Five experiments investigate the hypothesis that heavier weight individuals are denied mental agency (i.e., higher order cognitive and intentional capacities), but not experience (e.g., emotional and sensory capacities), relative to average weight individuals. Across studies, we find that as targets increase in weight, they are denied mental agency; however, target weight has no reliable influence on ascriptions of experience (Studies 1a–2b). Furthermore, the de-mentalization of heavier weight targets was associated with both disgust and beliefs about targets’ physical agency (Study 3). Finally, de-mentalization affected role assignments. Heavier weight targets were rated as helpful for roles requiring experiential but not mentally agentic faculties (Study 4). Heavier weight targets were also less likely than chance to be categorized into a career when it was described as requiring mental agency (versus experience; Study 5). These findings suggest novel insights into past work on weight stigma, wherein discrimination often occurs in domains requiring mental agency.
AgerströmJ.RoothD. O. (2011). The role of automatic obesity stereotypes in real hiring discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021594
2.
AltN. P.LickD. J.HungerJ. M.JohnsonK. L. (2019). Evaluative implications of intersecting body weight and other social categories: The role of typicality. Body Image, 31, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.08.004
3.
BrodskyC. M. (1954). A study of norms for body form-behavior relationship. Anthropological Quarterly, 27, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3316929
4.
BrowningR. C.KramR. (2005). Energetic cost and preferred speed of walking in heavier-weight vs. normal weight women. Obesity Research, 13, 891–899. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2005.103
5.
BuckelsE. E.TrapnellP. D. (2013). Disgust facilitates outgroup dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212471738
6.
CostelloK.HodsonG. (2014). Explaining dehumanization among children: The interspecies model of prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12016
7.
CraigB. M.MallanK. M.LippO. V. (2012). The effect of poser race on the happy categorization advantage depends on stimulus type, set size, and presentation duration. Emotion, 12, 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028622
8.
CrandallC. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.882
9.
CrandallC. S. (1995). Do parents discriminate against their heavyweight daughters?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295217007
10.
CrandallC. S.D’AnelloS.SakalliN.LazarusE.NejtardtG. W.FeatherN. T. (2001). An attribution-value model of prejudice: Anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201271003
DeskaJ. C.AlmarazS. M.HugenbergK. (2017). Of mannequins and men: Ascriptions of mind in faces are bounded by perceptual and processing similarities to human faces. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616671404
13.
DeskaJ. D.HugenbergK. (2017). The face-mind link: Why we see minds behind faces, and how others’ minds change how we see their faces. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 11, Article e12361. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12361
14.
EpleyN.WaytzA. (2010). Mind perception. Handbook of Social Psychology, 5, 498–541.
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
GervaisS. J.VescioT. K.FörsterJ.MaassA.SuitnerC. (2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1890
18.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12267
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013748
21.
GreenleafC.WeillerK. (2005). Perceptions of youth obesity among physical educators. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-0662-9
HaslamN. (2014). What is dehumanization? In BainP. G.VaesJ.LeyensJ.-P. (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 34–48). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203110539-8
HeblM. R.KleckR. E. (2002). Acknowledging one’s stigma in the interview setting: Effective strategy or liability?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00214.x
26.
HimmelsteinM. S.PuhlR. M.QuinnD. M. (2017). Intersectionality: An understudied framework for addressing weight stigma. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53, 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.04.003
27.
HimmelsteinM. S.PuhlR. M.QuinnD. M. (2019). Overlooked and understudied: Health consequences of weight stigma in men. Obesity, 27, 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22599
28.
HuY.PardeC. J.HillM. Q.MahmoodN.O’TooleA. J. (2018). First impressions of personality traits from body shapes. Psychological Science, 29, 1969–1983. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799300
29.
Incollingo RodriguezA. C. I.WhiteM. L.StandenE. C.MannT.WellsC. R.JanetA. (2018). Body mass index and educational inequality: An update of Crandall (1995). Stigma and Health, 4, 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000149
30.
KenneyE. L.GortmakerS. L.DavisonK. K.AustinS. B. (2015). The academic penalty for gaining weight: A longitudinal, change-in-change analysis of BMI and perceived academic ability in middle school students. International Journal of Obesity, 39, 1408–1413. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.88
31.
KozakM. N.MarshA. A.WegnerD. M. (2006). What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/e633942013-754
32.
KunstJ. R.KteilyN.ThomnsenL. (2017). “You little creep”: Evidence of blatant dehumanization of short groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617740613
33.
LeyensJ. P.DemoulinS.VaesJ.GauntR.PaladinoM. P. (2007). Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 139–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00006.x
34.
LoughnanS.HaslamN.SuttonR. M.SpencerB. (2014). Dehumanization and social class: Animality in the stereotypes of “white trash,” “chavs,” and “bogans.”Social Psychology, 41, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000159
MontoyaA. K.HayesA. F. (2017). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22, 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000086
37.
NutterS.AlbergaA. S.MacInnisC.EllardJ. H.Russell-MayhewS. (2018). Framing obesity a disease: Indirect effects of affect and controllability beliefs on weight bias. International Journal of Obesity, 42, 1804–1811. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0110-5
38.
ParkJ. H.SchallerM.CrandallC. S. (2007). Pathogen-avoidance mechanisms and the stigmatization of heavier-weight people. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 410–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.008
39.
PearlR. L.PuhlR. M.LessardL.HimmelsteinM. S.FosterG. D. (2021). Prevalence and correlates of weight bias internalization in weight management: A multinational study. SSM-population Health, 13, Article 100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100755
40.
PhelanS. M.BurgessD. J.YeazelM. W.HellerstedtW. L.GriffinJ. M.van RynM. (2015). Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity. Obesity Reviews, 16, 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12266
41.
PuhlR. M.AndreyevaT.BrownellK. D. (2008). Perceptions of weight discrimination: Prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.22
PuhlR. M.LatnerJ. D.O’BrienK.LuedickeJ.DaníelsdóttirS.ForhanM. (2015). A multinational examination of weight bias: Predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries. International Journal of Obesity, 39, 1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.32
44.
UenoT.FastrichG. M.MurayamaK. (2016). Meta-analysis to integrate effect sizes within an article: Possible misuse and type I error inflation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000159
45.
VaesJ.PaladinoP.PuviaE. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 774–785. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.824
46.
VartanianL. R. (2010). Disgust and perceived control in attitudes toward heavier-weight people. International Journal of Obesity, 34, 1302–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2014.11.007
47.
VartanianL. R.NovakS. A. (2011). Internalized societal attitudes moderate the impact of weight stigma on avoidance of exercise. Obesity, 19, 757–762. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2010.234
48.
VartanianL. R.TrewarthaT.VanmanE. J. (2016). Disgust predicts prejudice and discrimination toward individuals with obesity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12370
49.
WaytzA.GrayK.EpleyN.WegnerD. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
