We investigated Asian Americans’ perceptions of Asian–White biracials. Because the Asian/White boundary may be more permeable than other minority/White boundaries, we reasoned that Asian Americans are more likely than Black Americans to be skeptical of biracials, perceiving that biracials would prefer to identify as White and would be disloyal to Asians, consequently categorizing them as more outgroup. We further reasoned that Asian Americans’ concerns about and exclusion of biracials would be predicted by greater perceived discrimination against Asian Americans, which increases the incentive for biracials to pass into the higher status racial group. Studies 1 and 2 provided correlational support for these theorized relationships among Asian Americans. Study 2 showed that perceived discrimination did not increase Black Americans’ concerns about biracials’ identity preferences and loyalty. Studies 3 and 4 provided causal evidence for the roles of perceived discrimination and biracial identity preferences, respectively, in Asian Americans’ exclusion of biracials.
AbramsD.HoggM. A. (2004). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In BrewerM. B.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Perspectives on social psychology. Self and social identity (pp. 147-181). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
2.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
3.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.BourguignonD.SeronE. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315-322.
4.
ChenJ. M.CoutoM. C. P. D. P.SaccoA. M.DunhamY. (2017). To be or not to be (Black or multiracial or White) cultural variation in racial boundaries. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550617725149
5.
ChenJ. M.HamiltonD. L. (2012). Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 152-164.
6.
ChenJ. M.MoonsW. G.GaitherS. E.HamiltonD. L.ShermanJ. W. (2014). Motivation to control prejudice predicts categorization of multiracials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 590-603.
7.
ChenJ. M.NormanJ. B. (2016). Toward a comprehensive understanding of the factors underlying multiracial person perception. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 16, 417-420.
8.
ChenJ. M.RatliffK. (2015). Implicit attitude generalization from Black to Black–White biracial group members. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 544-550.
9.
ChungR. H.KimB. S.AbreuJ. M. (2004). Asian American multidimensional acculturation scale: development, factor analysis, reliability, and validity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 10, 66-80.
10.
ColbyS. L.OrtmanJ. M. (2014). Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. population: 2014 to 2060 (Current population reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
11.
CortlandC. I.CraigM. A.ShapiroJ. R.RichesonJ. A.NeelR.GoldsteinN. J. (2017). Solidarity through shared disadvantage: highlighting shared experiences of discrimination improves relations between stigmatized groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 547-567.
12.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2012). Coalition or derogation? How perceived discrimination influences intraminority intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 759-777.
13.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2016). Stigma-based solidarity: Understanding the psychological foundations of conflict and coalition among members of different stigmatized groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 21-27.
14.
CrispR. J.HewstoneM. (1999). Differential evaluation of crossed category groups: Patterns, processes, and reducing intergroup bias. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2, 307-333.
15.
CrispR. J.StoneC. H.HallN. R. (2006). Recategorization and subgroup identification: Predicting and preventing threats from common ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 230-243.
16.
DavenportL. D. (2016). The role of gender, class, and religion in biracial Americans’ racial labeling decisions. American Sociological Review, 81, 57-84.
17.
DavisF. J. (1991). Who is Black? One nation’s definition. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
18.
DeNavas-WaltC.ProctorB. D.SmithJ. C. (2011). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010 (Current population reports). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19.
DevosT. (2006). Implicit bicultural identity among Mexican American and Asian American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12, 381-402.
20.
EliezerD.MajorB.MendesW. B. (2010). The costs of caring: Gender identification increases threat following exposure to sexism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 159-165.
21.
FrancoM. G.FrancoS. A. (2016). Impact of Identity Invalidation for Black multiracial people: The importance of race of perpetrator. Journal of Black Psychology, 42, 530-548.
22.
GaitherS. E.PaukerK.SlepianM. L.SommersS. R. (2016). Social belonging motivates categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Social Cognition, 32, 97-118.
23.
GelfandM. J.NishiiL. H.RaverJ. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1225-1244.
