Considerable research has focused on how people derive information about others’ social category memberships from their faces. Theoretical models posit that early extraction of task-relevant information from a face should determine the efficiency with which that face is categorized, but evidence supporting this idea has been elusive. Here, we used a novel trial-level data analytic approach to examine the relationship between two event-related potential components—the P2, indexing early attention to category-relevant information, and the P3, indexing stimulus evaluation—and the speed of overt categorization judgments. As predicted, a larger face-elicited P2 on a particular trial was associated with faster overt race or gender categorization of that face. Moreover, this association was mediated by P3 latency, indicating that extraction of more category-relevant information early in processing facilitated stimulus evaluation. These findings support continuous flow models of information processing and the long-theorized functional significance of face-elicited neurophysiological responses for social categorization.
AmodioD. M. (2009). Coordinated roles of motivation and perception in the regulation of intergroup responses: Frontal cortical asymmetry effects on the P2 event-related potential and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2609–2617. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21395
3.
AmodioD. M.BartholowB. D.ItoT. A. (2014). Tracking the dynamics of the social brain: ERP approaches for social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(3), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst177
4.
BarghJ. A. (2014). The historical origins of priming as the preparation of behavioral responses: Unconscious carryover and contextual influences of real-world importance. Social Cognition, 32(Supplement), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.209
5.
BartholowB. D.RiordanM. A.SaultsJ. S.LustS. A. (2009). Psychophysiological evidence of response conflict and strategic control of responses in affective priming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.015
6.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
7.
BerryM. P.TanovicE.JoormannJ.SanislowC. A. (2019). Relation of depression symptoms to sustained reward and loss sensitivity. Psychophysiology, 56(7), Article e13364. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13364
8.
BodenhausenG. V.KangS. K.PeeryD. (2012). Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In FiskeS. T.MacraeC. N. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social cognition (pp. 318–336). SAGE.
9.
BrebnerJ. L.KrigolsonO.HandyT. C.QuadfliegS.TurkD. J. (2011). The importance of skin color and facial structure in perceiving and remembering others: An electrophysiological study. Brain Research, 1388, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.090
BrushC. J.EhmannP. J.HajcakG.SelbyE. A.AldermanB. L. (2018). Using multilevel modeling to examine blunted neural responses to reward in major depression. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(12), 1032–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.04.003
12.
CaharelS.MontalanB.FromagerE.BernardC.LalondeR.MohamedR. (2011). Other-race and inversion effects during the structural encoding stage of face processing in a race categorization task: An event-related brain potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 79(2), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.018
13.
CaldaraR.RossionB.BovetP.HauertC. A. (2004). Event-related potentials and time course of the “other-race” face classification advantage. NeuroReport, 15(5), 905–910.
14.
CaldaraR.ThutG.ServoirP.MichelC. M.BovetP.RenaultB. (2003). Face versus non-face object perception and the “other-race” effect: A spatio-temporal event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00407-8
15.
ChauveauN.FranceriesX.DoyonB.RigaudB.MorucciJ. P.CelsisP. (2004). Effects of skull thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity on forward EEG/ERP computations using a spherical three-dimensional resistor mesh model. Human Brain Mapping, 21(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10152
16.
ChenY.PanF.WangH.XiaoS.ZhaoL. (2013). Electrophysiological correlates of processing own- and other-race faces. Brain Topography, 26(4), 606–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0286-x
17.
CloutierJ.MasonM. F.MacraeC. N. (2005). The perceptual determinants of person construal: Reopening the social-cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 885–894. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.885
18.
ColesM. G. H.GrattonG.BashoreT. R.EriksenC. W.DonchinE. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 529–553. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.11.5.529
19.
ColesM. G. H.GrattonG.FabianiM. (1990). Event-related brain potentials. In CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G. (Eds.), Principles of psychophysiology: Physical, social, and inferential elements (pp. 413–455). Cambridge University Press.
20.
ColesM. G. H.RuggM. D. (1995). Event-related potentials: An introduction. In RuggM. D.ColesM. G. H. (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
21.
ColesM. G. H.SmidH. G. O. M.ScheffersM. K.OttenL. J. (1995). Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In RuggM. D.ColesM. G. H. (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 86–131). Oxford University Press.
22.
CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1314–1329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1314
23.
CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB.SadlerM. S.KeeseeT. (2007). Across the thin blue line: Police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1006–1023. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1006
24.
CorrellJ.UrlandG. R.ItoT. A. (2006). Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.02.006
25.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 583–619. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
26.
DawsonG. D. (1954). A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 6, 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(54)90007-3
27.
DebenerS.UllspergerM.SiegelM.FiehlerK.von CramonD. Y.EngelA. K. (2005). Trial-by-trial coupling of concurrent electroencephalogram and functional magnetic resonance imaging identifies the dynamics of performance monitoring. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(50), 11730–11737. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3286-05.2005
28.
DeffkeI.SanderT.HeidenreichJ.SommerW.CurioG.TrahmsL.LueschowA. (2007). MEG/EEG sources of the 170-ms response to faces are co-localized in the fusiform gyrus. NeuroImage, 35(4), 1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.034
29.
DickterC. L.BartholowB. D. (2007). Racial ingroup and outgroup attention biases revealed by event-related brain potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm012
30.
DickterC. L.KittelJ. A. (2012). The effect of stereotypical primes on the neural processing of racially ambiguous faces. Social Neuroscience, 7(6), 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.690345
31.
DonchinE. (1979). Event-related brain potentials: A tool in the study of human information processing. In BegleiterH. (Ed.), Evoked potentials and behavior (pp. 13–75). Plenum Press.
32.
DonchinE.ColesM. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00058027
33.
Duncan-JohnsonC. C.DonchinE. (1982). The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biological Psychology, 14(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(82)90016-3
34.
EberhardtJ. L.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17(5), 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01716.x
35.
EimerM. (2000). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. NeuroReport, 11(10), 2319–2324.
36.
EriksenC. W.SchultzD. W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception & Psychophysics, 25(4), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198804
37.
FengL.LiuJ.WangZ.LiJ.LiL.GeL.TianJ.LeeK. (2011). The other face of the other-race effect: An fMRI investigation of the other-race face categorization advantage. Neuropsychologia, 49(13), 3739–3749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.031
38.
FlehmigH. C.SteinbornM.LangnerR.ScholzA.WesthoffK. (2007). Assessing intraindividual variability in sustained attention: Reliability, relation to speed and accuracy, and practice effects. Psychology Science, 49(2), 132–149.
39.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247–279.
40.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2014). The dynamic interactive model of person construal: Coordinating sensory and social processes. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 235–248). The Guilford Press.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN.MidgleyK. J.HolcombP. J. (2011). The real-time link between person perception and action: Brain potential evidence for dynamic continuity. Social Neuroscience, 6(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.490674
43.
FreemanJ. B.JohnsonK. L. (2016). More than meets the eye: Split-second social perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(5), 362–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.003
44.
FreemanJ. B.PaukerK.SanchezD. T. (2016). A perceptual pathway to bias: Interracial exposure reduces abrupt shifts in real-time race perception that predict mixed-race bias. Psychological Science, 27(4), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615627418
45.
FreemanJ. B.PennerA. M.SapersteinA.ScheutzM.AmbadyN. (2011). Looking the part: Social status cues shape racial perception. PLOS ONE, 6(9), Article e25107.
46.
GeL.ZhangH.WangZ.QuinnP. C.PascalisO.KellyD.SlaterA.TianJ.LeeK. (2009). Two faces of the other-race effect: Recognition and categorisation of Caucasian and Chinese faces. Perception, 38(8), 1199–1210. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6136
47.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
48.
GrattonG.BoscoC. M.KramerA. F.ColesM. G. H.WickensC. D.DonchinE. (1990). Event-related brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 75(5), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(90)90087-Z
49.
GrattonG.ColesM. G. H.SirevaagE. J.EriksenC. W.DonchinE. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.331
HagemannD.HewigJ.WalterC.NaumannE. (2008). Skull thickness and magnitude of EEG alpha activity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119(6), 1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.02.010
52.
HeY.JohnsonM. K.DovidioJ. F.McCarthyG. (2009). The relation between race-related implicit associations and scalp-recorded neural activity evoked by faces from different races. Social Neuroscience, 4(5), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910902949184
53.
HehmanE.CarpinellaC. M.JohnsonK. L.LeitnerJ. B.FreemanJ. B. (2014). Early processing of gendered facial cues predicts the electoral success of female politicians. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614534701
54.
HerrmannM. J.SchreppelT.JägerD.KoehlerS.EhlisA.-C.FallgatterA. J. (2007). The other-race effect for face perception: An event-related potential study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 114(7), 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-007-0624-9
55.
HillsP. J.LewisM. B. (2006). Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by shifting attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600654750
56.
HillsP. J.LewisM. B. (2011). Reducing the own-race bias in face recognition by attentional shift using fixation crosses preceding the lower half of a face. Visual Cognition, 19(3), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2010.528250
57.
HillyardS. A.MünteT. F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials. Perception and Pscyhophysics, 36, 185–198.
58.
HugenbergK.YoungS. G.BernsteinM. J.SaccoD. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1168–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020463
ItoT. A.ThompsonE.CacioppoJ. T. (2004). Tracking the timecourse of social perception: The effects of racial cues on event-related brain potentials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264335
61.
ItoT. A.TomelleriS. (2017). Seeing is not stereotyping: The functional independence of categorization and stereotype activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(5), 758–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx009
62.
ItoT. A.UrlandG. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616
63.
ItoT. A.UrlandG. R. (2005). The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: An ERP study of race and gender perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.1.21
64.
JensenA. R. (1992). The importance of intraindividual variation in reaction time. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(8), 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90004-9
65.
JoyceC.RossionB. (2005). The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(11), 2613–2631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.005
66.
KawakamiK.AmodioD. M.HugenbergK. (2017). Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 1–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.001
67.
KramerR. S. S.YoungA. W.DayM. G.BurtonA. M. (2017). Robust social categorization emerges from learning the identities of very few faces. Psychological Review, 124(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000048
68.
KubotaJ. T.ItoT. A. (2007). Multiple cues in social perception: The time course of processing race and facial expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 738–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.023
KutasM.McCarthyG.DonchinE. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197(4305), 792–795. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.887923
71.
LevinD. T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1364–1382. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1364
72.
LevsenM. P.Volpert-EsmondH. I.BartholowB. D. (2018). It’s about time: Event-related potentials and the temporal parameters of mental events. In BlantonH.LaCroixJ. M.WebsterG. D. (Eds.), Measurement in social psychology (pp. 102–126). Taylor & Francis.
LuckS. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
75.
LuckS. J.HillyardS. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 1000–1014. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.20.5.1000
76.
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
77.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
78.
MacraeC. N.BodenhausenG. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93
79.
MacraeC. N.QuinnK. A.MasonM. F.QuadfliegS. (2005). Understanding others: The face and person construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 686–695. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.686
MasonM. F.MacraeC. N. (2004). Categorizing and individuating others: The neural substrates of person perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(10), 1785–1795. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929042947801
82.
McCarthyG.DonchinE. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 211(4477), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7444452
83.
McClellandJ. L. (1991). Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90002-6
84.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
85.
MeissnerC. A.BrighamJ. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
86.
NieuwenhuisS.Aston-JonesG.CohenJ. D. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus—Norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
87.
OfanR. H.RubinN.AmodioD. M. (2011). Seeing race: N170 responses to race and their relation to automatic racial attitudes and controlled processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3153–3161. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00014
PhiliastidesM. G.RatcliffR.SajdaP. (2006). Neural representation of task difficulty and decision making during perceptual categorization: A timing diagram. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(35), 8965–8975. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1655-06.2006
90.
PituchK. A.StapletonL. M. (2008). The performance of methods to test upper-level mediation in the presence of nonnormal data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 43(2), 237–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170802034844
91.
PituchK. A.WhittakerT. A.StapletonL. M. (2005). A comparison of methods to test for mediation in multisite experiments. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4001_1
92.
PolichJ. (2012). Neuropsychology of P300. In KappenmanE. S.LuckS. J. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 159–188). Oxford University Press.
93.
PolichJ.EllersonP. C.CohenJ. (1996). P300, stimulus intensity, modality, and probability. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(96)00028-1
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
96.
QuinnK. A.RosenthalH. E. S. (2012). Categorizing others and the self: How social memory structures guide social perception and behavior. Learning and Motivation, 43(4), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2012.05.008
97.
RatcliffR.PhiliastidesM. G.SajdaP. (2009). Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6539–6544. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812589106
98.
