Previous research has argued that a growing multiracial population will blur boundaries between racial groups, reducing racism and improving interracial relations. However, this is unlikely to happen if multiracial groups are judged according to their proximity to Whiteness. We examined how having White ancestry shapes status perceptions of multiracial groups. Studies 1 and 2 showed that multiracial groups with White ancestry (e.g., Black/White) are considered higher status than dual minority multiracial (e.g., Black/Latinx) and monoracial minority (e.g., Black) groups. Study 3 revealed that multiracial groups with White ancestry are perceived as more competent and warmer than monoracial minority and dual minority multiracial groups, leading to higher status perceptions for multiracial groups with White ancestry. Thus, multiracial people, like other racial minorities, may be judged according to White, Eurocentric standards. The results imply that, without anti-racist intervention, the treatment of multiracial people will reinforce, rather than challenge, the existing racial hierarchy.
AbeleA. E.CuddyA. J. C.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1063–1065.
2.
AdlerN.StewartJ. (2007). The MacArthur scale of subjective status. MacArthur Research Network on SES & Health.
3.
BassS. (2001). Policing space, policing race: Social control imperatives and police discretionary decisions. Social Justice, 28(1), 156–176.
4.
BellD. A.Jr. (1980). Comment, Brown v. Board of education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93, 518–533.
5.
BellM. P.HarrisonD. A.McLaughlinM. E. (1997). Asian American attitudes toward affirmative action in employment: Implications for the model minority myth. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(3), 356–377.
6.
Ben-ZeevA.DennehyT. C.GoodrichR. I.KolarikB. S.GeislerM. W. (2014). When an “educated” Black man becomes lighter in the mind’s eye: Evidence for a skin tone memory bias. Sage Open, 4(1), 1–9.
7.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.
8.
BlairI. V.JuddC. M.FallmanJ. L. (2004). The automaticity of race and Afrocentric facial features in social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 763–778.
9.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2004). From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(6), 931–950.
10.
BouchardM. E. (2020). Scaling proximity to whiteness: Racial boundary-making on São Tomé Island. Ethnography. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138120967373
11.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324.
12.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550–558.
13.
CrenshawK.GotandaN.PellerG.ThomasK. (Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 276–291). The New Press.
14.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
15.
CundiffJ. M.SmithT. W.UchinoB. N.BergC. A. (2013). Subjective social status: Construct validity and associations with psychosocial vulnerability and self-rated health. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20(1), 148–158.
16.
de Santana PinhoP. (2009). White but not quite: Tones and overtones of whiteness in Brazil. Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism, 13(2), 39–56.
17.
DixonT. L.MaddoxK. B. (2005). Skin tone, crime news, and social reality judgments: Priming the stereotype of the dark and dangerous black criminal 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(8), 1555–1570.
18.
DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination, 80, 3–28.
19.
EberhardtJ. L.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386.
20.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
21.
FiskeS. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357–411). McGraw-Hill.
22.
FiskeS. T. (2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 941–982). John Wiley & Sons.
23.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.
24.
FiskeS. T.DupreeC. H.NicolasG.SwencionisJ. K. (2016). Status, power, and intergroup relations: The personal is the societal. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 44–48.
25.
FiskeS. T.XuJ.CuddyA. C.GlickP. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 473–489.
26.
GaitherS. E.PaukerK.SlepianM. L.SommersS. R. (2016). Social belonging motivates categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Social Cognition, 34(2), 97–118.
27.
GaitherS. E.ToosiN. R.BabbittL. G.SommersS. R. (2019). Exposure to biracial faces reduces colorblindness. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 54–66.
28.
GallagherC. A. (2007). White. In VeraH.FeaginJ. R. (Eds.), Handbooks of the sociology of racial and ethnic relations (pp. 9–14). Springer US.
29.
GansH. J. (2012). “Whitening” and the changing American racial hierarchy. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 9(2), 267–279.
30.
GarayM. M.RemediosD. J. (2021). A review of White-centering practices in multiracial research in social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(10), Article e12642.
31.
GiattiL.do Valle CameloL.de Castro RodriguesJ. F.BarretoS. M. (2012). Reliability of the MacArthur scale of subjective social status-Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1–7.
32.
GoodmanE.AdlerN. E.KawachiI.FrazierA. L.HuangB.ColditzG. A. (2001). Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: Development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), e31–e31.
33.
GreenM. J.SonnC. C.MatsebulaJ. (2007). Reviewing whiteness: Theory, research, and possibilities. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(3), 389–419.
34.
HartiganJ. (1997). Establishing the fact of whiteness. American Anthropologist, 99(3), 495–505.
35.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451–470.
36.
HernándezT. K. (2017). Racially-mixed personal identity equality. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 16(3), 354–364.
37.
HinzmanL.MaddoxK. B. (2017). Conceptual and visual representations of racial categories: Distinguishing subtypes from subgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 95–109.
38.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.LevinD. T.BanajiM. R. (2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 492–506.
39.
HoxJ. J.MaasC. J. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(2), 157–174.
40.
KaoL. S.GreenC. E. (2008). Analysis of variance: Is there a difference in means and what does it mean?Journal of Surgical Research, 144(1), 158–170.
