Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Are underperforming women given less truthful, but kinder performance feedback (“white lies”) compared with equally underperforming men? We test this hypothesis by using a “benchmark” of truthful (objective) evaluation of performance and then either manipulating (Study 1) or measuring (Study 2) the extent to which the feedback given to women is upwardly distorted. In Study 1, participants were asked to guess the gender of an underperforming employee who had been given more or less truthful feedback. Participants overwhelmingly assumed that employees who had been told “white lies” were more likely to be women. In Study 2, in a naturalistic feedback paradigm, participants gave both quantitative and qualitative feedback to a male and a female writer directly. Participants upwardly distorted their original, gender-blind, quantitative evaluations of women’s work and gave more positive comments to women. The findings suggest that women may not receive the same quality of feedback as men.

Keywords

gender bias feedback lying equality white lies interpersonal decision making gender stereotypes bias

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amodio

D. M.

Devine

P. G.

(2006). Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.652

Ashford

S. J.

Cummings

L. L.

(1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(3), 370–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(83)90156-3

Ashkenas

Park

Pearce

(2017, August 24). Even with affirmative action, Blacks and Hispanics are more underrepresented at top colleges than 35 years ago. The New York Times. https://www.higheredtoday.org/2017/08/24/even-affirmative-action-blacks-hispanics-underrepresented-top-colleges-35-years-ago/

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

Belschak

F. D.

Den Hartog

D. N.

(2009). Consequences of positive and negative feedback: The impact on emotions and extra-role behaviors. Applied Psychology, 58(2), 274–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00336.x

Bergsieker

H. B.

Leslie

L. M.

Constantine

V. S.

Fiske

S. T.

(2012). Stereotyping by omission: Eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1214–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027717

Bernardin

H. J.

Tyler

C. L.

Villanova

(2009). Rating level and accuracy as a function of rater personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00472.x

Biernat

Danaher

(2012). Interpreting and reacting to feedback in stereotype-relevant performance domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.010

Biernat

Kobrynowicz

(1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.544

10.

Biernat

Manis

(1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5

11.

Biernat

Tocci

M. J.

Williams

J. C.

(2012). The language of performance evaluations: Gender-based shifts in content and consistency of judgment. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3(2), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611415693

12.

Biernat

Vescio

T. K.

(2002). She swings, she hits, she’s great, she’s benched: Implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202281006

13.

Brockner

Elkind

(1985). Self-esteem and reactance: Further evidence of attitudinal and motivational consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(4), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90035-6

14.

Camden

Motley

M. T.

Wilson

(1984). White lies in interpersonal communication: A taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48(4), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318409374167

15.

Carver

C. S.

Glass

D. C.

Katz

(1978). Favorable evaluations of Blacks and the handicapped: Positive prejudice, unconscious denial, or social desirability? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1978.tb00768.x

16.

Cheng

K. H. C.

Hui

C. H.

Cascio

W. F.

(2017). Leniency bias in performance ratings: The Big-Five correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00521

17.

Cohen

G. L.

Steele

C. M.

Ross

L. D.

(1999). The mentor’s dilemma: Providing critical Feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(10), 1302–1318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299258011

18.

Correll

Simard

(2016). Vague Feedback is holding women back. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/04/research-vague-feedback-is-holding-women-back

19.

Cox

S. S.

Marler

L. E.

Simmering

M. J.

Totten

J. W.

(2011). Giving feedback: Development of scales for the mum effect, discomfort giving feedback, and feedback medium preference. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23(4), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20094

20.

Crandall

C. S.

Bahns

A. J.

Warner

Schaller

(2011). Stereotypes as justifications of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1488–1498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211411723

21.

Dardenne

Dumont

Bollier

(2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764

22.

DePaulo

B. M.

Bell

K. L.

(1996). Truth and investment: Lies are told to those who care. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.703

23.

Devine

P. G.

(1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5

24.

Dumont

Sarlet

Dardenne

(2010). Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: Benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles, 62(7–8), 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9582-4

25.

Dweck

C. S.

Gilliard

(1975). Expectancy statements as determinants of reactions to failure: Sex differences in persistence and expectancy change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.6.1077

26.

Eagly

A. H.

Wood

(2012). Social role theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49

27.

Eckes

(2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47(3–4), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021020920715

28.

Erat

Gneezy

(2012). White lies. Management Science, 58(4), 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1449

29.

FeldmanHall

Dalgleish

Evans

Navrady

Tedeschi

Mobbs

(2016). Moral chivalry: Gender and harm sensitivity predict costly altruism. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 7(6), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616647448

30.

Fisher

C. D.

(1979). Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.5.533

31.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878

32.

Gino

Ayal

Ariely

(2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.04.005

33.

Glencoe/McGraw-Hill. (2005). Glencoe writer’s choice: Grammar and composition, Grade 9.

34.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.

35.

Guillemin

Holmstrom

L. L.

Garvin

(1979). Judging competence: Letters of recommendation for men and women faculties. The School Review, 87(2), 157–170.

36.

Harber

K. D.

(1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 622–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.622

37.

