Dehumanizing Prisoners: Remaining Sentence Duration Predicts the Ascription of Mind to Prisoners

Abstract

We tested the novel hypothesis that the dehumanization of prisoners varies as a function of how soon they will be released from prison. Seven studies indicate that people ascribe soon-to-be-released prisoners greater mental sophistication than those with more time to serve, all other things being equal. Studies 3 to 6 indicate that these effects are mediated by perceptions that imprisonment has served the functions of rehabilitation, retribution, and future deterrence. Finally, Study 7 demonstrates that beliefs about rehabilitation and deterrence may be the most important in accounting for these effects. These findings indicate that the amount of time left on a prison sentence influences mind ascription to the incarcerated, an effect that has implications for our understanding of prisoner dehumanization.

Keywords

prisoners dehumanization incarceration mind perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

H. E.

Simonsen

C. E.

(2001). Corrections in America. Prentice Hall.

Bastian

Denson

T. F.

Haslam

(2013). The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLOS ONE, 8, Article e61842.

Benson

(2003). Rehabilitate or punish? Psychologists are not only providing treatment to prisoners; they’re also contributing to debate over the nature of prison itself. American Psychological Association, 34(7), 46.

Binnall

J. M.

(2008). Respecting beasts: The dehumanizing quality of the modern prison and unusual model for penal reform. Journal of Law and Policy, 17, 161–190.

Buckels

E. E.

Trapnell

P. D.

(2013). Disgust facilitates outgroup dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 771–780.

Carlsmith

K. M.

Darley

J. M.

Robinson

P. H.

(2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299.

Castano

Giner-Sorolla

(2006). Not quite human: Infra-humanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804–818.

Deska

J. C.

Almaraz

S. M.

Hugenberg

(2020). They’re all the same to me: Homogeneous groups are denied mind [Manuscript in preparation].

Deska

J. C.

Lloyd

E. P.

Hugenberg

(2018). Facing humanness: Facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 75–94.

10.

Epley

Akalis

Waytz

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychological Science, 19, 114–120.

11.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

12.

Fincher

K. M.

Kteily

N. S.

Bruneau

E. G.

(2018). Our humanity contains multitudes: Dehumanization is more than overlooking mental capacities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, E3329–E3330.

13.

Fincher

K. M.

Tetlock

P. E.

(2016). Perceptual dehumanization of faces is activated by norm violations and facilitates norm enforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 131–146.

14.

Frith

C. D.

(2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358, 459–473.

15.

Galtung

(1958). The social functions of a prison. Social Problems, 6, 127–140.

16.

Giner-Sorolla

Leidner

Castano

(2012). Dehumanization, demonization, and morality shifting: Paths to moral certainty in extremist violence. In Hogg

M. A.

Blaylock

D. L.

(Eds.), Extremism and the psychology of uncertainty (pp. 165–182). Wiley-Blackwell.

17.

Goff

P. A.

Eberhardt

J. L.

Williams

M. J.

Jackson

M. C.

(2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292–306.

18.

Gray

H. M.

Gray

Wegner

D. M.

(2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619–619.

19.

Haney

Zimbardo

(1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford Prison Experiment. American Psychologist, 53, 709–727.

20.

Harris

L. T.

Fiske

S. T.

(2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Psychological Science, 17, 847–853.

21.

Haslam

(2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264.

22.

Haslam

Loughnan

(2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423.

23.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29–29.

24.

Kant

(1965). The metaphysics of morals ( Ladd

, Trans.). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. (Original work published 1797)

25.

Kelman

H. G.

(1973). Violence without moral restraint: Reflections on the dehumanization of victims and victimizers. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 25–61.

26.

Khalid

Deska

J. C.

Hugenberg

(2016). The eyes are the windows to the mind: Direct eye gaze triggers the ascription of others’ minds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1666–1677.

27.

Kifer

Hemmens

Stohr

M. K.

(2003). The goals of correction: Perspectives from the line. Criminal Justice Review, 28, 47–69.

28.

Kozak

M. N.

Marsh

A. A.

Wegner

D. M.

(2006). What do I think you’re doing? Action identification and mind attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 543–555.

29.

Kteily

Bruneau

Waytz

Cotterill

(2015). The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 901–931.

30.

Lackey

. (2019, February 6). The measure of a country is how it treats its prisoners. The U.S. is failing. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-measure-of-a-country-is-how-it-treats-its-prisoners-the-us-is-failing/2019/02/06/8df29acc-2a1c-11e9-984d-9b8fba003e81_story.html

31.

Leyens

J. P.

Demoulin

Vaes

Gaunt

Paladino

M. P.

(2007). Infra-humanization: The wall of group differences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 139–172.

32.

Leyens

J. P.

Paladino

P. M.

Rodriguez-Torres

Vaes

Demoulin

Rodriguez-Perez

Gaunt

(2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197.

33.

Maoz

McCauley

(2008). Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 93–116.

34.

Montoya

A. K.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psychological Methods, 22, 6–27.

35.

Myers

Godwin

Latter

Winstanley

(2004). Victim impact statements and mock juror sentencing. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 22, 39–55.

36.

Osofsky

M. J.

Bandura

Zimbardo

P. G.

(2005). The role of moral disengagement in the execution process. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 371–393.

37.

Powers

K. E.

Worsham

A. L.

Freeman

J. B.

Wheatley

Heatherton

T. F.

(2014). Social connection modulates perceptions of animacy. Psychological Science, 25, 1943–1948.

38.

Rai

T. S.

Valdesolo

Graham

(2017). Dehumanization increases instrumental violence, but not moral violence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 8511–8516.

39.

Simon

(2015, April 9). Prison is punishment enough. But in the US, inmates also face violence and humiliation. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/apr/09/prison-punishment-violence-humiliation

40.

Simons

D. J.

Shoda

Lindsay

D. S.

(2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128.

41.

Tan

Xiao

(2018). Third-party punishment: Retribution or deterrence? Journal of Economic Psychology, 67, 34–46.

42.

Taylor

S. E.

Repetti

R. L.

Seeman

(1997). Health psychology: What is an unhealthy environment and how does it get under the skin? Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 411–447.

43.

Vaes

Leyens

J. P.

Paola Paladino

Pires Miranda

(2012). We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 64–106.

44.

Vasiljevic

Viki

G. T.

(2014). Dehumanization, moral disengagement, and public attitudes to crime and punishment. In Bain

P. G.

Vaes

Leyens

J.-P.

(Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 129–146). Psychology Press.

45.

Viki

G. T.

Fullerton

Raggett

Tait

Wiltshire

(2012). The role of dehumanization in attitudes toward the social exclusion and rehabilitation of sex offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2349–2367.

46.

Viki

G. T.

Osgood

Phillips

(2013). Dehumanization and self-reported proclivity to torture prisoners of war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 325–328.

47.

Waytz

Morewedge

C. K.

Epley

Monteleone

Gao

J. H.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(2010). Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 410–435.

48.

Wilson

J. P.

Rule

N. O.

(2015). Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 26, 1325–1331.

49.

Zebel

Zimmermann

Viki

G. T.

Doosje

(2008). Dehumanization and guilt as distinct but related predictors of support for reparation policies. Political Psychology, 29, 193–219.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB