Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of these studies was to examine the principles people engage in when thinking about punishment, using a new measure (the Punishment Orientation Questionnaire [POQ]). Although traditional conceptualizations of punishment divide it into utilitarianism (e.g., deterrence) and retributivism (“eye for an eye”), we argue that a more useful metric of lay attitudes concerns orientation toward or away from punishment. After pilot testing and factor analysis, we used item response theory to assess four scales: prohibitive utilitarianism (limiting punishment based on utility), prohibitive retributivism (aversion to punishing innocent people), permissive utilitarianism (willingness to give strict punishment based on the benefits thereof), and permissive retributivism (desire for just deserts). The POQ showed good predictive validity for capital jury eligibility and sentencing recommendation in response to a death penalty trial stimulus. This study provides a better understanding of how classic punishment philosophies manifest among laypersons and contributes data outside of classical test theory.

Keywords

retribution utilitarian punishment orientation item response theory juror decision making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achtenberg

(2015). Understanding restorative justice practice within the aboriginal context. Correctional Service Canada. Retrieved from http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/research/forum/e121/e121j-eng.shtml

Barrett

(2007). Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824.

Bartels

Pizarro

(2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121, 154-161.

Bates

J. A.

Lanza

B. A.

(2013). Conducting psychology student research via Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing service. North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 385-394.

Bentham

(2006). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In Cahn

Markie

(Eds.), Ethics: History, theory, and contemporary issues (3rd ed., pp. 309-316). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1789)

Bornstein

B. H.

Greene

(2017). The jury under fire: Myth, controversy, and reform. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190201340.001.0001

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Cacioppo

Petty

Kao

C. F.

(1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.

Carlsmith

K. M.

Darley

J. M.

Robinson

P. H.

(2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284-299.

10.

Cokely

E. T.

Galesic

Schulz

Ghazal

Garcia-Retamero

(2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 25-47.

11.

Commonwealth v. Daniels , 644 A.2d 1175 (Pa. 1994).

12.

Comrey

A. L.

(1989). Factor analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754-761.

13.

DeVellis

(2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

14.

Embretson

S. E.

Reise

S. P.

(2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Foot

(1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5-15.

16.

Gailliot

M. T.

Schmeichel

B. J.

Baumeister

R. F.

(2006). Self-regulatory processes defend against the threat of death: Effects of self-control depletion and trait self-control on thoughts and fears of dying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 49-62. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.49

17.

Gardner

R. M.

Brown

D. L.

Boice

(2012). Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk website to measure accuracy of body size estimation and body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 9, 532-534. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.06.006

18.

Garson

D. G.

(2013). Factor analysis. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishing.

19.

Greene

J. D.

(2009). Dual process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, and Mackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 581-854.

20.

Greene

J. D.

Morelli

S. A.

Lowenberg

Nystrom

L. E.

Cohen

J. D.

(2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144-1154. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004

21.

Greene

J. D.

Sommerville

R. B.

Nystrom

L. E.

Darley

J. M.

Cohen

J. D.

(2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.

22.

Horton

J. J.

Rand

D. G.

Zeckhauser

R. J.

(2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399-425. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9273-9

23.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.

24.

Kant

(2006). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In Cahn

Markie

(Eds.), Ethics: History, theory, and contemporary issues (3rd ed., pp. 270-308). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1785)

25.

Kenny

D. A.

Kaniskan

McCoach

D. B.

(2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44, 486-507. doi:10.1177/0049124114543236

26.

Markland

(2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 851-858.

27.

Mason

Suri

(2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1-23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6

28.

Mill

J. S.

(2008). On liberty ( Kahan

A. S.

, Ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford. (Original work published 1859)

29.

Miller

M. K.

Bornstein

B. H.

(2006). The use of religion in death penalty sentencing trials. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 675-684. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9056-6

30.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

31.

O’Neil

K. M.

Patry

M. W.

Penrod

S. D.

(2004). Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10(4), 443-470. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.10.4.443

32.

Paolacci

Chandler

Ipierotis

(2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.

33.

Schedler

(1980). Can retributivists support legal punishment? The Monist, 63, 185-198.

34.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

35.

Thomson

J. J.

(1986). Rights, restitution, and risk: Essays, in moral theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

36.

Trémolière

De Neys

Bonnefon

(2012). Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian. Cognition, 124, 379-384. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.011

37.

Valdesolo

DeSteno

(2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476-477.

38.

Vidmar

Miller

(1980). Socialpsychological processes underlying attitudes toward legal punishment. Law & Society Review, 14, 565-602.

39.

Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (1985).

40.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

Tellegen

(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.

41.

Webster

J. D.

(2011). A new measure of time perspective: Initial psychometric findings for the balanced time perspective scale (BTPS). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43, 111-118.

42.

Weiner

(1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.

43.

Weiner

(2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

44.

Weiner

Graham

Reyna

(1997). An attributional examination of retributive versus utilitarian philosophies of punishment. Social Justice Research, 10, 431-452.

45.

Zimbardo

P. G.

Boyd

J. N.

(1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB

Creating the Punishment Orientation Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material