This meta-analysis explored the magnitude of self-serving attribution biases for real-world athletic outcomes. A comprehensive literature search identified 69 studies (160 effect sizes; 10,515 athletes) that were eligible for inclusion. Inverse-variance weighted random-effects meta-analysis showed that sport performers have a tendency to attribute personal success to internal factors and personal failure to external factors (k = 40, standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.62), a tendency to attribute team success to factors within the team and team failure to factors outside the team (k = 23, SMD = 0.63), and a tendency to claim more personal responsibility for team success and less personal responsibility for team failure (k = 4, SMD = 0.28). There was some publication bias and heterogeneity in computed averages. Random effects meta-regression identified sample sex, performance level, and world-region as important moderators of pooled mean effects. These findings provide a foundation for theoretical development of self-serving tendencies in real-world settings.
AbramsonL. Y.SeligmanM. E. P.TeasdaleJ. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.
2.
*AikenJ. M.McClureJ.SiegertR. J. (1998). Outcome and game closeness effects upon individual and team sports attributions. New Zealand Journal of Sports Medicine, 26, 2–9.
3.
*AjayiM. A.IpinmorotiA. O. (2001). Post-game attribution dilemmas of undergraduate students during the Nigerian university games. Journal of International Council for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance, 37, 59–61.
4.
*AldridgeL. J.IslamM. R. (2012). Cultural differences in athlete attributions for success and failure: The sports pages revisited. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 67–75.
5.
AllenM. S. (2010). On the temporal dynamics of causal attribution in competitive sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3, 3–23.
6.
AllenM. S. (2012). A systematic review of content themes in sport attribution research: 1954–2011. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 1–8.
7.
AllenM. S.CoffeeP.GreenleesI. (2012). A theoretical framework and research agenda for studying team attributions in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5, 121–144.
8.
*AllenM. S.JonesM. V.SheffieldD. (2009). Attribution, emotion, and collective efficacy in sports teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13, 205–217.
9.
*AuvergneS. (1983). Motivation and causal attribution for high and low achieving athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 14, 85–91.
10.
BaumeisterR.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
11.
*BelciugM. P. (1992). Effects of prior expectancy and performance outcome on attributions to stable factors in high-performance competitive athletics. South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education & Recreation, 14, 1–8.
12.
BiddleS. J. H.HanrahanS. J.SellarsC. N. (2001). Attributions: Past, present, and future. In SingerR. N.HausenblasH. A.JanelleC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (2nd ed., pp. 444–471). Wiley.
13.
*BiddleS. J. H.HillA. B. (1992). Attributions for objective outcome and subjective appraisal of performance: Their relationship with emotional reactions in sport. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 215–226.
14.
*BirdA. M.BrameJ. M. (1978). Self versus team attributions: A test of the “I’m ok, but the team’s so-so” phenomenon. Research Quarterly, 49, 260–268.
15.
*BirdA. M.FosterC. D.MaruyamaG. (1980). Convergent and incremental effects of cohesion on attributions for self and team. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 181–194.
16.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.
17.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ.RothsteinH. R. (2014). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 3.0 [Computer software]. National Institutes of Health.
18.
*BrawleyL. R. (1984). Unintentional egocentric biases in attributions. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 264–278.
19.
*BukowskiW. M.MooreD. (1980). Winners’ and losers’ attributions for success and failure in a series of athletic events. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 195–210.
20.
BurgerJ. M.RodmanJ. L. (1983). Attributions of responsibility for group tasks: The egocentric bias and the actor-observer difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1232–1242.
21.
CampbellW. K.SedikidesC. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23–43.
22.
CarronA. V.ColmanM. M.WheelerJ.StevensD. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24, 168–188.
23.
CarronA. V.EysM. A. (2012). Group dynamics in sport (4th ed.). Fitness Information Technology.
24.
*CarronA. V.SpinkK. S. (1980). The stability of causal attributions. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 5, 19–24.
25.
CarterE. C.SchönbrodtF. D.GervaisW. M.HilgardJ. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 115–144.
26.
