In a world where they are inundated with potential temptations, how are successful dieters able to resist the urge to give in to unhealthy foods? Four studies suggest distance is one tool that may enable people to forego temptation. People with strong goals to eat healthy preferred to be farther away from unhealthy foods (Study 1a), which was associated with feeling less tempted by and less likely to give in to them (Study 1b). In addition, successful self-regulators with goals to restrict unhealthy eating perceptually represented the distance to unhealthy foods as greater than the distance to healthy foods (Study 2). Moreover, in a week-long food diary study, distancing from temptations helped people make healthier food choices (Study 3). The studies suggest that successful self-regulators’ motivations to avoid unhealthy foods are reflected in the way they structure and perceive the world. Distancing may allow people space to make healthier choices.
AinslieG. (1992). Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlterA.BalcetisE. (2011). Fondness makes the distance grow shorter: Desired locations seem closer because they are more vivid. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 16–21.
3.
BalcetisE. (2016). Approach and avoidance as organizing structures for motivated distance perception. Emotion Review, 8(2), 115–128.
4.
BalcetisE.ColeS.BisiA. (2015). Near and nothing to it: Perceived proximity improves exercise by increasing feasibility. Motivation Science, 1, 203–218.
5.
BalcetisE.DunningD. (2010). Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147–152.
6.
BoekaertsM.ZeidnerM.PintrichP. R. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. Elsevier.
7.
ColeS.BalcetisE. (2013). Sources of resources: Bioenergetic and psychoenergetic resources influence distance perception. Social Cognition, 31, 711–722.
8.
ColeS.BalcetisE.DunningD. (2013). Affective signals of threat produce perceived proximity. Psychological Science, 24, 34–40.
9.
ColeS.RiccioM.BalcetisE. (2014). Focused and fired up: Narrowed attention produces perceived proximity and increases goal-relevant action. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 815–822.
10.
de RidderD. T.de WitJ. B. (2006). Self-regulation in health behavior: Concepts, theories, and central issues. In de RidderD.T.de WitJ.B. (Eds.), Self-regulation in health behavior (pp. 1–23). John Wiley & Sons.
11.
DominickJ. K.ColeS. (2020). Goals as identities: Boosting perceptions of healthy-eater identity for easier goal pursuit. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 410–426.
12.
DuckworthA. L.GendlerT. S.GrossJ. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55.
13.
FarleyT. A.RiceJ.BodorJ. N.CohenD. A.BluthenthalR. N.RoseD. (2009). Measuring the food environment: Shelf space of fruits, vegetables, and snack foods in stores. Journal of Urban Health, 86, 672–682.
14.
FishbachA.ConverseB. A. (2010). Walking the line between goals and temptations: Asymmetric effects of counteractive control. In HassinR. R.OchsnerK.TropeY. (Eds.), Self control in society, mind, and brain (pp. 389–407). Oxford University Press.
15.
FishbachA.FriedmanR. S.KruglanskiA. W. (2003). Leading us not unto temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296–309.
16.
FishbachA.ShahJ. Y. (2006). Self control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 820–832.
17.
FishbachA.ShenL. (2014). The explicit and implicit ways of overcoming temptation. In ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual process theories of the social mind (pp. 454–467). Guilford Press.
18.
FishbachA.ZhangY.TropeY. (2010). Counteractive evaluation: Asymmetric shifts in the implicit value of conflicting motivations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 29–38.
19.
FujitaK. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than just the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352–366.
20.
FujitaK.CarnevaleJ. J. (2012). Transcending temptation through abstraction: The role of construal level in self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 248–252.
21.
FujitaK.HanH. A. (2009). Moving beyond deliberative control of impulses: The effect of construal levels on evaluative associations in self-control conflicts. Psychological Science, 20, 799–804.
22.
HassinR.OchsnerK.TropeY. (Eds.). (2010). Self control in society, mind, and brain. Oxford University Press.
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. The Guilford Press.
24.
HaynesA.KempsE.MoffittR.MohrP. (2015). Reduce temptation or resist it? Experienced temptation mediates the relationship between implicit evaluations of unhealthy snack foods and subsequent intake. Psychology & Health, 30, 534–550.
25.
HofmannW.BaumeisterR. F.FörsterG.VohsK. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335.
26.
KoberH.KrossE. F.MischelW.HartC. L.OchsnerK. N. (2010). Regulation of craving by cognitive strategies in cigarette smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 106, 52–55.
27.
