Research suggests that people sometimes perceive a relationship between stimuli when no such relationship exists (i.e., illusory correlation). Illusory-correlation effects are thought to play a central role in the formation of stereotypes and evaluations of minority versus majority groups, often leading to less favorable impressions of minorities. Extant theories differ in terms of whether they attribute illusory-correlation effects to processes operating during learning (belief formation) or measurement (belief expression), and whether different evaluation measures should be differentially sensitive to illusory-correlation effects. Past research found mixed evidence for dissociative effects of illusory-correlation manipulations on measures of implicit (i.e., automatic) and explicit (i.e., controlled) evaluation. Four high-powered studies obtained illusory-correlation effects on explicit evaluations, but not implicit evaluations probed with an Implicit Association Test, Evaluative Priming Task, and Affect Misattribution Procedure. The results are consistent with theories that attribute illusory-correlation effects to processes during belief expression.
BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Random House.
2.
BerghR.AkramiN. (2017). Generalized prejudice: Old wisdom and new perspectives. In SibleyC. G.BarlowF. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 438–460). Cambridge University Press.
3.
BerndsenM.SpearsR. (1997). From biased covariation to meaningful diåerentiation. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 56, 127–138.
4.
BlantonH.JaccardJ. (2015). Not so fast: Ten challenges to importing implicit attitude measures to media psychology. Media Psychology, 18, 338–369.
5.
BulliF.PrimiC. (2006). Illusory correlation and cognitive processes: A multinomial model of source-monitoring. Review of Psychology, 13, 95–102.
6.
CarraroL.NegriP.CastelliL.PastoreM. (2014). Implicit and explicit illusory correlation as a function of political ideology. PLOS ONE, 9(5), Article e96312.
7.
ConeJ.FergusonM. J. (2015). He Did what? The role of diagnosticity in revising implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 37–57.
8.
CorneilleO.MertensG. (in press). Behavioral and physiological evidence challenges the automatic acquisition of evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science.
9.
De HouwerJ. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342–353.
10.
De HouwerJ.GawronskiB.Barnes-HolmesD. (2013). A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research. European Review of Social Psychology, 24(1), 252–287.
11.
De HouwerJ.Teige-MocigembaS.SpruytA.MoorsA. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.
12.
De SchryverM.HughesS.RosseelY.De HouwerJ. (2015). Unreliable yet still replicable: A comment on LeBel and Paunonen (2011). Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 2039.
13.
EderA. B.FiedlerK.Hamm-EderS. (2011). Illusory correlations revisited: The role of pseudo-contingencies and working-memory capacity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 517–532.
14.
FazioR. H.SanbonmatsuD. M.PowellM. C.KardesF. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238.
15.
FiedlerK. (1991). The tricky nature of skewed frequency tables: An information loss account of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 24–36.
16.
FiedlerK.WaltherE. (2004). Stereotyping as inductive hypothesis testing. Psychology Press.
17.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
18.
GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2014). Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 283–310). Cambridge University Press.
19.
GawronskiB.De HouwerJ.ShermanJ. W. (in press). Twenty-five years of research using implicit measures. Social Cognition.
20.
GawronskiB.SritharanR. (2010). Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: Determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 216–240). Guilford Press.
21.
GeraertsE.BernsteinD. M.MerckelbachH.LindersC.RaymaekersL.LoftusE. F. (2008). Lasting false beliefs and their behavioral consequences. Psychological Science, 19, 749–753.
22.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
23.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
24.
HamiltonD. L.GiffordR. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392–407.
25.
HuX.GawronskiB.BalasR. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The Effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 17–32.
26.
JohnsonC.MullenB. (1994). Evidence for the accessibility of paired distinctiveness in distinctiveness-based illusory correlation in stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 65–70.
27.
KlauerK. C.MeiserT. (2000). A source-monitoring analysis of illusory correlations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1074–1093.
28.
Koppehele-GosselJ.HoffmannL.BanseR.GawronskiB. (2020). Evaluative priming as an implicit measure of evaluation: An examination of outlier-treatments for evaluative priming scores. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, Article 103905.
29.
KurdiB.DunhamY. (in press). Propositional accounts of implicit evaluation: Taking stock and looking ahead. Social Cognition.
30.
MullenB.JohnsonC. (1990). Distinctiveness based illusory correlations and stereotyping: A meta-analytic integration. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 11–28.
31.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extra-personal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653–667.
32.
PayneB. K.BurkleyM. A.StokesM. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 16–31.
33.
PayneB. K.ChengC. M.GovorunO.StewartB. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293.
34.
RatliffK. A.NosekB. A. (2010). Creating distinct implicit and explicit attitudes with an illusory correlation paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 721–728.
35.
RothermundK.WenturaD. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165.
36.
RudmanL. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79–82.
37.
RydellR. J.GawronskiB. (2009). I like you, I like you not: Understanding the formation of context-dependent automatic attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1118–1152.
38.
SearsD. O.HenryP. J. (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 259–275.
39.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.
40.
TverskyK.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
41.
Van DesselP.ConeJ.GastA.De HouwerJ. (2020). The impact of valenced verbal information on implicit and explicit evaluation: The role of information diagnosticity, primacy, and memory cueing. Cognition and Emotion, 34, 74–85.
42.
Van DesselP.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2015). Instruction-based approach–avoidance Effects: Changing stimulus evaluation via the mere instruction to approach or avoid stimuli. Experimental Psychology, 62, 161–169.
43.
Van DesselP.GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2019). Does explaining social behavior require multiple memory systems?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 368–369.
44.
Van DesselP.MertensG.SmithC. T.De HouwerJ. (2017). The mere exposure instruction effect: Mere exposure instructions influence liking. Experimental Psychology, 64, 299–314.
45.
WellsC.ReedyJ.GastilJ.LeeC. (2009). Information distortion and voting choices: The origins and effects of factual beliefs in initiative elections. Political Psychology, 30, 953–969.
46.
WheelerS. C.PettyR. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826.
47.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 9, 1–27.
48.
ZhouH.FishbachA. (2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 493–504.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
