Reciprocity is a fundamental mechanism for sustained social relationships. Escalation-based theories suggest that reciprocity intensifies over time. In contrast, equity-based theories propose that people reciprocate behaviors in kind. We reconcile these conflicting perspectives by examining social exchanges across different cultural contexts. Using three complementary experiments, we investigate when, how, and why individuals in East Asian settings and those in North American settings differentially reciprocate positive versus negative behaviors over time. Study 1 demonstrated that in positively framed exchanges (i.e., giving) Americans escalated their reciprocity, but Singaporeans reciprocated in kind. However, in negatively framed exchanges (i.e., taking), Singaporeans escalated their reciprocity, but Americans reciprocated in kind. Study 2 replicated the results using Hong Kongers and showed that cultural differences in regulatory focus were associated with specific emotions (i.e., anxiety and happiness), which then escalated reciprocity. To establish causality, Study 3 manipulated regulatory focus within one culture and replicated the pattern of results.
AbbinkK.IrlenbuschB.RennerE. (2000). The moonlighting game: An experimental study on reciprocity and retribution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42(2), 265–277.
2.
AdamsG. (2005). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Enemyship in North American and West African worlds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 948–968.
3.
AdamsG.PlautV. C. (2003). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Friendship in North American and West African worlds. Personal Relationships, 10(3), 333–347.
4.
AnderssonL. M.PearsonC. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471.
5.
AryeeS.BudhwarP. S.ChenZ. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267–285.
6.
BaronR. A.NeumanJ. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22(3), 161–173.
7.
BarrettL. F.LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M. (2016). Handbook of emotions. Guilford Press.
8.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
9.
BelkR. W.BahnK. D.MayerR. N. (1982). Developmental recognition of consumption symbolism. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 4–17.
10.
Ben-AriO. T.FlorianV.MikulincerM. (1999). The impact of mortality salience on reckless driving: A test of terror management mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 35–45.
11.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142.
12.
BishopJ. W.ScottK. D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 439–450.
13.
BlauP. M. (1964). Social exchange theory. Wiley.
14.
BlauP. M. (1968). Interaction: Social exchange. In BlauP. M. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 7, pp. 452–458). Macmillan.
15.
BlessH.MackieD. H.SchwartzN. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585–595.
16.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
17.
Bourgeois-GirondeS.CorcosA. (2011). Discriminating strategic reciprocity and acquired trust in the repeated trust-game. Economics Bulletin, 31(1), 177–188.
18.
BowerG. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129–148.
19.
BowerG. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgments. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 31–53). Psychology Press.
20.
BowlesS.GintisH. (2003). Origins of human cooperation. In HammersteinP. (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp. 429–443). MIT Press.
21.
BradleyB. P.MoggK.FallaS. J.HamiltonL. R. (1998). Attentional bias for threatening facial expressions in anxiety: Manipulation of stimulus duration. Cognition and Emotion, 12(6), 737–753.
22.
BrownR. (1986). Social psychology. Free Press.
23.
BuchanN. R.CrosonR. T.DawesR. M. (2002). Swift neighbors and persistent strangers: A cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocity in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 168–206.
24.
BurgerJ. M. (1986). Increasing compliance by improving the deal: The that’s-not-all technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 277–283.
25.
CamachoC. J.HigginsE. T.LugerL. (2003). Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 498–510.
26.
CarverC. S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 105–110.
27.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press.
28.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246.
29.
CharnessG.HaruvyE.SonsinoD. (2007). Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63, 88–103.
30.
ChenJ.ChiuC.-y.ChanS. F. (2009). The cultural effects of job mobility and the belief in a fixed world: Evidence from performance forecast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 851–865.
31.
CheungT. T.GillebaartM.KroeseF.De RidderD. (2014). Why are people with high self-control happier? The effect of trait self-control on happiness as mediated by regulatory focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 722.
32.
CialdiniR. B.BaumannD. J.KenrickD. T. (1981). Insights from sadness: A three step model of the development of altruism as hedonism. Developmental Review, 1, 207–223.
33.
CialdiniR. B.DarbyB.VincentJ. (1973). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 502–516.
34.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
35.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101–109.
36.
CortinaL. M.MagleyV. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 247–265.
37.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2005). Neurocognitive adaptations designed for social exchange. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 584–627). John Wiley.
38.
CropanzanoR.AnthonyE. L.DanielsS. R.HallA. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479–516.
39.
DavieM. (1929). The evolution of warfare. Yale University Press.
40.