41.
KawaiY. (2005). Stereotyping Asian Americans: The dialectic of the model minority and the Yellow Peril. Howard Journal of Communications, 16(2), 109–130.
42.
KimC. J. (1999). The racial triangulation of Asian Americans. Politics & Society, 27(1), 105–138.
43.
KunstJ. R.DovidioJ. F.DotschR. (2018). White look-alikes: Mainstream culture adoption makes immigrants “look” phenotypically white. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(2), 265–282.
44.
LevinsonJ. D.YoungD. (2009). Different shades of bias: Skin tone, implicit racial bias, and judgments of ambiguous evidence. West Virginia Law Review, 112, 307–350.
45.
MaddoxK. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 383–401.
46.
MatsudaM. (1996). We will not be used: Are Asian Americans the racial bourgeoisie. In MatsudaM. (Ed.), Where is your body? And other essays on race, gender, and the law (pp. 149–159). Beacon.
47.
McNeishD. (2017). Small sample methods for multilevel modeling: A colloquial elucidation of REML and the Kenward-Roger correction. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(5), 661–670.
OldmeadowJ.FiskeS. T. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status=competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1135–1148.
50.
OmiM.WinantH. (1994). Racial formation in the US: From the 1960s to the 1990s. Routledge.
51.
OreopoulosP. (2011). Why do skilled immigrants struggle in the labor market? A field experiment with thirteen thousand resumes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(4), 148–171.
52.
OsajimaK. (2005). Asian Americans as the model minority: An analysis of the popular press image in the 1960s and 1980s. A Companion to Asian American Studies, 1(1), 215–225.
53.
OsborneD.DaviesP. G. (2013). Eyewitness identifications are affected by stereotypes about a suspect’s level of perceived stereotypicality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(4), 488–504.
54.
PaukerK.CarpinellaC.MeyersC.YoungD. M.SanchezD. T. (2018). The role of diversity exposure in Whites’ reduction in race essentialism over time. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 944–952.
55.
PaukerK.XuY.WilliamsA.BiddleA. M. (2016). Race essentialism and social contextual differences in children’s racial stereotyping. Child Development, 87(5), 1409–1422.
56.
Pew Research Center. (2015). Multiracial in America: Proud, diverse and growing in numbers. Pew Research Center.
57.
PlousS. (2003). The psychology of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination: An overview. In PlousS. (Ed.), Understanding prejudice and discrimination (pp. 3-48). McGraw-Hill.
58.
PreacherK. J.ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(2), 161–182.
59.
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.
60.
ReichelP. L. (1988). Southern slave patrols as a transitional police type. American Journal of Police, 7, 51–78.
61.
RichesonJ. A.SommersS. R. (2016). Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 439–463.
62.
RockquemoreK. A.BrunsmaD. L.DelgadoD. J. (2009). Racing to theory or retheorizing race? Understanding the struggle to build a multiracial identity theory. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 13–34.
63.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371.
64.
SaenzV. B.PonjuanL. (2009). The vanishing Latino male in higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8(1), 54–89.
65.
SanchezD. T.GoodJ. J.ChavezG. (2011). Blood quantum and perceptions of Black White biracial targets: The Black ancestry prototype model of affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 3–14.
66.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance theory: A new synthesis. In SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (Eds.), Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression (pp. 31–58). Cambridge University Press.
67.
SpencerR. (2014). “Only the news they want to print”: Mainstream media and critical mixed-race studies. Journal of Critical Mixed Race Studies, 1(1), 162–182.
68.
SquiresC. R. (2007). Dispatches from the color line: The press and multiracial America. SUNY Press.
69.
StangorC.JostJ. T. (1997). Commentary: Individual, group and system levels of analysis and their relevance for stereotyping and intergroup relations. In SpearsR.OakesP. J.EllemersN.HaslamS. A. (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 336–358). Blackwell Publishing.
70.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype competition and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.
71.
SueD. W.BucceriJ.LinA. I.NadalK. L.TorinoG. C. (2007). Racial microaggressions and the Asian American experience. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 72–81.
72.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.AustinW. G.WorchelS. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational Identity: A Reader, 56(65), 9780203505984–9780203505916.
73.
TraskH. K. (1999). From a native daughter: Colonialism and sovereignty in Hawaii (Revised ed.). University of Hawaii Press.
VinluanA. C.HinzmanL.MaddoxK. B.RemediosJ. D. (in preparation). Who is prototypical of the Black/White multiracial group? Examining mental representations of multiracial targets.
76.
WilkinsC. L.KaiserC. R.RieckH. (2010). Detecting racial identification: The role of phenotypic prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1029–1034.
77.
YoungD. M.SanchezD. T.WiltonL. S. (2013). At the crossroads of race: Racial ambiguity and biracial identification influence psychological essentialist thinking. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(4), 461–467.
78.
ZellE.StrickhouserJ. E.KrizanZ. (2018). Subjective social status and health: A meta analysis of community and society ladders. Health Psychology, 37(10), 979–987.
79.
ZouL. X.CheryanS. (2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
