Most psychological research has investigated victims’ forgiveness and offenders’ self-forgiveness separately, ignoring interactive and dynamic processes between them. We suggest that both parties are interdependent in their attempts to revalidate the values violated by the wrongdoing. In the present study, both partners of close relationships dyads (including 164 complete couples) were surveyed over three time-points following the report of a wrongdoing by one of the partners. Latent growth modeling showed that victims’ forgiveness was associated with growth in their perception of a value consensus with the offender. Victims’ value consensus perception was associated with growth in offenders’ perception of value consensus and engagement in genuine self-forgiveness (working through). However, directly, forgiveness was associated with decline in offenders’ genuine self-forgiveness, while offenders’ self-punitiveness was associated with decline in victims’ forgiveness. The findings highlight the regulatory function of victim forgiveness and the pivotal role of restoring value consensus in interactive moral repair.
BaumeisterR. F.ExlineJ. J.SommerK. L. (1998). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In Worthington, Jr.E. L. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness (pp. 79–104). Templeton Press.
2.
BollenK. A.CurranP. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation approach. Wiley.
3.
CarpenterT. P.CarlisleR. D.TsangJ.-A. (2014). Tipping the scales: Conciliatory behavior and the morality of self-forgiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 389–401.
4.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619.
5.
CurranP. J.HowardA.BainterS.LaneS.McGinleyJ. (2014). The separation of between-person and within-person components of individual change over time: A latent curve model with structured residuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 879–894.
6.
CurranP. J.ObeidatK.LosardoD. (2010). Twelve frequently asked questions about growth curve modeling. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 121–136.
7.
DavisD. E.HoM. Y.GriffinB. J.BellC.HookJ. N.Van TongerenD. R.WestbrookC. J. (2015). Forgiving the self and physical and mental health correlates: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 329–335.
8.
De Vel-PalumboM.WenzelM.WoodyattL. (2019). Self-punishment promotes reconciliation with third parties by addressing the symbolic implications of wrongdoing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 1070–1086.
9.
De Vel-PalumboM.WoodyattL.WenzelM. (2018). Why do we self-punish? Perceptions of the motives and impact of self-punishment outside the laboratory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 756–768.
10.
EnrightR. D., & The Human Development Study Group. (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In KurtinesW.GewirtzJ. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (Vol. 1, pp. 123–152). Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
FehrR.GelfandM. J. (2010). When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims’ self-construals facilitates forgiveness. Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes, 113, 37–50.
12.
FehrR.GelfandM. J.NagM. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914.
13.
FinkelE. J.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 956–974.
14.
FisherM. L.ExlineJ. J. (2010). Moving toward self-forgiveness: Removing barriers related to shame, guilt, and regret. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8), 548–558.
15.
ForsterD. E.BillingsleyJ.RussellV. M.McCauleyT. G.SmithA.BurnetteJ. L.McCulloughM. E. (2019). Forgiveness takes place on an attitudinal continuum from hostility to friendliness: Toward a closer union of forgiveness theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000227
16.
GriffinB. J.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.LavelockC. R.GreerC. L.LinY.DavisD. E.HookJ. N. (2015). Efficacy of a self-forgiveness workbook: A randomized controlled trial with interpersonal offenders. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 124–136.
17.
HairJ. F.AndersonR. E.BabinB. J.BlackW. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Pearson.
18.
HallJ. H.FinchamF. D. (2005). Self-forgiveness: The stepchild of forgiveness research. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 24, 621–637.
19.
HallJ. H.FinchamF. D. (2008). The temporal course of self-forgiveness. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 27, 174–202.
20.
HamiltonJ.GagneP. E.HancockG. R. (2003, April). The effect of sample size on latent growth models [Conference session]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, United States. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED476862.
21.
KarremansJ. C.Van LangeP. A. (2004). Back to caring after being hurt: The role of forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 207–227.
22.
KarremansJ. C.Van LangeP. A. (2008). The role of forgiveness in shifting from “me” to “we.”Self and Identity, 7, 75–88.
23.
KellnB. R.EllardJ. H. (1999). An equity theory analysis of the impact of forgiveness and retribution on transgressor compliance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 864–872.
24.
LomoreC. D.SpencerS. J.HolmesJ. G. (2007). The role of shared-values affirmation in enhancing the feelings of low self-esteem women about their relationships. Self and Identity, 6, 340–360.