24.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.. . . YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100-1104.
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
HalberstadtJ.ShermanS. J.ShermanJ. W. (2011). Why Barack Obama is Black: A cognitive account of hypodescent. Psychological Science, 22(1), 29-33.
27.
HoA. K.KteilyN. S.ChenJ. M. (2017). “You’re one of us”: Black Americans’ use of hypodescent and its association with egalitarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(5), 753-768.
28.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.CuddyA. J. C.BanajiM. R. (2013). Status-boundary enforcement and the categorization of Black-White biracials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 940-943.
29.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK.. . . StewartA. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1003-1028.
30.
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.LevinD. T.BanajiM. R. (2011). Evidence for hypodescent and racial hierarchy in the categorization and perception of biracial individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 492-506.
31.
HoggM. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
32.
HoggM. A.HainsS. C.MasonI. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
33.
HoggM. A.van KnippenbergD. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 1-52.
34.
JonesN. A.BullockJ. J. (2013). Understanding who reported multiple races in the U.S. decennial census: Results from census 2000 and the 2010 census. Family Relations, 62, 5-16.
35.
JordanW. D. (2014). Historical origins of the one-drop racial rule in the United States. Journal of Critical Mixed Race Studies, 1, 98-132.
36.
KahnK. B.HoA. K.SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (2009). The space between us and them: Perceptions of status differences. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 591-604.
37.
KroschA. R.BerntsenL.AmodioD. M.JostJ. T.Van BavelJ. J. (2013). On the ideology of hypodescent: Political conservatism predicts categorization of racially ambiguous faces as Black. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1196-1203.
38.
KroschA. R.AmodioD. M. (2014). Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(25), 9079-9084.
39.
KteilyN. S.CotterillS.SidaniusJ.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.BerghR. (2014). “Not one of us”: Predictors and consequences of denying ingroup characteristics to ambiguous targets. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1231-1247.
40.
LalondeR. N.SilvermanR. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 78-85.
41.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (2002). Group reactions to loyalty and disloyalty. In S. Thye & E. Lawler (Eds.), Group cohesion, trust, and solidarity (pp. 203-228). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
42.
LeyensJ.-P.YzerbytV. Y. (1992). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 549-569.
43.
LinM. H.KwanV. S.CheungA.FiskeS. T. (2005). Stereotype content model explains prejudice for an envied outgroup: Scale of anti-Asian American stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 34-47.
MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ. P. (1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
46.
MilkmanK. L.AkinolaM.ChughD. (2012). Temporal distance and discrimination: An audit study in academia. Psychological Science, 23, 710-717.
47.
MorelandR. L.LevineJ. M.CiniM. A. (1993). Group socialization: The role of commitment. In HoggM. A.AbramsD. (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 105-129). Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
48.
PeeryD.BodenhausenG. V. (2008). Black + White = Black: Hypodescent in reflexive categorization of racially ambiguous faces. Psychological Science, 19, 973-977.
PintoI. R.MarquesJ. M.LevineJ. M.AbramsD. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 107-119.
52.
RemediosJ. D.ChasteenA. L. (2013). Finally, someone who “gets” me! Multiracial people value others’ accuracy about their race. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19, 453-460.
53.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict”. In AustinW. G.WorchelS.The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. pp. 33-47.
54.
TownsendS. S.MarkusH. R.BergsiekerH. B. (2009). My choice, your categories: The denial of multiracial identities. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 185-204.
55.
YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN. (2010). Will the “real” American please stand up? The effect of implicit national prototypes on discriminatory behavior and judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1332-1345.
56.
YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN.AdelmanL.EcclestonA.ParkerM. T. (2011). To be or not to be (ethnic): Public vs. private expressions of ethnic identification differentially impact national inclusion of White and non-White groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 908-914.
57.
YzerbytV. Y.CastanoE.LeyensJ.PaladinoM. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257-295.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
