Zuckerman et al. (2013) conducted a meta-analysis of 63 studies that showed a negative intelligence–religiosity relation (IRR). As more studies have become available and because some of Zuckerman et al.’s (2013) conclusions have been challenged, we conducted a new meta-analysis with an updated data set of 83 studies. Confirming previous conclusions, the new analysis showed that the correlation between intelligence and religious beliefs in college and noncollege samples ranged from −.20 to −.23. There was no support for mediation of the IRR by education but there was support for partial mediation by analytic cognitive style. Thus, one possible interpretation for the IRR is that intelligent people are more likely to use analytic style (i.e., approach problems more rationally). An alternative (and less interesting) reason for the mediation is that tests of both intelligence and analytic style assess cognitive ability. Additional empirical and theoretical work is needed to resolve this issue.
BertschS.PestaB. J. (2009). The Wonderlic Personnel Test and elementary cognitive tasks as predictors of religious sectarianism, scriptural acceptance and religious questioning. Intelligence, 37, 231-237. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.10.003
2.
Blanchard-FieldsF.HertzogC.SteinR.PakR. (2001). Beyond a stereotyped view of older adults’ traditional family values. Psychology and Aging, 16, 483-496. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.3.483
3.
CheungM. W.-L. (2007). Comparison of approaches to constructing confidence intervals for mediating effects using structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 227-246. doi:10.1080/10705510709336745
4.
CheungM. W.-L. (2015). MetaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1521. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521
CheungM. W.-L.HongR. Y. (2017). Applications of meta-analytic structural equation modelling in health psychology: Examples, issues, and recommendations. Health Psychology Review, 11, 265-279.
7.
*ClarkR. (2004). Religiousness, spirituality, and IQ: Are they linked?Explorations: An Undergraduate Research Journal, 7, 35-46.
8.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
*DawsR. R.HampshireA. (2017). The negative relationship between reasoning and religiosity is underpinned by a bias for intuitive responses specifically when intuition and logic are in conflict. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2191. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02191
10.
DuttonE. (2014). Religion and intelligence: An evolutionary analysis. London, England: Ulster Institute for Social Research.
11.
DuttonE.Van der LindenE. (2017). Why is intelligence negatively associated with religiousness?Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3, 392-403. doi:10.1007/s40806-017-0101-0
12.
EpsteinS. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 708-724. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
*GanzachY.GotlibovskiC. (2013). Intelligence and religiosity: Within families and over time. Intelligence, 41, 546-552. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.003
15.
HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2018). Choosing between random effects models in meta-analysis: Units of analysis and the generalizability of obtained results. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12, e12414.
16.
HallJ. A.Tickle-DegnenL.RosenthalR.MostellerF. (1993). Hypotheses and problems in research synthesis. In CooperH.HedgesL. V. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 17-28). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
*HartmanR. O.DieckmannN. F.SprengerA. M.StastnyB. J.DeMarreeK. G. (2017). Modeling attitudes toward science: Development and validation of the Credibility of Science Scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 358-371. doi:10.1080/01973533.2017.1372284
18.
*HeavenP. C. L.CiarrochiJ.LeesonP. (2011). Cognitive ability, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation: A five-year longitudinal study amongst adolescents. Intelligence, 39, 15-21. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.12.001
19.
Huedo-MedinaT. B.Sánchez-MecaJ.Marín-MartínezF.BotellaJ. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?Psychological Methods, 11, 193-206.
20.
KahnemanD. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
21.
KanazawaS. (2010). Why liberals and atheists are more intelligent. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 33-57. doi:10.1177/0190272510361602
22.
*KirkegaardE. O. W.BjerrekaerJ. D. (2016). The OKCupid dataset: A very large public dataset of dating site users. Open Differential Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.26775/ODP.2016.11.03
23.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Applied Social Research Methods Series: Practical meta-analysis (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
McCulloughM. E.EndersC. K.BrionS. L.JainA. R. (2005). The varieties of religious development in adulthood: A longitudinal investigation of religion and rational choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 78-89. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.78
25.