25.
McCulloughM. E.LunaL. R.BerryJ. W.TabakB. A.BonoG. (2010). On the form and function of forgiving: Modeling the time-forgiveness relationship and testing the valuable relationships hypothesis. Emotion, 10, 358–376.
26.
McCulloughM. E.RootL. M.CohenA. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887–897.
27.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.RachalK. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.
28.
McNultyJ. K. (2011). The dark side of forgiveness: The tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 770–783.
29.
MooneyL.StrelanP.McKeeI. (2016). How forgiveness promotes offender pro-relational intentions: The mediating role of offender gratitude. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55, 44–64.
30.
OkimotoT. G.WenzelM. (2008). The symbolic meaning of transgressions: Towards a unifying framework of justice restoration. In HegtvedtK.Clay-WarnerJ. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 291–326). Emerald.
31.
OkimotoT. G.WenzelM. (2009). Punishment as restoration of group and offender values following a transgression: Value consensus through symbolic labelling and offender reform. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 346–367.
32.
PelucchiS.PaleariF.RegaliaC.FinchamF. D. (2013). Self-forgiveness in romantic relationships: It matters to both of us. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 541–549.
33.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W. (2012). The antecedents and consequences of interpersonal forgiveness: A meta-analytic review. Personal Relationships, 19, 304–325.
34.
SchumannK. (2018). The psychology of offering an apology: Understanding the barriers to apologizing and how to overcome them. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 74–78.
35.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132.
36.
TabachnickB.FidellL. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
37.
TurnerJ. C. (1987). The analysis of social influence. In TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 68–88). Basil Blackwell.
38.
WalkerM. U. (2006). Moral repair: Reconstructing moral relations after wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press.
39.
WenzelM.OkimotoT. G. (2010). How acts of forgiveness restore a sense of justice: Addressing status/power and value concerns raised by transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 401–417.
40.
WenzelM.OkimotoT. G. (2012). The varying meaning of forgiveness: Relationship closeness as a moderator of forgiveness effects on feelings of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 420–431.
41.
WenzelM.OkimotoT. G.FeatherN. T.PlatowM. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 375–389.
42.
WenzelM.OkimotoT. G.FeatherN. T.PlatowM. J. (2010). Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 909–930.
43.
WenzelM.TurnerJ. K.OkimotoT. G. (2010). Is forgiveness an outcome or initiator of sociocognitive processes? Rumination, empathy, and cognitive appraisals following a transgression. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 369–377.
44.
WenzelM.WoodyattL.HedrickK. (2012). No genuine self-forgiveness without accepting responsibility: Value reaffirmation as a key to maintaining positive self-regard. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 617–627.
45.
WhittonS. W.James-KangalN.RhoadesG. K.MarkmanH. J. (2018). Understanding couple conflict. In VangelistiA. L.PerlmanD. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 297–310). Cambridge University Press.
46.
WoodyattL.WenzelM. (2013a). Self-forgiveness and restoration of an offender following an interpersonal transgression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32, 225–259.
47.
WoodyattL.WenzelM. (2013b). The psychological immune response in the face of transgressions: Pseudo self-forgiveness and threat to belonging. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 951–958.
48.
WoodyattL.WenzelM. (2014). A needs-based perspective on self-forgiveness: Addressing threat to moral identity as a means of encouraging interpersonal and intrapersonal restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 125–135.
49.
WoodyattL.WenzelM.De Vel-PalumboM. (2017). Working through psychological needs following transgressions to arrive at self-forgiveness. In WoodyattL.WorthingtonE. L.WenzelJr., M.GriffinB. J. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of self-forgiveness (pp. 43–58). Springer.
50.
WoodyattL.WenzelM.FerberM. (2017). Two pathways to self-forgiveness: A hedonic path via self-compassion and a eudaimonic path via the reaffirmation of violated values. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 515–536.
51.
WorthingtonE. L.Jr. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. Brunner-Routledge.
52.
YoshimuraS. M.BoonS. D. (2018). Communicating revenge in interpersonal relationships. Lexington Books.
53.
YsseldykR.MathesonK.AnismanH. (2007). Rumination: Bridging a gap between forgivingness, vengefulness, and psychological health. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1573–1584.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