Harber

K. D.

Stafford

Kennedy

K. A.

(2010). The positive feedback bias as a response to self-image threat. The British Journal of Social Psychology / The British Psychological Society, 49(Pt. 1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X473956

38.

Heilman

M. E.

Lucas

J. A.

Kaplow

S. R.

(1990). Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90029-9

39.

Hentschel

Heilman

M. E.

Peus

C. V.

(2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011

40.

Hillman

L. W.

Schwandt

D. R.

Bartz

D. E.

(1990). Enhancing staff members’ performance through feedback and coaching. Journal of Management Development, 9(3), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719010135110

41.

Hyde

Linn

M. C.

(1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53

42.

Ilgen

D. R.

Davis

(2000). Bearing Bad News: Reactions to Negative Performance Feedback. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 550–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00031

43.

King

E. B.

Botsford

Hebl

M. R.

Kazama

Dawson

J. F.

Perkins

(2012). Benevolent sexism at work: Gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1835–1866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365902

44.

Kluger

A. N.

DeNisi

(1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

45.

Kray

L. J.

Kennedy

J. A.

Van Zant

A. B.

(2014). Not competent enough to know the difference? Gender stereotypes about women’s ease of being misled predict negotiator deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.06.002

46.

Lakens

(2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

47.

Lamarche

V. M.

Seery

M. D.

Kondrak

C. L.

Saltsman

T. L.

Streamer

(2020). Clever girl: Benevolent sexism and cardiovascular threat. Biological Psychology, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107781

48.

Larson

J. R.

(1989). The dynamic interplay between employees’ feedback-seeking strategies and supervisors’ delivery of performance feedback. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279075

49.

Lenney

(1977). Women’s self-confidence in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 84(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.1.1

50.

Lupoli

M. J.

Jampol

Oveis

(2017). Lying because we care: Compassion increases Prosocial lying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(7), 1026–1042. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000315

51.

Madera

J. M.

Hebl

M. R.

Martin

R. C.

(2009). Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1591–1599. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016539

52.

McKee

T. L. E.

Ptacek

J. T.

(2001). I’m afraid I have something bad to tell you: Breaking bad news from the perspective of the giver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 246–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00196.x

53.

Mendes

W. B.

Blascovich

Lickel

Hunter

(2002). Challenge and threat during social interactions with White and Black men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01467202028007007

54.

North

M. S.

Fiske

S. T.

(2013). Act your (old) age: Prescriptive, ageist biases over succession, consumption, and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 720–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213480043

55.

Olejnik

Algina

(2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8(4), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434

56.

Park

Judd

C. M.

(2005). Rethinking the link between categorization and prejudice within the social cognition perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 108–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2

57.

Pittinsky

T. L.

Shih

M. J.

Trahan

(2006). Identity cues: Evidence from and for intra-individual perspectives on positive and negative stereotyping. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(9), 2215–2239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00101.x

58.

Plant

E. A.

Hyde

J. S.

Keltner

Devine

P. G.

(2000). The Gender Stereotyping of Emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 81–92.

59.

Pronin

Gilovich

Ross

(2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111(3), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781

60.

Regan

D. T.

(1971). Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 627–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(71)90025-4

61.

Renne

K. S.

Allen

P. C.

(1976). Gender and the ritual of the door. Sex Roles, 2, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287249

62.

Richeson

J. A.

Shelton

J. N.

(2007). Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, and possibilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00528.x

63.

Rosell

M. C.

Hartman

S. L.

(2001). Self-presentation of beliefs about gender discrimination and feminism. Sex Roles, 44, 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012294129547

64.

Rudman

L. A.

Goodwin

S. A.

(2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494

65.

Schmader

Whitehead

Wysocki

V. H.

(2007). A linguistic comparison of letters of recommendation for male and female chemistry and biochemistry job applicants. Sex Roles, 57(7–8), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4

66.

Schneider

D. J.

(2005). The psychology of stereotyping (distinguished contributions in psychology). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nmd.0000180748.87223.92

67.

Stankov

Lee

(2008). Confidence and cognitive test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 961–976. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012546

68.

Stephan

W. G.

Stephan

C. W.

(1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x

69.

Stroessner

S. J.

Haines

E. L.

Sherman

J. W.

Kantrowitz

C. J.

(2010). Stereotype relevance moderates category activation: Evidence from the Indirect Category Accessibility Task (ICAT). Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610372144

70.

Swim

Borgida

Maruyama

Myers

D. G.

(1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409

71.

Turner

Edgley

Olmstead

(1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11(1), 69–89. http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1976-26015-001

72.

Vescio

T. K.

Gervais

S. J.

Snyder

Hoover

(2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(4), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.658

73.

Viki

G. T.

Abrams

Hutchison

(2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49(9–10), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025888824749

74.

Weisberg

Y. J.

De Young

C. G.

Hirsh

J. B.

(2011). Gender differences in personality across the ten aspects of the Big Five. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00178

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

4.97 MB

Gendered White Lies: Women Are Given Inflated Performance Feedback Compared With Men

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material