We examined within-person relationships among daily events, emotion regulation strategies, and well-being in daily life. Each day for 2 to 3 weeks, participants in two studies (total N = 445) reported the extent to which they reappraised and suppressed their positive and negative emotions, the types of events they experienced, and their well-being. Using multilevel modeling, we found that the extent to which people reappraised positive and negative emotions and suppressed negative emotions was positively related to the number/importance of daily positive events, whereas the suppression of positive emotions was negatively related. Furthermore, the positive relationships between well-being and reappraisal of positive and negative emotions and the suppression of negative emotions were stronger as the number of negative events increased. These results demonstrate that most emotion regulation strategies are employed when the day is going well but are most beneficial for people’s well-being when the day is not going well.
AffleckG.ZautraA.TennenH.ArmeliS. (1999). Multilevel daily process designs for consulting and clinical psychology: A preface for the perplexed. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 746–754.
2.
AldaoA.Nolen-HoeksemaS.SchweizerS. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.
3.
AmrheinV.GreenlandS.McShaneB. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567, 305–307.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
5.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
6.
BransK.KovalP.VerduynP.LimY. L.KuppensP. (2013). The regulation of negative and positive affect in daily life. Emotion, 13(5), 926–939.
7.
BrockmanR.CiarrochiJ.ParkerP.KashdanT. (2017). Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: Mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 46(2), 91–113.
8.
ButlerA. C.HokansonJ. E.FlynnH. A. (1994). A comparison of self-esteem liability and low trait self-esteem as vulnerability factors for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 166–177.
9.
ButlerE. A.EgloffB.WilhelmF. H.SmithN. C.EricksonE. A.GrossJ. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3(1), 48–67.
10.
EnglishT.JohnO. P.SrivastavaS.GrossJ. J. (2012). Emotion regulation and peer-rated social functioning: A 4-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 780–784.
11.
FarmerA. S.KashdanT. B. (2012). Social anxiety and emotion regulation in daily life: Spillover effects on positive and negative social events. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 41(2), 152–162.
12.
Feldman BarrettL.RussellJ. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 967–984.
13.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ElliotA. J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1135–1149.
14.
GreenP.MacLeodC. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498.
15.
GrossJ. J. (2015a). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26(1), 1–26.
16.
GrossJ. J. (2015b). Handbook of emotion regulation. Guilford Publications.
17.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.
18.
GrossJ. J.LevensonR. W. (1997). Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106(1), 95–103.
19.
HainesS. J.GleesonJ.KuppensP.HollensteinT.CiarrochiJ.LabuschagneI.… KovalP. (2016). The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being. Psychological Science, 27, 1651–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616669086
20.
HeiyJ. E.CheavensJ. S. (2014). Back to basics: A naturalistic assessment of the experience and regulation of emotion. Emotion, 14(5), 878–891.
21.
KalokerinosE. K.RésiboisM.VerduynP.KuppensP. (2017). The temporal deployment of emotion regulation strategies during negative emotional episodes. Emotion, 17(3), 450–458.
22.
KalokerinosE. K.TamirM.KuppensP. (2017). Instrumental motives in negative emotion regulation in daily life: Frequency, consistency, and predictors. Emotion, 17(4), 648–657.
23.
KashdanT. B.StegerM. F. (2006). Expanding the topography of social anxiety: An experience-sampling assessment of positive emotions, positive events, and emotion suppression. Psychological Science, 17(2), 120–128.
24.
KooleS. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cognition & Emotion, 23(1), 4–41.
25.
KreftI. G. G.de LeeuwJ. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. SAGE.
26.
KrompingerJ. W.MoserJ. S.SimonsR. F. (2008). Modulations of the electrophysiological response to pleasant stimuli by cognitive reappraisal. Emotion, 8(1), 132–137.
27.
LakensD.ScheelA. M.IsagerP. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269.
28.
MaasC. J.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92.
29.
McGrathJ. E. (1982). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. In McGrathJ. E.MartinJ.KulkaR. A. (Eds.), Judgment calls in research (pp. 69–102). SAGE.
30.
McRaeK.MaussI. B. (2016). Increasing positive emotion in negative contexts: Emotional consequences, neural correlates, and implications for resilience. In GreeneJ. D.MorrisonI.SeligmanM. E. P. (Eds.), Positive neuroscience (pp. 159–174). Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977925.003.0011
31.
MeadeA. W.CraigS. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455.
32.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
33.
NewmanD. B.StoneA. A. (2019). Understanding daily life with ecological momentary assessment. In KardesF.HerrP. M.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in consumer psychology (pp. 259–275). Routledge.
34.
NezlekJ. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 771–785.
35.
NezlekJ. B. (2005). Distinguishing affective and non-affective reactions to daily events. Journal of Personality, 73(6), 1539–1568.
36.
NezlekJ. B. (2011). Multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology [SAGE library of methods in social and personality psychology]. SAGE. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287996
NezlekJ. B. (2017). A practical guide to understanding reliability in studies of within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 149–155.
39.
NezlekJ. B.KuppensP. (2008). Regulating positive and negative emotions in daily life. Journal of Personality, 76(3), 561–580.
40.
NezlekJ. B.PleskoR. M. (2001). Day-to-day relationships among self-concept clarity, self-esteem, daily events, and mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 201–211.
41.
NezlekJ. B.RusanowskaM.HolasP.KrejtzI. (2017). Positive daily experiences can buffer the negative effects of daily stress: A conceptual replication. Journal of Research in Personality, 71, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.09.002
42.
OishiS.DienerE.ChoiD.-W.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiI. (2007). The dynamics of daily events and well-being across cultures: When less is more. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 685–698.
43.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. SAGE.
44.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CongdonR. (2011). HLM 7 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
45.
RichardsJ. M.GrossJ. J. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 410–424.
46.
RightsJ. D.SterbaS. K. (2019). Quantifying explained variance in multilevel models: An integrative framework for defining R-squared measures. Psychological Methods, 24(3), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000184
SaloveyP.MayerJ. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211.
49.
SchwarzN. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22–42). Guilford Press.
50.
SeidlitzL.DienerE. (1993). Memory for positive versus negative life events: Theories for the differences between happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 654–663.
51.
ShiffmanS.StoneA. A.HuffordM. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32.
52.
StepperS.StrackF. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 211–220.
53.
StoneA. A.KesslerR. C.HaythomthwatteJ. A. (1991). Measuring daily events and experiences: Decisions for the researcher. Journal of Personality, 59, 575–607. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00260.x
54.
StrackF.MartinL. L.StepperS. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768–777.
55.
TamirM. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 199–222.
56.
TroyA. S.FordB. Q.McRaeK.ZaroliaP.MaussI. B. (2017). Change the things you can: Emotion regulation is more beneficial for people from lower than from higher socioeconomic status. Emotion, 17(1), 141–154.
57.
TroyA. S.SaquibS.ThalJ.CiukD. J. (2019). The regulation of negative and positive affect in response to daily stressors. Emotion, 19(5), 751–763.
58.
TroyA. S.ShallcrossA. J.MaussI. B. (2013). A person-by-situation approach to emotion regulation: Cognitive reappraisal can either help or hurt, depending on the context. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2505–2514.
59.
WebbT. L.MilesE.SheeranP. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 775–808.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
