According to the process model of ego depletion, exercising self-control causes shifts in motivation and attention that may increase positive emotional reactivity. In an initial study and a preregistered replication, participants exercised self-control (or not) on a writing task before reporting their emotional responses to positive, negative, and neutral images. In Study 1 (N = 256), we found that exercising (vs. not exercising) self-control increased positive emotional responses to positive images among more extroverted individuals. In Study 2 (N = 301), we found that exercising self-control increased positive reactivity independent of extroversion. These findings support the process model of ego depletion and suggest that exercising self-control may influence responding that does not entail self-control (i.e., positive emotional reactivity)—an outcome that is not anticipated by the limited resource model of self-control.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
AndersonC.GalinskyA. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2016a). Misguided effort with elusive implications. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 574-575.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2016b). Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 67-127.
5.
BerkowitzL.JaffeeS.JoE.TroccoliB. T. (2000). On the correction of feeling induced judgmental biases. In ForgasJ. (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 131-152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BradleyM. M.CodispotiM.SabatinelliD.LangP. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 300-319.
7.
BradleyM. M.LangP. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.
8.
CariaA.SitaramR.VeitR.BegliominiC.BirbaumerN. (2010). Volitional control of anterior insula activity modulates the response to aversive stimuli. A real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biological Psychiatry, 68, 425-432.
9.
CarterE. C.KoflerL. M.ForsterD. E.McCulloughM. E. (2015). A series of meta-analytic tests of the depletion effect: Self-control does not seem to rely on a limited resource. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 796-815.
10.
CarverC. S.Harmon-JonesE. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183-204.
11.
CoanJ.AllenJ. (2003). Frontal EEG asymmetry and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems. Psychophysiology, 40, 106-114.
12.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
13.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678.
14.
CowenA. S.KeltnerD. (2017). Self-report captures 27 distinct categories of emotion bridged by continuous gradients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, E7900-E7909. doi:10.1073/pnas.1702247114
15.
CrowellA.KelleyN. J.SchmeichelB. J. (2014). Trait approach motivation moderates the aftereffects of self-control. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1112. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01112
16.
CunninghamM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2016). How to make nothing out of something: Analyses of the impact of study sampling and statistical interpretation in misleading meta-analytic conclusions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1639. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01639
17.
DangJ. (2018). An updated meta-analysis of the ego depletion effect. Psychological Research, 82, 645-651.
18.
DangJ.LiuY.LiuX.MaoL. (2017). The ego could be depleted, providing initial exertion is depleting: A preregistered experiment of the ego depletion effect. Social Psychology, 48, 242-245.
19.
DeWallN.BaumeisterR.StillmanT.GailliotM. (2007). Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 62-76.
20.
EdwardsL. J.MullerK. E.WolfingerR. D.QaqishB. F.SchabenbergerO. (2008). An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the linear mixed model. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 6137-6157.
21.
FontaineJ. R. J.SchererK. R.RoeschE. B.EllsworthP. C. (2007). The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18, 1050-1057.
22.
FörsterJ.FriedmanR. S.ÖzelselA.DenzlerM. (2006). Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 133-146.
23.
FrieseM.LoschelderD. D.GieselerK.FrankenbachJ.InzlichtM. (2018). Is ego depletion real? An analysis of arguments. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088868318762183
24.
GarrisonK. G.FinleyA. J.SchmeichelB. J. (2018). Ego depletion reduces attention control: Evidence from two high-powered preregistered experiments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0146167218796473
25.
GoldbergL. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
26.
GrayJ. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246-276). New York, NY: Springer.
27.
GröpelP.BaumeisterR. F.BeckmannJ. (2014). Action versus state orientation and self-control performance after depletion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 476-487.
28.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.
29.
GrossJ. J.SuttonS. K.KetelaarT. (1998). Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 279-288.
30.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L.AlbertsH.AnggonoC. O.BataillerC.BirtA. R.. . . ZwienenbergM. (2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 546-573.
31.
HaggerM. S.WoodC.StiffC.ChatzisarantisN. L. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495-525.
32.
Harmon-JonesE. (2003). Anger and the behavioral approach system. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 995-1005.
33.
Harmon-JonesE.GableP. (2018). On the role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in approach and withdrawal motivation: An updated review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 55, e12879.
34.
