR. J. (2017). Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(12), 1718–1729.
43.
OishiS.ChoiH.ButtrickN.HeintzelmanS. J.KushlevK.WestgateE. C.. . .NgB. W. (2019). The psychologically rich life questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 257–270.
44.
PaneroM. E.WeisbergD. S.BlackJ.GoldsteinT. R.BarnesJ. L.BrownellH.WinnerE. (2016). Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54.
45.
PoerioG.TotterdaleP. (2020). The effect of fiction on the well-being of older adults: A longitudinal RCT intervention study using audiobooks. Psychosocial Intervention, 29(1), 29–38.
46.
RadwayJ. A. (1984). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. The University of North Carolina Press.
47.
RandjbarS.VeckenstedtR.VitzthumF.HottenrottB.MoritzS. (2011). Attributional biases in paranoid schizophrenia: Further evidence for a decreased sense of self-causation in paranoia. Psychosis, 3(1), 74–85.
48.
RegisP. (2003). A natural history of the romance novel. University of Pennsylvania Press.
49.
ReidL. D.FoelsR. (2010). Cognitive complexity and the perception of subtle racism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 291–301.
50.
SaundersG. (2021). A swim in a pond in the rain: In which four Russians give a master class on writing, reading, and life. Random House.
StanovichK. E.CunninghamA. E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 51–68.
53.
TrillingL. (1950). The liberal imagination: Essays on literature and society. Viking Press.
54.
WestgateE. C.OishiS. (2021). Art, music, and literature: Do the humanities make our lives richer, happier, and more meaningful? In TayL.PawelskiJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the positive humanities (pp. 85–96). Oxford University Press.
WoodJ. (2008). How fiction works. Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
57.
ZunshineL. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Ohio State University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