DawsonG.PanagiotidesH.KlingerL. G.HillD. (1992). The role of frontal lobe functioning in the development of infant self-regulatory behavior. Brain and Cognition, 20(1), 152–175.
41.
EisenbergerR.ArmeliS.RexwinkelB.LynchP. D.RhoadesL. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51.
42.
El-AlayliA.MesséL. A. (2004). Reactions toward an unexpected or counternormative favor-giver: Does it matter if we think we can reciprocate?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), 633–641.
43.
ElfenbeinD. W.ZengerT. R. (2013). What is a relationship worth? Repeated exchange and the development and deployment of relational capital. Organization Science, 25(1), 222–244.
44.
ElliotA. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 10(7), 143–179.
45.
FaddegonK.ScheepersD.EllemersN. (2008). If we have the will, there will be a way: Regulatory focus as a group identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 880–895.
46.
FalkC. F.HeineS. J.YukiM.TakemuraK. (2009). Why do Westerners self-enhance more than East Asians?European Journal of Personality, 23(3), 183–203.
47.
FarrellD.RusbultC. E. (1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28(1), 78–95.
48.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
49.
FehrE.FischbacherU.GächterS. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1–25.
50.
FehrE.GächterS. (1998). Reciprocity and economics: The economic implications of Homo Reciprocans1. European Economic Review, 42(3–5), 845–859.
51.
FehrE.GächterS. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 159–181.
52.
FergusonA. J.PetersonR. S. (2015). Sinking slowly: Diversity in propensity to trust predicts downward trust spirals in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1012–1024.
53.
FolgerR.SkarlickiD. P. (1998). When tough times make tough bosses: Managerial distancing as a function of layoff blame. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 79–87.
54.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.
55.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterF. (2008). Activation and measurement of motivational states. In ElliotA. J. (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 235–246). Psychology Press.
56.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.DuanL.AlmaliachA.AngS.ArnadottirJ. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104.
57.
GilbertD. T.HixonJ. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 509–517.
58.
GlombT. M.LiaoH. (2003). Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 486–496.
59.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin Books.
60.
GordonS. L. (1981). The sociology of sentiments and emotion. Basic Books.
61.
GormanC. A.MeriacJ. P.OverstreetB. L.ApodacaS.McIntyreA. L.ParkP.GodbeyJ. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of the regulatory focus nomological network: Work-related antecedents and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 160–172.
62.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.
63.
GrayJ. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). Springer.
64.
GrayJ. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–288.
65.
GrecoL. M.WhitsonJ. A.O’BoyleE. H.WangC. S.KimJ. (2019). An eye for an eye? A meta-analysis of negative reciprocity in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(9), 1117–1143.
66.
HalevyN.WeiselO.BornsteinG. (2012). “In-group love” and “out-group hate” in repeated interaction between groups. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(2), 188–195.
67.
HamamuraT.HeineS. J. (2008). The role of self-criticism in self-improvement and face maintenance among Japanese. In ChangE. C. (Ed.), Self-criticism and self-enhancement: Theory, research, and clinical implication (pp. 105–122). American Psychological Association.
68.
Harmon-JonesE.Harmon-JonesC.AbramsonL.PetersonC. K. (2009). PANAS positive activation is associated with anger. Emotion, 9(2), 183–196.
69.
HarrisK. J.KacmarK. M.ZivnuskaS. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 252–263.
70.
HashimotoH.YamagishiT. (2013). Two faces of interdependence: Harmony seeking and rejection avoidance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(2), 142–151.
71.
HeiderF. (2013). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Psychology Press.
72.
HeineS. J.LehmanD. R.MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?Psychological Review, 106(4), 766–794.
73.
HelmB.BonomaT. V.TedeschiJ. T. (1972). Reciprocity for harm done. The Journal of Social Psychology, 87(1), 89–98.
74.
HendersonL. S.StackmanR. W.LindekildeR. (2018). Why cultural intelligence matters on global project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 36(7), 954–967.
75.
HershcovisM. S.BarlingJ. (2010). Comparing victim attributions and outcomes for workplace aggression and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 874–888.
76.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.
77.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300.
78.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217–1230.
79.
HigginsE. T.ShahJ.FriedmanR. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 515–525.
80.
HigginsE. T.SpiegelS. (2004). Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (Vol. 15, pp. 171–187). Guilford Press.
81.
HirtE. R.DeversE. E.McCreaS. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 214–230.
82.
HochschildA. (1983). Comment on Kemper’s “Social constructionist and positivist approaches to the sociology of emotions.”University of Chicago Press.
83.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41.