CarusoE. M.EpleyN.BazermanM. H. (2006). The cost and benefits of undoing egocentric responsibility assessments in groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 857–871.
27.
*ChowG. M.FeltzD. L. (2008). Exploring the relationships between collective efficacy, perceptions of success, and team attributions. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26, 1179–1189.
28.
ChungS.LountR. B.ParkH. M.ParkE. S. (2018). Friends with performance benefits: A meta-analysis on the relationship between friendship and group performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 63–79.
29.
*CoffeeP.GreenleesI.AllenM. S. (2015). The TRAMS: The team-referent attributions measure in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 150–159.
30.
*CoffeeP.ReesT. (2008a). The CSGU: A measure of controllability, stability, globality, and universality attributions. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 611–641.
31.
*CoffeeP.ReesT. (2008b). Main and interactive effects of controllability and generalisability attributions upon self-efficacy. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 775–785.
32.
*CoffeeP.ReesT. (2009). The main and interactive effects of immediate and reflective attributions upon subsequent self-efficacy. European Journal of Sport Science, 9, 41–52.
33.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
34.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
35.
*CroxtonJ. S.KlonskyB. G. (1982). Sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure in real and hypothetical sport settings. Sex Roles, 8, 399–409.
36.
*De MicheleP. E.GansnederB.SolomonG. B. (1998). Success and failure attributions of wrestlers: Further evidence of the self-serving bias. Journal of Sport Behavior, 21, 242–255.
37.
*DithurbideL.SullivanP.ChowG. (2009). Examining the influence of team-referent causal attributions and team performance on collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis. Small Group Research, 40, 491–507.
38.
*DummerG. M.EwingM. E.HabeckR. V.OvertonS. R. (1987). Attributions of athletes with cerebral palsy. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 4, 278–292.
39.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98.
40.
EggerM.Davey SmithG.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634.
41.
*FelsonR. (1981). The attributions of actors and observers concerning performance in a football game. The Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 15–23.
42.
FieldingK. S.HoggM. A.AnnandaleN. (2006). Reactions to positive deviance: Social identity and attribution dimensions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 199–218.
43.
FörsterlingF.MorgensternM. (2002). Accuracy of self-assessment and task performance: Does it pay to know the truth?Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 576–585.
44.
ForsythD. R.BergerR. E.MitchellT. (1981). The effects of self-serving vs. other-serving claims of responsibility on attraction and attribution in groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 59–64.
45.
*ForsythD. R.SchlenkerB. R. (1977). Attributional egocentrism following performance of a competitive task. Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 215–222.
46.
FriezeI. H.WhitleyB. E.HanusaB. H.McHughM. C. (1982). Assessing the theoretical models for sex differences in causal attributions for success and failure. Sex Roles, 8, 333–343.
47.
FurleyP. (2019). What modern sports competitions can tell us about human nature. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 138–155.
48.
*FurstD. M. (1989). Attributional consistency and subjective perceptions of success. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 529–530.
49.
*GillD. L.RuderM. K.GrossJ. B. (1982). Open-ended attributions in team competition. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 159–169.
50.
*Gonzalez-BotoR.MolineroO.MartinezR.MarquezS. (2006). Attributions for success and failure in Spanish team sport players. European Journal of Human Movement, 17, 123–134.
51.
*GreenT. D.HolemanS. (2004). Athletes’ attributions for team performance: A theoretical test across sports and genders. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 199–206.
52.
*GreenleesI.JonesS.HolderT.ThelwellR. (2006). The effects of self-handicapping on attributions and perceived judo competence. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, 273–280.
53.
*GreenleesI.LaneA.ThelwellR.HolderT.HobsonG. (2005). Team-referent attributions among sport performers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 477–487.
54.
*GreenleesI.StopforthM.GraydonJ.ThelwellR.FilbyW.El-HakimY. (2007). The impact of match importance and gender on the team-serving attributional bias among interdependent sports team players. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 54–65.
55.
*GroveJ. R.HanrahanS. J.McInmanA. (1991). Success/failure bias in attributions across involvement categories in sport. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 93–97.
56.
