Honor is abstract. We predict that people make sense of honor metaphorically as an up–right position in space and that endorsing honor values makes this metaphor more accessible. Supporting our prediction, people in China (Study 1) and the United States (Studies 1–4) associate honor with up and right and dishonor with down and left, controlling for the association of positive with up–right (Studies 3, 4). We document downstream consequences for choice and perception of this metaphoric representation. Regarding choice, Americans who endorse honor values and voted for then-candidate Trump prefer photographs in which President Trump is positioned in the up–right quadrant (Study 5). Images from conservative news websites position the President’s face in the up–right quadrant more than nonconservative ones (Study 6). Regarding perception, Americans who rate President Trump as honorable are more likely to perceive him as facing up and to the right in news website images (Study 7).
Bar-AnanY.LibermanN.TropeY. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609–622.
2.
BrunelF. F.TietjeB. C.GreenwaldA. G. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test a valid and valuable measure of implicit consumer social cognition?Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 385–404.
3.
CasasantoD. (2009a). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367.
4.
CasasantoD. (2009b). When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor. In EvansV.PourcelS. (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (Vol. 24, pp. 127–145). John Benjamins.
5.
CianL.KrishnaA.SchwarzN. (2015). Positioning rationality and emotion: Rationality is up and emotion is down. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 632–651.
6.
CohenD.NisbettR. E.BowdleB. F.SchwarzN. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 945–960.
7.
CrawfordL.MargoliesS. M.DrakeJ. T.MurphyM. E. (2006). Affect biases memory of location: Evidence for the spatial representation of affect. Cognition and Emotion, 20(8), 1153–1169.
8.
CrossS. E.UskulA. K.Gerçek-SwingB.SunbayZ.AlözkanC.GünsoyC.AtacaB.Karakitapoğlu-AygünZ. (2014). Cultural prototypes and dimensions of honor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 232–249.
9.
FettermanA. K.JuhlJ.MeierB. P.AbeytaA.RoutledgeC.RobinsonM. D. (2019). The path to God is through the heart: Metaphoric self-location as a predictor of religiosity. Self and Identity, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1651389
10.
FrimerJ. A.SinclairL. (2016). Moral heroes look up and to the right. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(3), 400–410.
GreenS. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510.
13.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464–1480.
14.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216.
15.
IJzermanH.CohenD. (2011). Grounding cultural syndromes: Body comportment and values in honor and dignity cultures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 456–467.
16.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486.
17.
LandauM. J. (2016). Conceptual metaphor in social psychology: The poetics of everyday life. Routledge.
18.
LandauM. J.MeierB. P.KeeferL. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045–1067.
19.
LeungA. K. Y.CohenD. (2011). Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 507–526.
20.
MeierB. P.HauserD. J.RobinsonM. D.FriesenC. K.SchjeldahlK. (2007). What’s “up” with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 699–710.
21.
MeierB. P.RobinsonM. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247.
22.
MeierB. P.SellbomM.WygantD. B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 757–767.
23.
NisbettR. E.CohenD. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Westview Press.
24.
NovinS.OysermanD. (2016). Honor as cultural mindset: Activated honor mindset affects subsequent judgment and attention in mindset-congruent ways. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1921.
25.
NowakA.GelfandM. J.BorkowskiW.CohenD.HernandezI. (2016). The evolutionary basis of honor cultures. Psychological Science, 27(1), 12–24.
26.
OysermanD. (2011). Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology, 22(1), 164–214.
27.
OysermanD. (2017). Culture three ways: Culture and subcultures within countries. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 435–463.
28.
OysermanD.YanV. X. (2019). Making meaning: A culture-as-situated cognition approach to the consequences of cultural fluency and disfluency. In KitayamaS.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 536–565). Guilford Press.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis method. SAGE.
31.
RichardsonD. C.SpiveyM. J.BarsalouL. W.McRaeK. (2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780.
32.
RichardsonD. C.SpiveyM. J.EdelmanS.NaplesA. D. (2001). “Language is spatial”: Experimental evidence for image schemas of concrete and abstract verbs. In MooreJ. D.StenningK. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 873–878). Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Rodriguez MosqueraP. M. (2013). In the name of honor. On virtue, reputation, and violence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(3), 271–388.
34.
Rodriguez MosqueraP. M.MansteadA.FischerA. (2002). Honor in the Mediterranean and northern Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 16–36.
35.
Rodriguez MosqueraP. M.UskulA. K.CrossS. E. (2011). The centrality of social image in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 403–410.
36.
SalomonE.CimpianA. (2014). The inherence heuristic as a source of essentialist thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(10), 1297–1315.
37.
SchnallS. (2014). Are there basic metaphors? In LandauM. J.RobinsonM. D.MeierB. P. (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 225–247). American Psychological Association.
38.
SchubertT. W. (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1–21.
39.
Sev’erA.YurdakulG. (2001). Culture of honor, culture of change: A feminist analysis of honor killings in rural Turkey. Violence Against Women, 7(9), 964–998.
UskulA. K.OysermanD.SchwarzN.LeeS. W. S.XuA. J. (2013). How successful you have been in life depends on the response scale used: The role of cultural mindsets in pragmatic inferences drawn from question format. Social Cognition, 31, 222–236.
42.
Van VoorhisC.MorganB. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3, 43–50.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
