Religious Identity and Morality: Evidence for Religious Residue and Decay in Moral Foundations

Abstract

Religion provides a powerful social identity. Building on previous work demonstrating that formerly religious individuals (i.e., religious dones) more closely resemble currently religious individuals than do never religious individuals (i.e., religious nones), we report three studies examining a potential religious residue effect for the endorsement of moral foundations. In Study 1 (N = 312), we found evidence of a stairstep pattern of endorsement of the five moral foundations, descending from currently religious to formerly religious to never religious individuals. Study 2 (N = 957) replicated these findings with a larger sample. In Study 3 (N = 2,071), we found evidence for the religious residue effect in a 4-wave longitudinal study of adolescents and young adults and suggest that the residual effects of religion on endorsement of moral foundations may erode over time. These studies add to a recently burgeoning line of work on the nature and consequences of religious deidentification.

Keywords

religious residue religion morality moral foundations formerly religious nonreligious

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

Hunsberger

(1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133.

Aquino

Reed

I. I.

(2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, Article 1423.

Baker

J. O.

Smith

B. G.

(2015). American secularism: Cultural contours of nonreligious belief systems. New York University Press.

Bassett

Van Tongeren

D. R.

Green

J. D.

Sonntag

M. E.

Kilpatrick

(2015). The interactive effects of mortality salience and political orientation on moral judgments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 306–323.

Bulbulia

Osborne

Sibley

C. G.

(2013). Moral foundations predict religious orientations in New Zealand. PLOS ONE, 8, Article e80224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080224

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Davis

D. E.

Dooley

M. T.

Hook

J. N.

Choe

McElroy

S. E.

(2017). The purity/sanctity subscale of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire does not work similarly for religious versus non-religious individuals. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9, Article 124.

DeWall

C. N.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

(2020). No longer religious, but still spending money religiously: Religious rituals and community influence consumer behavior among religious dones. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Erikson

E. H.

(1993). Childhood and society. W.W. Norton & Company.

10.

Exline

J. J.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

Bradley

D. F.

Wilt

J. A.

Stauner

Pargament

K. I.

DeWall

C. N.

(2020). Pulling away from religion: Religious/spiritual struggles and religious disengagement among college students. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000375.

11.

Fisher

A. R.

(2017). A review and conceptual model of the research on doubt, disaffiliation, and related religious changes. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(4), 358–367.

12.

Galen

L. W.

(2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028251

13.

Gantman

Van Bavel

(2016). Behavior is multiply determined, and perception has multiple components: The case of moral perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, Article e242.

14.

Gervais

W. M.

Shariff

A. F.

Norenzayan

(2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206.

15.

Gooren

(2011). Deconversion: Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States: A review essay. Pastoral Psychology, 60, 609–617.

16.

Graham

Haidt

(2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150.

17.

Graham

Haidt

Koleva

Motyl

Iyer

Wojcik

Ditto

P. H.

(2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.

18.

Graham

Haidt

Nosek

B. A.

(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.

19.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

Iyer

Koleva

Ditto

P. H.

(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

20.

Haidt

Kesebir

(2010). Morality. In Fiske

S. T.

Gilbert

D. T.

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 797–832). John Wiley.

21.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based analysis. Guilford Press.

22.

Jacobs

(1987). Deconversion from religious movements: An analysis of charismatic bonding and spiritual commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 294–308.

23.

Kosmin

B. A.

Keysar

(Eds.). (2007). Secularism & secularity: Contemporary international perspectives. ISSSC.

24.

LeDrew

(2013). Discovering atheism: Heterogeneity in trajectories to atheist identity and activism. Sociology of Religion, 74, 431–453.

25.

Lim

MacGregor

C. A.

Putnam

R. D.

(2010). Secular and liminal: Discovering heterogeneity among religious nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49, 596–618.

26.

McIntosh

D. N.

(1995). Religion-as-schema, with implications for the relation between religion and coping. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 5, 1–16.

27.

McKay

Whitehouse

(2015). Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 447–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038455

28.

McLaughlin

A. T.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

Teahan

Davis

D. E.

Rice

K. G.

DeWall

C. N.

(2020). Who are the religious “dones?” A cross-cultural latent profile analysis of formerly religious individuals. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000376.

29.

Newton

McIntosh

D. N.

(2013). Unique contributions of religion to meaning. In Hicks

J. A.

Routledge

(Eds.), The experience of meaning in life: Classical perspectives, emerging themes, and controversies (pp. 257–269). Springer.

30.

Norenzayan

Gervais

W. M.

(2013). The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 20–25.

31.

Paloutzian

R. F.

Murken

Streib

Robler-Namini

(2013). Conversion, deconversion, and spiritual transformation. In Paloutzian

R. F.

Park

C. L.

(Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 399–421). Guilford Press.

32.

Pew. (2019). In U.S., decline of Christianity continues at rapid pace. https://www.pewforum.org/2019/10/17/in-u-s-decline-of-christianity-continues-at-rapid-pace/

33.

Pew-Templeton. (2015). Global religious futures project. http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/

34.

Preston

J. L.

Ritter

R. S.

(2012). Cleanliness and godliness: Mutual association between two kinds of personal purity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1365–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.015

35.

Preston

J. L.

Ritter

R. S.

(2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499937

36.

Rabelo

A. L. A.

Pilati

(2019). Are religious and nonreligious people different in terms of moral judgment and empathy? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000277.

37.

Rutland

Killen

Abrams

(2010). A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 279–291.

38.

Saroglou

(2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The Big Four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1320–1340.

39.

Schein

Gray

(2015). The unifying moral dyad: Liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1147–1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215591501

40.

Schwadel

(2020). The politics of religious nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 59, 180–189.

41.

Shariff

A. F.

Willard

A. K.

Andersen

Norenzayan

(2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 27–48.

42.

Smith

Lundquist Denton

(2008). Methodological design and procedures for the National Study of Youth and Religion (NSYR): Longitudinal telephone survey (Waves 1, 2, & 3). Retrieved February 3, 2016, from http://youthandreligion.nd.edu/assets/102496/master_just_methods_11_12_2008.pdf

43.

Suh

Russell

(2015). Non-affiliation, non-denominationalism, religious switching, and denominational switching: Longitudinal analysis of the effects on religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 57, 25–41.

44.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

Davis

D. E.

Hook

J. N.

Rowatt

Worthington

E. L.

Jr. (2018). Religious differences in reporting and expressing humility. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10, 174–184.

45.

Van Tongeren

D. R.

DeWall

C. N.

Chen

Sibley

C. G.

Bulbulia

. (2020). Religious residue: Cross-cultural evidence that religious psychology and behavior persist following deidentification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000288.

46.

Ward

S. J.

King

L. A.

(2019). Moral stereotypes, moral self-image, and religiosity. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000263.

47.

Ysseldyk

Matheson

Anisman

(2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 60–71.

48.

Zuckerman

Galen

L. W.

Pasquale

F. L.

(2016). The nonreligious: Understanding secular people and societies. Oxford University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.70 MB