McPhetresJ.ZuckermanM. (2018). Religiosity predicts negative attitudes towards science and lower levels of science literacy. PLoS ONE, 13, e0207125.
26.
NyborgH. (2009). The intelligence–religiosity nexus: A representative study of white adolescent Americans. Intelligence, 37, 81-93. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.003
27.
O’ConnorT. P.HogeD. R.AlexanderE. (2002). The relative influence of youth and adult experiences on personal spirituality and church involvement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 723-732.
28.
PennycookG. (2014). Evidence that analytic cognitive style influences religious belief: Comment on Razmyar and Reeve (2013). Intelligence, 43, 21-26. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.005
29.
*PennycookG.CheyneJ. A.BarrN.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2014a). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 188-214. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
30.
*PennycookG.CheyneJ. A.BarrN.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2014b). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1-10. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
31.
*PennycookG.CheyneJ. A.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2013). Belief bias during reasoning among religious believers and skeptics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 806-811. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0394-3
32.
*PennycookG.RossR. M.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2016). Atheists and agnostics are more reflective than religious believers: Four empirical studies and a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11, e0153039. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153039
33.
*PeralesF. (2018). The cognitive roots of prejudice towards same-sex couples: An analysis of an Australian national sample. Intelligence, 68, 117-127. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.012
34.
*PolletE.SchnellT. (2017). Brilliant: But what for? Meaning and subjective well-being in the lives of intellectually gifted and academically high-achieving adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 1459-1484. doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9783-4
35.
*RazmyarS.ReeveC. L. (2013). Individual differences in religiosity as a function of cognitive ability and style. Intelligence, 41, 667-673. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.09.003
36.
*RitchieS. J.GowA. J.DearyI. J. (2014). Religiosity is negatively associated with later-life intelligence, but not with age-related cognitive decline. Intelligence, 46, 9-17. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2014.04.005
37.
*RossR. M. (2015). Cognitive and evolutionary foundations of culture and belief (PhD thesis). Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
38.
*SacherS. G. (2015). An investigation of the link between spirituality and intelligence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
39.
SackettP. R.KuncelN. R.ArnesonJ. J.CooperS. R.WatersS. D. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the relationship between SAT® and freshman GPA: An analysis of data from 41 colleges and universities (College Board Research Report No. 2009-1). New York, NY: The College Board.
40.
SackettP. R.YangH. (2000). Correction for range restriction: An expanded typology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 112-118. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.112
41.
*SaribayS. A.YilmazO. (2017). Analytic cognitive style and cognitive ability differentially predict religiosity and social conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 114, 24-29. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.056
42.
SchwadelP. (2016). Does higher education cause religious decline? A longitudinal analysis of the within- and between-person effects of higher education on religiosity. The Sociological Quarterly, 57, 759-786. doi:10.1111/tsq.12153
43.
SherkatD. E. (2011). Religion and scientific literacy in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 1134-1150. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00811.x
*StahlT.van ProoijenJ. W. (2018). Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 155-163. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.026
46.
StanovichK. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In EvansJ. S. B. T.FrankishK. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55-88). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47.
StanovichK. E. (2018). Miserliness in human cognition: The interaction of detection, override and mindware. Thinking and Reasoning, 24, 423-444.
48.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-655. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00003435
49.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F.ToplakM. E. (2016). The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
ThorndikeR. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
51.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
52.
WahligE. L. (2005). Health outcomes in multiple sclerosis: The role of beliefs and personality in cognitive function, depression, fatigue, and quality of life (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The State University of New York at Buffalo.
53.
WebsterG. D.DuffyR. D. (2016). Losing faith in the intelligence-religiosity link: New evidence for a decline effect, spatial dependence, and mediation by education and life quality. Intelligence, 55, 15-27. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.01.001
54.
ZuckermanM.LiC.DienerE. F. (2018). Religion as an exchange system: The interchangeability of god and government in a provider role. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 1201-1213.
55.
*ZuckermanM.McPhetresJ. (2016). Unpublished data.
56.
ZuckermanM.SilbermanJ.HallJ. A. (2013). The relation between intelligence and religiosity: A meta-analysis and some proposed explanations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 325-354. doi:10.1177/1088868313497266
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