KrossE.AydukO.MischelW. (2005). When asking “why” does not hurt: Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16, 709–715.
28.
LoewensteinG. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292.
29.
LoyL. S.WieberF.GollwitzerP. M.OettingenG. (2016). Supporting sustainable food consumption: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) aligns intentions and behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 607.
30.
MagenE.GrossJ. J. (2010). Getting our act together: Toward a general model of self-control. In HassinR.OchsnerK.TropeY. (Eds.), Self control in society, mind, and brain (pp. 335–353). Oxford University Press.
31.
MaglioS. J.TropeY.LibermanN. (2013). Distance from a distance: Psychological distance reduces sensitivity to any further psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 644–657.
32.
MetcalfeJ.MischelW. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3–19.
33.
MeuleA.PapiesE. K.KüblerA. (2012). Differentiating between successful and unsuccessful dieters: Validity and reliability of the Perceived Self-Regulatory Success in Dieting Scale. Appetite, 58, 822–826.
34.
MillerR. S. (2008). Attending to temptation: The operation (and perils) of attention to alternatives in close relationships. In ForgasJ. P.FitnessJ. (Eds.), Social relationships: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 321–337). Psychology Press.
35.
MilyavskayaM.InzlichtM.HopeN.KoestnerR. (2015). Saying “no” to temptation: Want-to motivation improves self-regulation by reducing temptation rather than by increasing self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, Article 677.
36.
MischelW. (1974). Processes in delay of gratification. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 249–292). Academic Press.
37.
MischelW.BakerN. (1975). Cognitive transformations of reward objects through instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 254–261.
38.
MischelW.EbbesenE. B.ZeissA.R. (1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 204–218.
39.
MooreB.MischelW.ZeissA. (1976). Comparative effects of the reward stimulus and its cognitive representation in voluntary delay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, Article 419.
40.
MoskowitzG. B.GollwitzerP. M.WaselW.SchaalB. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167–184.
41.
PapiesE.StroebeW.AartsH. (2007). Pleasure in the mind: Restrained eating and spontaneous hedonic thoughts about food. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 810–817.
42.
PatrickV. M.HagtvedtH. (2012). “I don’t” versus “I can’t”: When empowered refusal motivates goal-directed behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 371–381.
43.
PattersonC. J.MischelW. (1976). Effects of temptation-inhibiting and task-facilitating plans on self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 209–217.
ProffittD. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110–122.
46.
SchnallS.ZadraJ. R.ProffittD. R. (2010). Direct evidence for the economy of action: Glucose and the perception of geographical slant. Perception, 39, 464–482.
47.
ScholerA. A.MieleD. B.MurayamaK.FujitaK. (2018). New directions in self-regulation: The role of metamotivational beliefs. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 437–442.
48.
SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.). (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge.
49.
ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428.
50.
SiegelE.WalkerP.StefanucciJ. (2009). So close and yet so far away: An effect of disgust on distance perception and graspability. Journal of Vision, 9(8), Article 1096.
51.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
52.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2013, January17–19). Life after p-hacking [Conference session]. Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology. New Orleans, LA, United States. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2205186
53.
StadlerG.OettingenG.GollwitzerP. M. (2010). Intervention effects of information and self-regulation on eating fruits and vegetables over two years. Health Psychology, 29, 274–283.
54.
SticeE.CooperJ. A.SchoellerD. A.TappeK.LoweM. R. (2007). Are Dietary Restraint Scales valid measures of moderate- to long-term dietary restriction? Objective biological and behavioral data suggest not. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.449
55.
StunkardA. J.MessickS. (1985). The Three Factor Eating Questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition, and hunger. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 29, 71–83.
56.
TropeY.FishbachA. (2000). Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 493–506.
57.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.
58.
Valdés-ConroyB.RománF. J.HinojosaJ. A.ShorkeyS. P. (2012). So far so good: Emotion in the peripersonal/extrapersonal space. PLOS ONE, 7(11), Article e49162.
59.
van KoningsbruggenG. M.StroebeW.AartsH. (2011). Through the eyes of dieters: Biased size perception of food following tempting food primes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 293–299.
60.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. Guilford Publications.
61.
VohsK. D.HeathertonT. F. (2000). Self-regulatory failure: A resource-depletion approach. Psychological Science, 11, 249–254.
62.
WansinkB.PainterJ. E.LeeY. K. (2006). The office candy dish: Proximity’s influence on estimated and actual consumption. International Journal of Obesity, 30, 871–875.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
