Perceiving roles as fulfilling goals offers motivational benefits to students, and yet the features of individuals or contexts that align with seeing such role opportunities have not been studied systematically. The current research investigated how these goal affordances are related to proactive mindset or a person’s belief that they can shape their contexts. Three studies examined how variation in proactivity aligns with perceiving more communal and agentic goal opportunities in roles. Study 1 found that highly proactive college students (vs. less proactive students) tended to perceive their future careers as fulfilling communal and agentic goals, which predicted positive career attitudes. Study 2 replicated this association, while ruling out behavioral flexibility as accounting for the proactivity–positivity relationship. Study 3 experimentally tested whether growth-oriented contexts foster proactivity. Proactive mindset aligns with more expansive views of roles as fulfilling fundamental motives. These views, in turn, carry positive implications for one’s future career attitudes.
AllenJ. M.SmithJ. L.ThomanD. B.WaltersR. W. (2018). Fluctuating team science: Perceiving science as collaborative improves science motivation. Motivation Science, 4(4), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000099
2.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Rand McNally.
3.
BatemanT. S.CrantJ. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
4.
BelangerA. L.DiekmanA. B.SteinbergM. (2017). Leveraging communal experiences in the curriculum: Increasing interest in pursuing engineering by changing stereotypic expectations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(6), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12438
5.
BelangerA. L.JoshiM. P.FuestingM. A.WeisgramE. S.ClaypoolH. M.DiekmanA. B. (2020). Putting belonging in context: Communal affordances signal belonging in STEM. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219897181
6.
BrownE. R.SmithJ. L.ThomanD. B.AllenJ. M.MuragishiG. (2015). From bench to bedside: A communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ biomedical science motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1116–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000033
7.
BrownE. R.ThomanD. B.SmithJ. L.DiekmanA. B. (2015). Closing the communal gap: The importance of communal affordances in science career motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45(12), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12327
8.
CanningE. A.MurphyM. C.EmersonK. T. U.ChatmanJ. A.DweckC. S.KrayL. J. (2020). Cultures of genius at work: Organizational mindsets predict cultural norms, trust, and commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(4), 626–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219872473
9.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
10.
CrantJ. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462.
11.
DiekmanA. B.BrownE. R.JohnstonA. M.ClarkE. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342
12.
DiekmanA. B.ClarkE. K.JohnstonA. M.BrownE. R.SteinbergM. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025199
13.
DiekmanA. B.EaglyA. H.JohnstonA. M. (2010). Social structure. In DovidioJ. F.HewstoneM.GlickP.EssesV. M. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 209–224). SAGE.
14.
DiekmanA. B.JoshiM. P.Benson-GreenwaldT. M. (2020). Goal congruity theory: Navigating the social structure to fulfill goals. In GawronskiB. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 62, pp. 189–244). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.003
15.
DiekmanA. B.SteinbergM.BrownE. R.BelangerA. L.ClarkE. K. (2017). A goal congruity model of role entry, engagement, and exit: Understanding communal goal processes in STEM gender gaps. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(2), 142–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316642141
16.
DweckC. S. (1999). Essays in social psychology. Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
17.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success (pp. x, 276). Random House.
18.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In Van LangeP.KruglanskiA.HigginsE. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
19.
EmersonK. T. U.MurphyM. C. (2015). A company I can trust? Organizational lay theories moderate stereotype threat for women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214564969
20.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
21.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
22.
FiskeS. (2003). Five core social motives, plus or minus five. In SpencerS. J.FeinS.ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 9, pp. 237–246). Erlbaum.
23.
FuestingM. A.DiekmanA. B.BoucherK. L.MurphyM. C.MansonD. L.SaferB. L. (2019). Growing STEM: Perceived faculty mindset as an indicator of communal affordances in STEM. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000154
24.
FullerB.MarlerL. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008
25.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how: Mini meta-analysis. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(10), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
26.
HarackiewiczJ. M.SansoneC. (1991). Goals and intrinsic motivation: You can get there from here. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 7, 21–49.
27.
JacksonP. R.WallT. D.MartinR.DavidsK. (1993). New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 753–762.
28.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
29.
KimT.-Y.HonA. H. Y.CrantJ. M. (2009). Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9094-4
30.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557
31.
MartinM. M.AndersonC. M. (1998). The cognitive flexibility scale: Three validity studies. Communication Reports, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219809367680
32.
MartinM. M.RubinR. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623–626.
33.
MurphyM. C.DweckC. S. (2010). A culture of genius: How an organization’s lay theory shapes people’s cognition, affect, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209347380
34.
NormanJ.FuestingM. A.GeerlingD.M.ChenJ. M.GableS.DiekmanA. B. (2021). To pursue or not to pursue STEM? Faculty behavior enhances student involvement in STEM roles by signaling role-specific support. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211035003
35.
ParkerS.SpriggC. A. (1999). Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.925
36.
ParkerS.WallT. D.JacksonP. R. (1997). “That’s not my job”: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 899–929. https://doi.org/10.5465/256952
37.
ParkerS.WilliamsH. M.TurnerN. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
SchneiderM. C.HolmanM. R.DiekmanA. B.McAndrewT. (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition. Political Psychology, 37(4), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12268
40.
SearsD. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 515–530.
41.
SeibertS. E.CrantM. J.KraimerM. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416
42.
SnibbeA. C.MarkusH. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 703–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.703
43.
SteinbergM.DiekmanA. B. (2018). Considering “why” to engage in STEM activities elevates communal content of STEM affordances. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.010
44.
StephensN. M.TownsendS. S. M.DittmannA. G. (2018). Social-class disparities in higher education and professional workplaces: The role of cultural mismatch. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418806506
45.
StephensN. M.TownsendS. S. M.MarkusH. R.PhillipsL. T. (2012). A cultural mismatch: Independent cultural norms produce greater increases in cortisol and more negative emotions among first-generation college students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1389–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.008
46.
TalleyA. E.KocumL.SchlegelR. J.MolixL.BettencourtB. A. (2012). Social roles, basic need satisfaction, and psychological health: The central role of competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432762
47.
ThomanD. B.MuragishiG. A.SmithJ. L. (2017). Research microcultures as socialization contexts for underrepresented science students. Psychological Science, 28(6), 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617694865
48.
TolentinoL. R.GarciaP. R. J. M.LuV. N.RestubogS. L. D.BordiaP.PlewaC. (2014). Career adaptation: The relation of adaptability to goal orientation, proactive personality, and career optimism. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.11.004
49.
YeagerD. S.WaltonG. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 267–301. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311405999
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
