We investigated whether stereotypes linking Black men and Black boys with violence and criminality generalize to Black women and Black girls. In Experiments 1 and 2, non-Black participants completed sequential-priming tasks wherein they saw faces varying in race, age, and gender before categorizing danger-related objects or words. Experiment 3 compared task performance across non-Black and Black participants. Results revealed that (a) implicit stereotyping of Blacks as more dangerous than Whites emerged across target age, target gender, and perceiver race, with (b) a similar magnitude of racial bias across adult and child targets and (c) a smaller magnitude for female than male targets. Evidence for age bias and gender bias also emerged whereby (d) across race, adult targets were more strongly associated with danger than were child targets, and (e) within Black (but not White) targets, male targets were more strongly associated with danger than were female targets.
AmodioD. M.Harmon-JonesE.DevineP. G.CurtinJ. J.HartleyS. L.CovertA. E. (2004). Neural signals for the detection of unintentional race bias. Psychological Science, 15, 88-93.
2.
ArcherJ. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 4, 291-322.
3.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
4.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
5.
BraverS. L.ThoemmesF. J.RosenthalR. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333-342.
6.
BuckelsE. E.BeallA. T.HoferM. K.LinE. Y.ZhouZ.SchallerM. (2015). Individual differences in activation of the parental care motivational system: Assessment, prediction, and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 497-514.
7.
CesarioJ.JohnsonD. J.TerrillW. (2018). Is there evidence of racial disparity in police use of deadly force? Analyses of officer-involved fatal shootings in 2015-2016. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550618775108
8.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170-180.
9.
CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314-1329.
10.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770-789.
11.
CrenshawK. W.OcenP.NandaJ. (2015). Black girls matter: Pushed out, overpoliced and underprotected. New York, NY: Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies.
12.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
13.
DonovanR. A. (2011). Tough or tender: (Dis)similarities in White college students’ perceptions of Black and White women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 458-468.
14.
EaglyA. H.MladinicA. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
15.
EaglyA. H.SteffenV. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309-330.
16.
EpsteinR.BlakeJ. J.GonzalezT. (2017). Girlhood interrupted: The erasure of Black girls’ childhood. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Law Center on Poverty and Inequality.
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
18.
GalinskyA. D.HallE. V.CuddyA. J. C. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24, 498-506.
19.
GawronskiB.PetersK. R.LeBelE. P. (2008). What makes mental associations personal or extra-personal? Conceptual issues in the methodological debate about implicit attitude measures. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1002-1023.
20.
GhavamiN.PeplauL. A. (2013). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 113-127.
21.
GoffP. A.JacksonM. C.Di LeoneB. A. L.CulottaC. M.DiTomassoN. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 526-545.
22.
GoffP. A.ThomasM. A.JacksonM. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, 59, 392-403.
23.
HallA. V.HallE. V.PerryJ. L. (2016). Black and blue: Exploring racial bias and law enforcement in the killings of unarmed Black male civilians. American Psychologist, 71, 175-186.
24.
JacobyL. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
25.
JohnsonK. L.FreemanJ. B.PaukerK. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 116-131.
26.
JonesC. R.FazioR. H. (2010). Person categorization and automatic racial stereotyping effects on weapon identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1073-1085.
27.
KangS. K.BodenhausenG. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547-574.
28.
KangS. K.ChasteenA. L. (2009). Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1281-1285.
29.
KawakamiK.AmodioD. M.HugenbergK. (2017). Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 1-80.
30.
KieferM. (2001). Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition, 29, 100-116.
31.
KubotaJ. T.ItoT. A. (2014). The role of expression and race in weapons identification. Emotion, 14, 1115-1124.
32.
LandrineH. (1985). Race × class stereotypes of women. Sex Roles, 13, 65-75.
33.
LedgerwoodA. (in press). Maximizing what we learn from our research: New developments in methods and statistics. In BaumeisterR.FinkelE. (Eds.), Advanced Social Psychology. Oxford University Press.
34.
