Building on theories explaining social outcomes of economic inequality, our research examined the psychological impact of inequality on the desire for wealth and status. Our studies provide both experimental (Studies 1 and 3, Ns = 321 and 596) and correlational (Study 2; N = 141,477 from 73 countries and regions) evidence that higher inequality heightens people’s desire for wealth and status. Notably, this effect of inequality on desire is independent of the influence of societal wealth. Moreover, our results reveal social class differences in why inequality fuels motivations: Lower-class individuals are more likely to respond to higher inequality with a heightened desire reflecting self-improvement concerns, whereas upper-class individuals are more likely to respond with a heightened desire reflecting social comparison concerns. These findings suggest that higher inequality creates an environment of restlessness in which both the poor and the rich feel obliged to seek wealth and status, albeit for different reasons.
AlvaredoF.ChancelL.PikettyT.SaezE.ZucmanG. (2018). World inequality report 2018. World Inequality Lab. https://wir2018.wid.world/
2.
AndersenR.CurtisJ. (2012). The polarizing effect of economic inequality on class identification: Evidence from 44 countries. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.01.002
3.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
4.
BelmiP.LaurinK. (2016). Who wants to get to the top? Class and lay theories about power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000060
5.
BolT.LanceeB.SteijnS. (2014). Income inequality and gambling: A panel study in the United States (1980–1997). Sociological Spectrum, 34(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2014.857196
BrandtM. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status–legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031751
8.
Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LundbergK. B.KayA. C.PayneB. K. (2015). Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science, 26(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614553947
9.
ButtrickN. R.OishiS. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3), Article e12304. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12304
10.
ChambersJ. R.SwanL. K.HeesackerM. (2014). Better off than we know: Distorted perceptions of incomes and income inequality in America. Psychological Science, 25(2), 613–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504965
11.
CoburnD. (2015). Income inequality, welfare, class and health: A comment on Pickett and Wilkinson, 2015. Social Science & Medicine, 146, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.002
12.
ConnorP.VarneyJ.KeltnerD.ChenS. (2021). Social class competence stereotypes are amplified by socially signaled economic inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916640
13.
CorakM. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.79
14.
CôtéS.HouseJ.WillerR. (2015). High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(52), 15838–15843. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511536112
15.
EasterbrookM. J.KuppensT.MansteadA. S. R. (2020). Socioeconomic status and the structure of the self-concept. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12334
16.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
GreitemeyerT.SagioglouC. (2017). Increasing wealth inequality may increase interpersonal hostility: The relationship between personal relative deprivation and aggression. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(6), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1288078
19.
HeisermanN.SimpsonB. (2017). Higher inequality increases the gap in the perceived merit of the rich and poor. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272517711919
20.
HoxJ. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Routledge.
21.
InglehartR.HaerpferC.MorenoA.WelzelC.KizilovaK.Diez-MedranoJ.LagosM.NorrisP.PonarinE.PuranenB. (2005–2008). World Values Survey: Round five country-pooled datafile version. JD Systems Institute. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5.jsp
22.
InglehartR.HaerpferC.MorenoA.WelzelC.KizilovaK.Diez-MedranoJ.LagosM.NorrisP.PonarinE.PuranenB. (2010–2014) . World Values Survey: Round six country-pooled datafile version. JD Systems Institute. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
23.
JettenJ.MolsF.SelvanathanH. P. (2020). How economic inequality fuels the rise and persistence of the yellow vest movement. International Review of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.356
24.
JettenJ.MolsF.SteffensN. K. (2021). Prosperous but fearful of falling: The wealth paradox, collective angst, and opposition to immigration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220944112
JettenJ.PetersK.ÁlvarezB.CasaraB. G. S.DareM.KirklandK.Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.SelvanathanH. P.SprongS.TanjitpiyanondP.WangZ.MolsF. (2022). Consequences of economic inequality for the social and political vitality of society: A social identity analysis. Political Psychology, 42(S1), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12800
27.
JettenJ.WangZ.SteffensN. K.MolsF.PetersK.VerkuytenM. (2017). A social identity analysis of responses to economic inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.011
28.
KrausM. W.ParkJ. W.TanJ. J. X. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616673192
29.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028756
30.
LayteR.WhelanC. T. (2014). Who feels inferior? A test of the status anxiety hypothesis of social inequalities in health. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu057
31.
LoughnanS.KuppensP.AllikJ.BalazsK.de LemusS.DumontK.GargurevichR.HidegkutiI.LeidnerB.MatosL.ParkJ.RealoA.ShiJ.SojoV. E.TongY-yVaesJ.VerduynP.YeungV.HaslamN. (2011). Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417003
32.
LynchJ. W.SmithG. D.KaplanG. A.HouseJ. S. (2000). Income inequality and mortality: Importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions. BMJ, 320, Article 1200. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1200
MolsF.JettenJ. (2017). The wealth paradox: Economic prosperity and the hardening of attitudes. Cambridge University Press.
35.
NorthM. S.FiskeS., T. (2014). Social categories create and reflect inequality: Psychological and sociological insights. In ChengJ. T.TracyJ. L.AndersenR. (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 243–265). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_12
PaskovM.GërxhaniK.van de WerfhorstH. G. (2017). Giving up on the Joneses? The relationship between income inequality and status-seeking. European Sociological Review, 33(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw052
38.
PayneB. K.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.HannayJ. W. (2017). Economic inequality increases risk taking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18), 4643–4648. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616453114
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
41.
RambottiS. (2015). Recalibrating the spirit level: An analysis of the interaction of income inequality and poverty and its effect on health. Social Science & Medicine, 139, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.026
42.
ScheepersD. (2017). Intergroup status differences as challenge or threat: The role of legitimacy. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215595108
43.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
44.
SchwartzS. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
45.
SprongS.JettenJ.WangZ.PetersK.MolsF.VerkuytenM.BastianB.AriyantoA.AutinF.AyubN.BadeaC.BestaT.ButeraF.Costa-LopesR.CuiL.FantiniC.FinchilescuG.GaertnerL.GollwitzerM.. . . WohlM. J. A. (2019). “Our country needs a strong leader right now”: Economic inequality enhances the wish for a strong leader. Psychological Science, 30(11), 1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619875472
46.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Brooks/Cole.
47.
TanjitpiyanondP.JettenJ.PetersK. (2021). How economic inequality shapes social class stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, Article 104248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104248
48.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
49.
United Nations. (2021). Solidarity “missing in action,” Secretary-General tells General Assembly, decrying “malady of mistrust” while stressing: “we must get serious.”https://www.un.org/press/en/2021/sgsm20918.doc.htm
50.
Van de WerfhorstH. G.SalverdaW. (2012). Consequences of economic inequality: Introduction to a special issue. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(4), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.08.001
51.
WalasekL.BrownG. D. A. (2015). Income inequality and status seeking: Searching for positional goods in unequal U.S. states. Psychological Science, 26(4), 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567511
52.
WalasekL.BrownG. D. A. (2019). Income inequality and social status: The social rank and material rank hypotheses. In JettenJ.PetersK. (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 235–248). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_15
53.
WangZ.JettenJ.SteffensN. K. (2020). The more you have, the more you want? Higher social class predicts a greater desire for wealth and status. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2620
54.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2010a). Poverty or inequality?. In WilkinsonR.PickettK. (Eds.), The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone (pp. 15–30). Penguin Books.
55.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2010b). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. Penguin Books.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2018b). The inner level: How more equal societies reduce stress, restore sanity and improve everyone’s well-being. Penguin Books.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
