History is rife with examples of the dark side of creativity—ingenious weapons, novel torture practices, and creative terrorist attacks—yet its psychological origins are sparsely addressed and poorly understood. Building on work showing that social threat induces focused thinking as well as aggressive cognitions and readiness to fight, we propose that threats lead to more malevolent creativity and less creativity in threat-irrelevant domains. Prisoner’s dilemma games were modified to evoke threat of exploitation. Participants then generated novel brick uses (Study 1, N = 113) or negotiation tactics (Study 2;N = 79). High (vs. low) social threat led to more “malevolent” creativity (e.g., using bricks as weapons; using intimidation as negotiation tactic). Social threat reduced nonthreat-related creative ideation only in Study 1. Study 2 showed that the increase of malevolent creativity was due to the motivation to defend and aggress, and emerged especially among individuals with a high need for cognition.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
2.
AshbyF. G.IsenA. M.TurkenA. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529-550.
3.
BaasM.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779-806.
4.
BaasM.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794-809.
5.
BaasM.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2012). Emotions that associate with uncertainty lead to structured thinking. Emotion, 12, 1004-1014.
6.
BerkowitzL. (1990). On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression: A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. American Psychologist, 45, 494-503.
7.
BlanchardD. C.GriebelG.PobbeR.BlanchardR. J. (2011). Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 991-998.
8.
BroadbentD. E. (1972). Decision and stress. New York, NY: Academic Press.
9.
BruinsJ. J.LiebrandW. B.WilkeH. A. M. (1989). About the salience of fear and greed in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 155-161.
10.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.FeinsteinJ. A.JarvisW. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
11.
CarverC. S.SuttonS. K.ScheierM. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741-751.
12.
ChajutE.AlgomD. (2003). Selective attention improves under stress: Implications for theories of social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 231-248.
13.
ChengY.BaasM.De DreuC. K. W. (2018). Creative responses to imminent threats: The role of threat direction and perceived effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 174-186.
14.
ChermahiniS. A.HommelB. (2010). The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115, 458-465.
15.
CoombsC. H. (1973). A reparameterization of the prisoner’s dilemma game. Behavioral Science, 18, 424-428.
16.
CropleyD. H.KaufmanJ. C.CropleyA. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105-115.
17.
De DreuC. K. W.BaasM.NijstadB. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739-756.
18.
De DreuC. K. W.GreerL. L.HandgraafM. J. J.ShalviS.Van KleefG. A.BaasM.FeithS. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 134, 1408-1410.
19.
De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2008). Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: Threat rigidity versus motivated focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 648-661.
20.
De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A.BaasM.WolsinkI.RoskesM. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation, and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 656-669.
21.
DerryberryD.ReedM. A. (1998). Anxiety and attentional focusing: Trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 745-761.
22.
DixonA. K. (1998). Ethological strategies for defence in animals and humans: Their role in some psychiatric disorders. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71, 417-445.
23.
EasterbrookJ. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201.
24.
ElliotA. J. (2008). Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
25.
EvansJ. S. B. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459.
26.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
27.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2010). Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 875-893.
28.
GawronskiB.CesarioJ. (2013). Of mice and men: What animal research can tell us about context effects on automatic responses in humans. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 187-215.
29.
GiebelsE.De DreuC. K. W.Van de VliertE. (1998). The alternative negotiator as the invisible third at the table: The impact of potency information. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 5-21.
30.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
31.
HaoN.TangM.YangJ.WangQ.RuncoM. A. (2016). A new tool to measure malevolent creativity: The malevolent creativity behavior scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 682.
32.
HarrisD. J.Reiter-PalmonR. (2015). Fast and furious: The influence of implicit aggression, premeditation, and provoking situations on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 54-64.
33.
HarrisD. J.Reiter-PalmonR.KaufmanJ. C. (2013). The effect of emotional intelligence and task type on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 237-244.
34.
HirtE. R.DeversE. E.McCreaS. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 214-230.
35.
HuguetP.GalvaingM. P.MonteilJ. M.DumasF. (1999). Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011-1025.
36.
IoannouM. C.MoggK.BradleyB. P. (2004). Vigilance for threat: Effects of anxiety and defensiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1879-1891.
37.
JamesK.ClarkK.CropanzanoR. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211-226.
38.
KochS.HollandR. W.HengstlerM.van KnippenbergA. (2009). Body locomotion as regulatory process: Stepping backward enhances cognitive control. Psychological Science, 20, 549-550.
39.
LeeS.DowG. (2011). Malevolent creativity: Does personality influence malicious divergent thinking?Creativity Research Journal, 23, 73-82.
40.
LippO. V.WatersA. M. (2007). When danger lurks in the background: Attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. Emotion, 7, 192-200.
41.
LucasB. J.NordgrenL. F. (2015). People underestimate the value of persistence for creative performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 232-243.
42.
MarksI. M.NesseR. M. (1994). Fear and fitness: An evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 247-261.
43.
MednickS. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
44.
MobbsD.HaganC. C.DalgleishT.SilstonB.PrévostC. (2015). The ecology of human fear: Survival optimization and the nervous system. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, Article 55.
45.
NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T.SchallerM. (2011). Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1042-1051.
46.
NijstadB. A.De DreuC. K. W.RietzschelE. F.BaasM. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34-77.
47.
OhmanA.FlyktA.EstevesF. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting a snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 69-82.
48.
PallyS. (1955). Cognitive rigidity as a function of threat. Journal of Personality, 23, 346-355.
49.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
50.
ReineckeA.BeckerE. S.RinckM. (2009). Selective visual working memory in fear of spiders: The role of automaticity and material-specificity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 1053-1063.
51.
RoskesM.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2012). Necessity is the mother of invention: Avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 242-256.
52.
StawB. M.SandelandsL. E.DuttonJ. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501-524.
53.
WoodyE. Z.SzechtmanH. (2011). Adaptation to potential threat: The evolution, neurobiology, and psychopathology of the security motivation system. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1019-1033.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