HauserD. J.EllsworthP. C.GonzalezR. (2018). Are manipulation checks necessary?Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 998. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998
35.
InzlichtM.GervaisW.BerkmanE. (2015). Bias-correction techniques alone cannot determine whether ego depletion is different from zero: Commentary on Carter, Kofler, Forster, & McCullough, 2015. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2659409
36.
InzlichtM.SchmeichelB. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450-463.
37.
InzlichtM.SchmeichelB. J.MacraeC. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127-133.
38.
JobV.BerneckerK.MikettaS.FrieseM. (2015). Implicit theories about willpower predict the activation of a rest goal following self-control exertion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 694-706.
39.
JobV.DweckC. S.WaltonG. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686-1693.
40.
KassamK. S.MendesW. B. (2013). The effects of measuring emotion: Physiological reactions to emotional situations depend on whether someone is asking. PLoS ONE, 8, e64959.
41.
KelleyN.HortensiusR.SchutterD.Harmon-JonesE. (2017). The relationship of approach/avoidance motivation and asymmetric frontal cortical activity: A review of studies manipulating frontal asymmetry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 119, 19-30.
42.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Technical Report A-6). Gainesville: University of Florida.
43.
LarsenR. J.KetelaarT. (1989). Extraversion, neuroticism and susceptibility to positive and negative mood induction procedures. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1221-1228.
44.
LarsenR. J.KetelaarT. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132-140.
45.
LetzringT. D.AdamcikL. A. (2015). Personality traits and affective states: Relationships with and without affect induction. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 114-120.
46.
LucasR. E.BairdB. M. (2004). Extraversion and emotional reactivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 473-485.
47.
MilyavskayaM.InzlichtM.HopeN.KoestnerR. (2015). Saying “no” to temptation: Want-to motivation improves self-regulation by reducing temptation rather than by increasing self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 677-693.
48.
MuravenM.BaumeisterR. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247-259.
49.
MuravenM.TiceD. M.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 774-789.
50.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
51.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
52.
PuJ.SchmeichelB. J.DemareeH. A. (2010). Cardiac vagal control predicts spontaneous regulation of negative emotional expression and subsequent cognitive performance. Biological Psychology, 84, 531-540.
53.
RustingC.LarsenR. J. (1997). Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 607-712.
54.
SchmeichelB. J. (2007). Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 241-255.
55.
SchmeichelB. J.CrowellA.Harmon-JonesE. (2016). Exercising self-control increases relative left frontal cortical activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 282-288.
56.
SimonsohnU. (2017, April12). PET-PEESE is not like homeopathy [Web log comment]. Retrieved from http://datacolada.org/59
57.
SmillieL. D.CooperA. J.WiltJ.RevelleW. (2012). Do extraverts get more bang for the buck? Refining the affective-reactivity hypothesis of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 306-326.
58.
SmillieL. D.DeYoungC. G.HallP. J. (2015). Clarifying the relation between extraversion and positive affect. Journal of Personality, 83, 564-574.
59.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and applied multilevel analysis. London, England: SAGE.
60.
SprengN. R.McKinnonM. C.MarR. A.LevineB. (2009). The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 62-71.
61.
StuckeT.BaumeisterR. (2006). Ego depletion and aggressive behavior: Is the inhibition of aggression a limited resource?European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 1-13.
62.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324.
63.
TellegenA.WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1999). On the dimensional and hierarchical structure of affect. Psychological Science, 10, 297-303.
64.
ThiruchselvamR.BlechertJ.SheppesG.RydstromA.GrossJ. J. (2011). The temporal dynamics of emotion regulation: An EEG study of distraction and reappraisal. Biological Psychology, 87, 84-92.
65.
ThomasD. L.DienerE. (1990). Memory accuracy in the recall of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 291-297.
66.
TiceD. M.BaumeisterR. F.ShmueliD.MuravenM. (2007). Restoring the self: Positive affect helps improve self-regulation following ego depletion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 379-384.
67.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
68.
VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F.SchmeichelB. J. (2012). Motivation, personal beliefs, and limited resources all contribute to self-control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 943-947.
69.
VohsK. D.HeathertonT. F. (2000). Self-regulatory failure: A resource-depletion approach. Psychological Science, 11, 249-254.
70.
WestS.AikenL.KrullJ. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1-48.
71.
YuanK. H.BentlerP. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165-200.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