*GroveJ. R.PrapavessisH. (1995). The effect of skill level and sport outcomes on dimensional aspects of causal attributions. Australian Psychologist, 30, 92–95.
57.
*HamiltonP. R.JordanJ. S. (2000). Most successful and least successful performances: Perceptions of causal attributions in high school track athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 245–254.
58.
HastorfA. H.CantrilH. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129–134.
59.
HastorfA. H.SchneiderD. J.PolefkaJ. (1970). Person perception. Addison-Wesley.
60.
HeiderF. (1976). A conversation with Fritz Heider. In HarveyJ. H.IckesW. J.KiddR. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 47–61). Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal327(7414), 557–560.
62.
*Iso-AholaS. E. (1977a). Effects of team outcome on children’s self-perception: Little League baseball. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 38–42.
63.
*Iso-AholaS. E. (1977b). Immediate attributional effects of success and failure in the field: Testing some laboratory hypotheses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 275–296.
64.
*KimiecikJ. C.DudaJ. L. (1985). Self-serving attributions among children in a competitive sport setting: Some theoretical and methodological considerations. Journal of Sport Behavior, 8, 78–91.
65.
KwanV. S.JohnO. P.KennyD. A.BondM. H.RobinsR. W. (2004). Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 111, 94–110.
66.
LearyM. R.ForsythD. R. (1987). Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes (pp. 167–188). SAGE.
67.
*LefebvreL. M. (1979). Achievement motivation and causal attribution in male and female athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 10, 31–41.
68.
*LeithL. M.PrapavessisH. (1989). Attributions of causality and dimensionality associated with sport outcomes in objectively evaluated and subjectively evaluated sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 20, 224–234.
69.
*MarkM. M.MutrieN.BrooksD. R.HarrisD. V. (1984). Causal attributions of winners and losers in individual competitive sports: Toward a reformulation of the self-serving bias. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 184–196.
70.
MartinL. J.CarronA. V. (2012). Team attributions in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 24, 157–174.
71.
*McAuleyE. (1985). Success and causality in sport: The influence of perception. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 13–22.
72.
McAuleyE.DuncanT. E.RussellD. W. (1992). Measuring causal attributions: The revised Causal Dimension Scale (CDSII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 566–573.
73.
*McAuleyE.GrossJ. B. (1983). Perceptions of causality in sport: An application of the causal dimension scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 72–76.
74.
*McGowanR. W.McGowanS. J.OmifadeA. (1997). Cultural effects: Attributions following ruminations of success and failure. Psychological Reports, 81, 155–159.
75.
McShaneB. B.BöckenholtU.HansenK. T. (2016). Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis: An evaluation of selection methods and some cautionary notes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 730–749.
76.
MezulisA. H.AbramsonL. Y.HydeJ. S.HankinB. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711–747.
77.
MillerD. T.RossM. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225.
78.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269.
79.
MullenB.RiordanC. A. (1988). Self-serving attributions for performance in naturalistic settings: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 3–22.
80.
*MurrayR. M.CoffeeP.ArthurC. A.EklundR. C. (2019). Social identity moderates the effects of team-referent attributions on collective efficacy but not emotions. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology.
81.
PigottT. D. (1994). Methods for handling missing data in research synthesis. In CooperH.HedgesL. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 163–178). Russell Sage Foundation.
82.
*PolmanR.RowcliffeN.BorkolesE.LevyA. (2007). Precompetitive state anxiety, objective and subjective performance, and causal attributions in competitive swimmers. Pediatric Exercise Science, 19, 39–50.
83.
*ReesT. (2007). Main and interactive effects of attribution dimensions on efficacy expectations in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 473–480.
84.
ReesT.IngledewD. K.HardyL. (2005). Attribution in sport psychology: Seeking congruence between theory, research and practice. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 189–204.
85.
*RiessM.TaylorJ. (1984). Ego-involvement and attributions for success and failure in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 536–543.
86.
*RiordanC. A.ThomasJ. S.JamesM. K. (1985). Attributions in a one-on-one sports competition: Evidence for self-serving biases and gender differences. Journal of Sport Behavior, 8, 42–53.
87.
*RobinsonD. W.HoweB. L. (1987). Causal attribution and mood state relationships of soccer players in a sport achievement setting. Journal of Sport Behavior, 10, 137–146.
88.
*RoeschS. C.AmirkhanJ. H. (1997). Boundary conditions for self-serving attributions: Another look at the sports pages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 245–261.
89.
*RossM.SicolyF. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–336.
90.
*SantamariaV. L.FurstD. M. (1994). Distance runners’ causal attributions for most successful and least successful races. Journal of Sport Behavior, 17, 43–51.
91.
*ScanlanT. K.PasserM. W. (1980a). The attributional responses of young female athletes after winning, tying, and losing. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 51, 675–684.
92.
*ScanlanT. K.PasserM. W. (1980b). Self-serving biases in the competitive sport setting: An attributional dilemma. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 124–136.
93.
SchlenkerB. R.SoraciS.McCarthyB. (1976). Self-esteem and group performance as determinants of egocentric perceptions in cooperative groups. Human Relations, 29, 1163–1176.
94.
SchwingerM.WirthweinL.LemmerG.SteinmayrR. (2014). Academic self-handicapping and achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 744–761.
95.
*ShapcottK. M.CarronA. V.GreenleesI.El HakimY. (2010). Determinants of team-referent attributions: A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 8, 227–244.
96.
*ShermanD. K.KimH. S. (2005). Is there an “I” in “team”? The role of the self in group-serving judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 108–120.
97.
SmurdaJ. D.WittigM. A.GokalpG. (2006). Effects of threat to a valued social identity on implicit self-esteem and discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 181–197.
98.
*SpinkK. S. (1978). Win-loss causal attributions of high school basketball players. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 3, 195–201.
99.
*SpinkK. S.RobertsG. C. (1980). Ambiguity of outcome and causal attributions. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 237–244.
100.
*StoeberJ.BeckerC. (2008). Perfectionism, achievement motives, and attribution of success and failure in female soccer players. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 980–987.
101.
SwannC.MoranA.PiggottD. (2015). Defining elite athletes: Issues in the study of expert performance in sport psychology. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 3–14.
102.
*SzczepaniakJ.GuszkowskaM. (2016). Causal attributions of success and failure and mood States in football players. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, 23, 202–206.
103.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Brooks/Cole.
104.
*TaylorD. M.DoriaJ. R. (1981). Self-serving and group-serving bias in attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 201–211.
105.
*TaylorD. M.DoriaJ. R.TylerJ. K. (1983). Group performance and cohesiveness: An attribution analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 119, 187–198.
106.
*TenenbaumG.FurstD. (1985). The relationship between sport achievement responsibility, attribution and related situational variables. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 16, 254–269.
107.
*Van RaalteJ. L. (1994). Sport performance attributions: A special case of self-serving bias?Australian Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 26, 45–48.
108.
*VlachopoulosS.BiddleS. J. H.FoxK. (1996). A social-cognitive investigation into the mechanisms of affect generation in children’s physical activity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 174–193.
109.
*VlachopoulosS.BiddleS. J. H.FoxK. (1997). Determinants of emotion in children’s physical activity: A test of goal perspectives and attribution theories. Pediatric Exercise Science, 9, 65–79.
110.
WeinerB. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.
111.
WeinerB. (2018). The legacy of an attribution approach to motivation and emotion: A no-crisis zone. Motivation Science, 4, 4–14.
112.
*WillimczikK.RethorstS.RiebelH. J. (1986). Cognition’s and emotions in sports games—A cross-cultural comparative analysis. International Journal of Physical Education, 23, 10–16.
113.
*WilsonM. A.StephensD. E. (2005). Great expectations: How do athletes of different expectancies attribute their perception of personal athletic performance?Journal of Sport Behavior, 28, 392–406.
114.
*ZaccaroS. J.PetersonC.WalkerS. (1987). Self-serving attributions for individual and group performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 257–263.
115.
*ZientekC. E.BreakwellG. M. (1991). Attributional schema of players before and after knowledge of game outcome. Journal of Sport Behavior, 14, 211–222.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