84.
HomanG. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt, Brace & World.
85.
HumphreyS. E.AimeF.CushenberyL.HillA. D.FairchildJ. (2017). Team conflict dynamics: Implications of a dyadic view of conflict for team performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 142, 58–70.
86.
IsenA. M. (1987). Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 203–253). Elsevier.
87.
JohnsonP. D.SmithM. B.WallaceJ. C.HillA. D.BaronR. A. (2015). A review of multilevel regulatory focus in organizations. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1501–1529.
88.
KellerJ.HurstM.UskulA. (2008). Prevention-focused self-regulation and aggressiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 800–820.
89.
KemperT. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 330–342.
90.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
91.
KeysarB.ConverseB. A.WangJ.EpleyN. (2008). Reciprocity is not give and take asymmetric reciprocity to positive and negative acts. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1280–1286.
92.
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.MatsumotoH.NorasakkunkitV. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245–1267.
93.
KlenkM. M.StraumanT. J.HigginsE. T. (2011). Regulatory focus and anxiety: A self-regulatory model of GAD-depression comorbidity. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 935–943.
94.
KrullJ. L.MacKinnonD. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(2), 249–277.
95.
LanceC. E.VandenbergR. J.SelfR. M. (2000). Latent growth models of individual change: The case of newcomer adjustment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 107–140.
96.
LawlerE. J.ThyeS. R. (1999). Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 217–244.
97.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852.
98.
LeeA. Y.AakerJ. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205–218.
99.
LeeA. Y.AakerJ. L.GardnerW. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1122–1134.
100.
LeithK. P.BaumeisterR. F. (1996). Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk tasking, and self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1250–1267.
101.
LeungA. K.-y.ChiuC.-y.HongY.-y. (2011). Cultural processes: A social psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
102.
LevittS. R. (2015). Cultural factors affecting international teamwork dynamics. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change in Organizations: Annual Review, 13, 9–23.
103.
LeymannH. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence & Victims, 5(2), 119–126.
104.
LiL. M. W.AdamsG.KurtişT.HamamuraT. (2015). Beware of friends: The cultural psychology of relational mobility and cautious intimacy. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 124–133.
105.
LiL. M. W.MasudaT. (2016). The role of regulatory focus in how much we care about enemies: Cross-cultural comparison between European Canadians and Hong Kong Chinese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(1), 131–148.
106.
LockwoodP.JordanC. H.KundaZ. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854–864.
107.
LockwoodP.MarshallT. C.SadlerP. (2005). Promoting success or preventing failure: Cultural differences in motivation by positive and negative role models. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 379–392.
108.
LoydD. L.WangC. S.PhillipsK. W.LountR. B. (2013). Social category diversity promotes pre-meeting elaboration: The role of relationship focus. Organization Science, 24, 757–772.
109.
LyonsB. J.ScottB. A. (2012). Integrating social exchange and affective explanations for the receipt of help and harm: A social network approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 66–79.
110.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
111.
McCabeK. A.RigdonM. L.SmithV. L. (2003). Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2), 267–275.
112.
MitchellM. M. (2000). Able but not motivated? The relative effects of happy and sad mood on persuasive message processing. Communication Monographs, 67, 215–226.
113.
MitchellM. S.AmbroseM. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168.
114.
MolinskyA. (2007). Cross-cultural code-switching: The psychological challenges of adapting behavior in foreign cultural interactions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 622–640.
115.
MorrisM. W.HongY.-y.ChiuC.-y.LiuZ. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1–13.
116.
NisbettR. E.CohenD. (1996). Culture of honor. Westview Press.
117.
OffermanT. (2002). Hurting hurts more than helping helps. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1423–1437.
118.
OishiS.KesebirS. (2012). Optimal social-networking strategy is a function of socioeconomic conditions. Psychological Science, 23(12), 1542–1548.
119.
OishiS.KislingJ. (2009). The mutual constitution of residential mobility and individualism. In WyerR. S.ChiuC.-y.HongY.-y. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 223–238). Psychology Press.
120.
OttD. L.MichailovaS. (2018). Cultural intelligence: A review and new research avenues. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 99–119.
121.
OtterbeinK. (1970). The evolution of war. HRAF Press.
122.
PerryN. S.BaucomK. J.BourneS.ButnerJ.CrenshawA. O.HoganJ. N.ImelZ. E.WiltshireT.BaucomB. R. (2017). Graphic methods for interpreting longitudinal dyadic patterns from repeated-measures actor–partner interdependence models. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(5), 592–603.
123.