RegtvoortA. G. F. M.van LeeuwenT. H.StoelR. D.van der LeijA. (2006). Efficiency of visual information processing in children at-risk for dyslexia: Habituation of single-trial ERPs. Brain and Language, 98(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.006
99.
RequinJ.RiehleA.SealJ. (1988). Neuronal activity and information processing in motor control: From stages to continuous flow. Biological Psychology, 26(1), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(88)90019-1
100.
RossionB.JoyceC. A.CottrellG. W.TarrM. J. (2003). Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. NeuroImage, 20(3), 1609–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.010
SandersA. F. (1998). Elements of human performance. Lawrence Erlbaum.
103.
SassenhagenJ.SchlesewskyM.Bornkessel-SchlesewskyI. (2014). The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned. Brain and Language, 137, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.010
104.
SemlitschH. V.AndererP.SchusterP.PresslichO. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23(6), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
105.
SenholziK. B.ItoT. A. (2013). Structural face encoding: How task affects the N170’s sensitivity to race. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(8), 937–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss091
106.
SimonJ. C.GutsellJ. N. (2019). Effects of minimal grouping on implicit prejudice, infrahumanization, and neural processing despite orthogonal social categorizations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23, 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219837348
107.
SimpsonE. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x
108.
StahlJ.WieseH.SchweinbergerS. R. (2008). Expertise and own-race bias in face processing: An event-related potential study. NeuroReport, 19(5), 583–587. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f97b4d
109.
StahlJ.WieseH.SchweinbergerS. R. (2010). Learning task affects ERP-correlates of the own-race bias, but not recognition memory performance. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 2027–2040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.024
TibonR.LevyD. A. (2015). Striking a balance: Analyzing unbalanced event-related potential data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 555 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00555
112.
TofighiD.MacKinnonD. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x
113.
ValentineT.EndoM. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 44(4), 671–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401305
114.
Volpert-EsmondH. I.BartholowB. D. (2019). Explicit categorization goals affect attention-related processing of race and gender during person construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, Article 103839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103839
115.
Volpert-EsmondH. I.MerkleE. C.BartholowB. D. (2017). The iterative nature of person construal: Evidence from event-related potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(7), 1097–1107. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx048
116.
Volpert-EsmondH. I.MerkleE. C.LevsenM. P.ItoT. A.BartholowB. D. (2018). Using trial-level data and multilevel modeling to investigate within-task change in event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 55(5), Article e13044. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13044
117.
Von GuntenC. D.Volpert-EsmondH. I.BartholowB. D. (2018). Temporal dynamics of reactive cognitive control as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 55, Article e13007. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13007
118.
VossenH.Van BreukelenG.HermensH.Van OsJ.LousbergR. (2011). More potential in statistical analyses of event-related potentials: A mixed regression approach. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(3), e56–e68. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.348
WalkerP. M.SilvertL.HewstoneM.NobreA. C. (2008). Social contact and other-race face processing in the human brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm035
121.
WeissmanD. H.RobertsK. C.VisscherK. M.WoldorffM. G. (2006). The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9(7), 971–978. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1727
122.
WieseH.KaufmannJ. M.SchweinbergerS. R. (2014). The neural signature of the own-race bias: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 24(3), 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs369
123.
WijersA. A.MulderG.OkitaT.MulderL. J. M.ScheffersM. K. (1989). Attention to color: An analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 26(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb03137.x
Willadsen-JensenE. C.ItoT. A. (2008). A foot in both worlds: Asian Americans’ perceptions of Asian, White, and racially ambiguous faces. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207088037
126.
Willadsen-JensenE. C.ItoT. A. (2015). The effect of context on responses to racially ambiguous faces: Changes in perception and evaluation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(7), 885–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu134
127.
WillenbockelV.SadrJ.FisetD.HorneG. O.GosselinF.TanakaJ. W. (2010). Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.671
128.
WoodmanG. F. (2010). A brief introduction to the use of event-related potentials in studies of perception and attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(8), 2031–2046. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196680
129.
WoodworthR. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. Holt.
ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J.PreacherK. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450
132.
ZhaoL.BentinS. (2008). Own- and other-race categorization of faces by race, gender, and age. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(6), 1093–1099. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.6.1093
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
