This research shows that the two most prevalent religious constructs—God and religion—differentially impact cognition. Activating thoughts about God (vs. religion) induces a relatively more abstract (vs. concrete) mindset (Studies 1a–1c). Consequently, time donation intentions (Study 2) and actual monetary donations (Study 3) after a God (vs. religion) prime increase when people are presented an abstractly (vs. concretely) framed donation appeal. Similarly, people donate more money to distant (vs. close) donation targets, which are construed relatively abstractly (vs. concretely), when a religious speech activates predominantly God-specific (vs. religion-specific) thoughts (Study 4). These effects are mediated by “feeling right” under construal level fit (Study 3). Overall, this research significantly advances extant knowledge on religious cognition and past research on the link between religion and prosociality.
AhmedA.HammarstedtM. (2011). The effect of subtle religious representations on cooperation. International Journal of Social-Economics, 38, 900–910.
2.
AhmedA.SalasO. (2013). Religious context and prosociality: An experimental study from Valparaíso, Chile. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 627–637.
3.
AhmedA. M.SalasO. (2011). Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner’s dilemma game decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 242–246.
4.
Bar-AnanY.LibermanN.TropeY. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 609–622.
5.
BaronJ. (1994). Nonconsequentialist decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 1–10.
6.
BataraJ. B. L.FrancoP. S.QuiachonM. A. M.SembreroD. R. M. (2016). Effects of religious priming concepts on prosocial behavior towards ingroup and outgroup. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12, 635–644.
7.
BatsonC. D.OlesonK. C.WeeksJ. L.HealyS. P.ReevesP. J.JenningsP.BrownT. (1989). Religious prosocial motivation: Is it altruistic or egoistic?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 873–884.
8.
BatsonC. D.SchoenradeP.VentisW. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.
9.
BekkersR.SchuytT. (2008). And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands. Review of Religious Research, 50, 74–96.
10.
BellahR. N. (1964). Religious evolution. American Sociological Review, 29, 358–374.
11.
BoyerP. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. Basic Books.
12.
BrooksA. C. (2006). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. Basic Books.
13.
BurkertW. (1996). Creation of the sacred: Tracks of biology in early religions. Harvard University Press.
14.
CarrollJ.DudleyC.McKinneyW. (1986). Handbook for congregational studies. Abingdon Press.
15.
CesarioJ.HigginsE. T. (2008). Making message recipients “feel right”: How nonverbal cues can increase persuasion. Psychological Science, 19, 415–420.
16.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682–696.
17.
DurkheimE. (1995). The elementary forms of the religious life. Free Press. (Original work published 1912)
18.
EyalT.LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204–1209.
19.
FreitasA. L.GollwitzerP.TropeY. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752.
20.
FujitaK.HendersonM. D.EngJ.TropeY.LibermanN. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278–282.
21.
GalenL. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876–906.
22.
GervaisW. M.NorenzayanA. (2012). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 298–302.
23.
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2010). Blaming God for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 7–16.
24.
GuttmannJ. (1984). Cognitive morality and cheating behavior in religious and secular school children. The Journal of Educational Research, 77, 249–254.
25.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
26.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
27.
HigginsE. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439–460.
28.
JohnsonD.KrugerO. (2004). The good of wrath: Supernatural punishment and the evolution of cooperation. Political Theology, 5, 159–176.
29.
JohnsonM. K.RowattW. C.LaBouffJ. (2010). Priming Christian religious concepts increases racial prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 119–126.
30.
KimH.RaoA. R.LeeA. Y. (2008). It’s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 877–889.
31.
LaurinK.KayA. C.FitzsimonsG. M. (2012). Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 4–18.
32.
LeeA. Y.KellerP. A.SternthalB. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 735–747.
33.
LibermanN.SagristanoM. D.TropeY. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.
34.
LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201–1205.
35.
LibermanN.TropeY.McCreaS. M.ShermanS. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 143–149.
36.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L. (1999). Religion and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 1141–1164.
37.
McKayR.EffersonC.WhitehouseH.FehrE. (2011). Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1858–1863.
38.
MedinD.OrtonyA. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In VosniadouS.OrtonyA. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179–195). Cambridge University Press.
39.
MenegattiM.RubiniM. (2013). Convincing similar and dissimilar others: The power of language abstraction in political communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 596–607.
40.
MorganS. P. (1983). A research note on religion and morality: Are religious people nice people?Social Forces, 61, 683–692.
41.
NowellC.LauferD. (1997). Undergraduate student cheating in the fields of business and economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 28, 3–12.
42.
PergamentK. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford Press.
43.
PichonI.BoccatoG.SaroglouV. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1045.
44.
PichonI.SaroglouV. (2009). Religion and helping: Impact of target thinking styles and just-world beliefs. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 31, 215–236.
45.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S. (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1471–1483.
46.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S.HernandezJ. I. (2010). Principles of religious prosociality: A review and reformulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 574–590.
47.
RamsayJ. E.TongE. M.PangJ. S.ChowdhuryA. (2016). A puzzle unsolved: Failure to observe different effects of God and religion primes on intergroup attitudes. PLOS ONE, 11, e0147178.
48.
Randolph-SengB.NielsenM. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 303–315.
49.
RitterR. S.PrestonJ. L. (2013). Representations of religious words: Insights for religious priming research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 52, 494–507.
50.
SaroglouV. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15–25.
51.
SaroglouV. (2006). Religion’s role in prosocial behavior: Myth or reality?Religion, 31, 1–66.
52.
SasakiJ. Y.KimH. S.MojaverianT.KelleyL. D.ParkI. Y.JanušonisS. (2013). Religion priming differentially increases prosocial behavior among variants of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 209–215.
53.
SchweikerW. F. (1969). Religion as a superordinate meaning system and socio-psychological integration. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 8, 300–307.
54.
SeminG. R.FiedlerK. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558–568.
55.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809.
56.
ShariffA. F.WillardA. K.AndersenT.NorenzayanA. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 27–48.
57.
SmithR. E.WheelerG.DienerE. (1975). Faith without works: Jesus people, resistance to temptation, and altruism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 320–330.
58.
SosisR.RuffleB. J. (2004). Ideology, religion, and the evolution of cooperation. Socioeconomic Aspects of Human Behavioral Ecology, 23, 89–117.
59.
StavrovaO.SiegersP. (2014). Religious prosociality and morality across cultures: How social enforcement of religion shapes the effects of personal religiosity on prosocial and moral attitudes and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 315–333.
60.
StephanE.LibermanN.TropeY. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 268–280.
61.
StephanE.LibermanN.TropeY. (2011). The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 397–402.
62.
SunsteinC. R. (2005). Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 531–541.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.
65.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.
66.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660–671.
67.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M.McMahanS. C.CotterJ.LarsenK. A. (1992). On winning friends and influencing people: Action identification and self-presentation success. Social Cognition, 10, 335–355.
68.
YanD.SenguptaJ.HongJ. (2016). Why does psychological distance influence construal level? The role of processing mode. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 598–613.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
