Justice Agents: Discriminated Group Members Are Perceived to be Highly Committed to Social Justice

Abstract

We propose that because members of discriminated (vs. advantaged) groups have a history of dealing with injustice, majority group members expect them to be more committed to social justice. By commitment to social justice, we mean supporting, and caring for, the basic rights of virtually any marginalized group. Studies 1a (N = 145) and 1b (N = 120) revealed that members of discriminated (vs. relatively advantaged) groups were seen as having a stronger commitment to social justice. This was explained by participants’ perception of discriminated groups as having a tradition of fighting injustice (Study 2; N = 174). Demonstrating implications of these perceptions, discriminated (relative to advantaged) group members were assigned more justice-related roles in the workplace (Study 3a: N = 120; Study 3b: N = 126; Study 4: N = 133), and their justice-related initiatives were rated more negatively (Study 5: N = 259). Theoretical and practical implications regarding minority–majority relations and minorities’ ability to advance in workplace hierarchies are discussed.

Keywords

discrimination social-justice minorities inequality diversity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

B. J.

(1995). “Diversity”; and organizational communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 23, 143-155. doi:10.1080/00909889509365420

Chattopadhyay

Tluchowska

George

(2004). Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Academy of Management Review, 29, 180-202.

Cooke

R. A.

(1989). Assessing managerial skills with the “Management effectiveness profile system.” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 723-732.

Craig

M. A.

Richeson

J. A.

(2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 759-777.

Crosby

J. R.

Monin

(2013). How the opinions of racial minorities influence judgments of discrimination. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 334-345.

Crosby

J. R.

Monin

Richardson

(2008). Where do we look during potentially offensive behavior? Psychological Science, 19, 226-228.

Fernández

Branscombe

N. R.

Saguy

Gómez

Morales

J. F.

(2014). Higher moral obligations of tolerance toward other minorities: An extra burden on stigmatized groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 363-376.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. C.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

Gatrell

Swan

(2008). Gender and diversity in management: A concise introduction. London, England: SAGE.

10.

Gutiérrez

A. S.

Unzueta

M. M.

(2013). Are admissions decisions based on family ties fairer than those that consider race? Social dominance orientation and attitudes toward legacy vs. affirmative action policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 554-558.

11.

Hekman

D. R.

Johnson

Der Foo

Yang

(2017). Does diversity-valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for non-white and female leaders? Academy of Management Journal, 60, 771-797. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0538

12.

Kaiser

C. R.

Pratt-Hyatt

J. S.

(2009). Distributing prejudice unequally: Do Whites direct their prejudice toward strongly identified minorities? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 432-445.

13.

Park

S. H.

Westphal

J. D.

(2013). Social discrimination in the corporate elite: How status affects the propensity for minority CEOs to receive blame for low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 542-586.

14.

Powell

G. N.

Butterfield

D. A.

(1994). Investigating the “glass ceiling” phenomenon: An empirical study of actual promotions to top management. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 68-86.

15.

Rudman

L. A.

Fairchild

(2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157-176.

16.

Warner

R. H.

Branscombe

N. R.

(2012). Observer perceptions of moral obligations in groups with a history of victimization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 882-894. doi:10.1177/0146167212439212

17.

Warner

R. H.

Wohl

M. J. A.

Branscombe

N. R.

(2014). When do victim group members feel a moral obligation to help suffering others? European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 231-241. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2010

18.

Wenneras

Wold

(2001). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. In Wyer

(Ed.), Women, science, and technology: A reader in feminist science studies (pp. 46-52). New York, NY: Routledge.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.61 MB