LoBueV.ThrasherC. (2015). The Child Affective Facial Expression (CAFE) set: Validity and reliability from untrained adults. Frontiers in Emotion Science, 5, 1532.
35.
LundbergG.NeelR.LassetterB.ToddA. R. (2018). Racial bias in implicit danger associations generalizes to older male targets. PLoS ONE, 13, e0197398.
36.
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122-1135.
37.
MonteithM. J.SpicerC. V. (2000). Contents and correlates of Whites’ and Blacks’ racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 125-154.
38.
NavarreteC. D.OlssonA.HoA. K.MendesW. B.ThomsenL.SidaniusJ. (2009). Fear extinction to an out-group face: The role of target gender. Psychological Science, 20, 155-158.
39.
NeelR.BeckerD. V.NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T. (2012). Who expressed what emotion? Men grab anger, women grab happiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 583-586.
40.
NeubergS. L.SngO. (2013). A life history theory of social perception: Stereotyping at the intersections of age, sex, and ecology (and race). Social Cognition, 31, 696-711.
41.
NosekB. A.SmythF. L.HansenJ. J.DevosT.LindnerN. M.RanganathK. A.. . . BanajiM. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36-88.
42.
OlsonM. A.CrawfordM. T.DevlinW. (2009). Evidence for the underestimation of implicit in-group favoritism among low-status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1111-1116.
43.
PayneB. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192.
44.
PayneB. K. (2005). Conceptualizing control in social cognition: How executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 488-503.
45.
PayneB. K.LambertA. J.JacobyL. L. (2002). Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 384-396.
46.
PlantE. A.GoplenJ.KuntsmanJ. W. (2011). Selective responses to threat: The roles of race and gender in decisions to shoot. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1274-1281.
47.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377-391.
48.
RattanA.LevineC. S.DweckC. S.EberhardtJ. L. (2012). Race and the fragility of the legal distinction between juveniles and adults. PLoS ONE, 7, e36680.
49.
RiversA. M. (2017). The weapons identification task: Recommendations for adequately powered research. PLoS ONE, 12, e0177857.
50.
SchugJ.AltN. P.KlauerK. C. (2015). Gendered race prototypes: Evidence for the non-prototypicality of Asian men and Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 121-125.
51.
SchugJ.AltN. P.LuP. S.GosinM.FayJ. L. (2017). Gendered race in mass media: Invisibility of Asian men and Black women in popular magazines. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 6, 222-236.
52.
SeskoA. K.BiernatM. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356-360.
53.
ShermanG. D.HaidtJ. (2011). Cuteness and disgust: The humanizing and dehumanizing effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 3, 245-251.
54.
SmallD. A.PopeD. G.NortonM. I. (2012). An age penalty in racial preferences. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 730-737.
55.
SmithsonM. (2001). Correct confidence intervals for various regression effect sizes and parameters: The importance of noncentral distributions in computing intervals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 605-632.
56.
SmolkowskiK.GirvanE. J.McIntoshK.NeseR. N. T.HornerR. H. (2016). Vulnerable decision points for disproportionate office discipline referrals: Comparisons of discipline for African American and White elementary students. Behavioral Disorders, 41, 178-195.
57.
ThomasE. L.DovidioJ. F.WestT. V. (2014). Lost in the categorical shuffle: Evidence for the social non-prototypicality of Black women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20, 370-376.
58.
ToddA. R.SimpsonA. J.ThiemK. C.NeelR. (2016). The generalization of implicit racial bias to young Black boys: Automatic stereotyping or automatic prejudice?Social Cognition, 34, 307-324.
59.
ToddA. R.ThiemK. C.NeelR. (2016). Does seeing faces of young Black boys facilitate the identification of threatening stimuli?Psychological Science, 27, 384-393.
60.
WeitzR.GordonL. (1993). Images of Black women among Anglo college students. Sex Roles, 28, 19-34.
61.
WenturaD.DegnerJ. (2010). A practical guide to sequential priming and related tasks. In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 95-116). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