PeruginiM.GallucciM.PresaghiF.ErcolaniA. P. (2003). The personal norm of reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 17(4), 251–283.
124.
PillutlaM. M.MurnighanJ. K. (1996). Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 208–224.
125.
PorterL. W.SteersR. M.MowdayR. T.BoulianP. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603–609.
126.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
127.
RindB.StrohmetzD. (1999). Effect on restaurant tipping of a helpful message written on the back of customers’ checks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 139–144.
128.
RockenbachB.MilinskiM. (2006). The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature, 444(7120), 718–723.
129.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.
130.
San MartinA.SchugJ.MadduxW. (2019). Relational mobility and cultural differences in analytic and holistic thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(4), 495–518.
131.
SatoK.YukiM.NorasakkunkitV. (2014). A socio-ecological approach to cross-cultural differences in the sensitivity to social rejection: The partially mediating role of relational mobility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(10), 1549–1560.
132.
ScheffT. J. (1983). Toward integration in the social psychology of emotions. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 333–354.
133.
SchugJ.YukiM.HorikawaH.TakemuraK. (2009). Similarity attraction and actually selecting similar others: How cross-societal differences in relational mobility affect interpersonal similarity in Japan and the USA. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 95–103.
134.
SchugJ.YukiM.MadduxW. (2010). Relational mobility explains between-and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1471–1478.
135.
SchwarzN. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In HigginsE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 527–561). Guilford Press.
136.
SchwarzN. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 433–440.
137.
SettoonR. P.BennettN.LidenR. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.
138.
ShahJ.HigginsE. T. (2001). Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 693–705.
139.
SinghR.SimonsJ.SelfW.TetlockP.BellP.OngP.KaurS. (2011). Cultural and developmental differences in norm and meta-norm enforcement: Does collective blame compensate for individual blame? In SinghP.BainP.LeongC. H.MisraG.OhtsuboY. (Eds.), Psychological, group, and cultural processes in changing societies: Progress in Asian social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 109–122). Macmillan.
140.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845–851.
141.
StraussW. A. (1977). Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 55(2), 149–162.
142.
TiedensL. Z.LintonS. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988.
143.
TsaiJ. L.KnutsonB.FungH. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 288–307.
144.
Tumey-HighH. H. (1971). Primitive war: Its practice and concepts. University of South Carolina Press.
145.
UskulA. K.ShermanD. K.FitzgibbonJ. (2009). The cultural congruency effect: Culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed health messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 535–541.
146.
VanVoorhisC. W.MorganB. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50.
147.
VästfjällD.GärlingT.KleinerM. (2001). Does it make you happy feeling this way? A core affect account of preference for current mood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(4), 337–354.
148.
WangC. S.GalinskyA. D.MurnighanJ. K. (2009). Bad drives psychological reactions but good propels behavior: Reactions to honesty and deception. Psychological Science, 20, 634–644.
149.
WangC. S.LeungA. K.-y. (2010). The cultural dynamics of rewarding honesty and punishing deception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1529–1542.
150.
WangC. S.SivanathanN.NarayananJ.GanegodaD.BauerM.BodenhausenG. V.MurnighanJ. K. (2011). Retribution and emotional regulation: The effect of time delay in angry economic interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 46–54.
151.
WangX.GuinoteA.KrumhuberE. G. (2018). Dominance biases in the perception and memory for the faces of powerholders, with consequences for social inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 23–33.
152.
WeberL.BaumanC. W. (2019). The cognitive and behavioral impact of promotion and prevention contracts on trust in repeated exchanges. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 361–382.
153.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1034–1048.
154.
WhitsonJ. A.KimJ.WangC. S.MenonT.WebsterB. D. (2019). Regulatory focus and conspiratorial perceptions: The importance of personal control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 3–15.
155.
WhitsonJ. A.WangC. S.KimJ.CaoJ.ScrimpshireA. (2015). Responses to normative and norm-violating behavior: Culture, job mobility, and social inclusion and exclusion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 24–35.
156.
WhitsonJ. A.WangC. S.SeeY.-H. M.BakerW.MurnighanJ. K. (2015). How, when, and why recipients and observers reward good deeds and punish bad deeds. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 84–95.
157.
WilliamsL. J.AndersonS. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617.
158.
WrightW. F.BowerG. H. (1992). Mood effects on subjective probability assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(2), 276–291.
159.
ZandD. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239.
160.
ZhangY.MittalV. (2007). The attractiveness of enriched and impoverished options: Culture, self-construal, and regulatory focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 588–598.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
