The theory of planned behavior proposes that behavior is predicted by behavioral intention which is, in turn, predicted by three base components: attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norms regarding the behavior, and perceived control over the behavior. Implied within this theory is that each of the three base components influence intentions, solely in that direction. However, despite being one of the most widely used theories in many areas of psychology and health sciences, few studies have tested this basic premise. Might causal influence also flow in a reverse-causal direction from intentions back to the base components? This causal sequence was tested and supported by a correlational study, a lab-based experiment, and a quasi-experimental field study. This demonstration of reverse-causal relations from intentions to the base components suggests that the theory of planned behavior should be modified to include reciprocal causal relations.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In KuhlJ.BeckmannJ. (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 1l-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 1-9. doi:10.1037/h0031930
4.
ArmitageC. J.ConnerM. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499. doi:10.1348/014466601164939
5.
ArmitageC. J.ReidJ. C.SpencerC. P. (2013). Changes in cognition and behavior: A causal analysis of single-occupancy car use in a rural community. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 9, 1-10.
6.
ArmorD. A.TaylorS. E. (2003). The effects of mindset on behavior: Self-regulation in deliberative and implemental frames of mind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 86-95. doi:10.1177/0146167202238374
7.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 24, 396-403.
8.
BentlerP. M.SpeckartG. (1981). Attitudes “cause” behaviors: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 226-238. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.226
9.
BrehmJ. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389. doi:10.1037/h0041006
10.
BrownsteinA. L.ReadS. J.SimonD. (2004). Bias at the racetrack: Effects of individual expertise and task importance on predecision reevaluation of alternatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 891-904. doi:10.1177/0146167204264083
11.
BuddR. J. (1987). Response bias and the theory of reasoned action. Social Cognition, 5, 95-107. doi:10.1521/soco.1987.5.2.95
12.
ElliottM. A.ThomsonJ. A.RobertsonK.StephensonC.WicksJ. (2013). Evidence that changes in social cognitions predict changes in self-reported driver behavior: Causal analyses of two-wave panel data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 50, 905-916. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.07.017
13.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
15.
GollwitzerP. M.SheeranP. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 69-119). Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
16.
GretebeckK. A.BlackD. R.BlueC. L.GlickmanL. T.HustonS. A.GretebeckR. J. (2007). Physical activity and function in older adults: Theory of planned behavior. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31, 203-214. doi:10.5993/AJHB.31.2.9
17.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN.BiddleS. J.OrbellS. (2001). Antecedents of children’s physical activity intentions and behaviour: Predictive validity and longitudinal effects. Psychology and Health, 16(4), 391-407.
18.
HaggerM. S.AndersonM.KyriakakiM.DarkingsS. (2007). Aspects of identity and their influence on intentional behavior: Comparing effects for three health behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 355-367. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.017
19.
JacksJ. Z.DevineP. G. (2000). Attitude importance, forewarning of message content, and resistance to persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 19-29. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2201_3
20.
KahleL. R.BeattyS. E. (1987). Cognitive consequences of legislating postpurchase behavior: Growing up with the bottle bill. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 828-843. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00342.x
21.
KahleL. R.BermanJ. J. (1979). Attitudes cause behaviors: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 315-321. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.315
22.
KennyD. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 887-903. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.82.6.887
23.
LiskaA. E. (1984). A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude–behavior model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 61-74. doi:10.2307/3033889
24.
MarshH. W.PapaioannouA.TheodorakisY. (2006). Causal ordering of physical self-concept and exercise behavior: Reciprocal effects model and the influence of physical education teachers. Health Psychology, 25, 316-328. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.316
25.
MezeiL. (1971). Perceived social pressure as an explanation of shifts in the relative influence of race and belief on prejudice across social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 69-81. doi:10.1037/h0031095
26.
MoninB.NortonM. I. (2003). Perceptions of a fluid consensus: Uniqueness bias, false consensus, false polarization, and pluralistic ignorance in a water conservation crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 559-567. doi:10.1177/0146167203029005001
27.
PettyR. E.HaugtvedtC. P.SmithS. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In KrosnickJ. A. (Ed.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
RisenJ. L.ChenM. K. (2010). How to study choice-induced attitude change: Strategies for fixing the free-choice paradigm. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1151-1164. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00323.x
29.
ShultzT. R.LéveilléE.LepperM. R. (1999). Free choice and cognitive dissonance revisited: Choosing “lesser evils” versus “greater goods.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 40-48. doi:10.1177/0146167299025001004
30.
StadlerG.OettingenG.GollwitzerP. M. (2009). Physical activity in women: Effects of a self-regulation intervention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, 29-34. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.021
31.
StadlerG.OettingenG.GollwitzerP. M. (2010). Intervention effects of information and self-regulation on eating fruits and vegetables over two years. Health Psychology, 29, 274-283. doi:10.1037/a0018644
32.
TyagiP. K.WotrubaT. R. (1993). An exploratory study of reverse causality relationships among sales force turnover variables. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 143-153. doi:10.1007/BF02894425
33.
ZuwerinkJ. R.DevineP. G. (1996). Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It’s not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.931
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
