Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-5
Deception Detection and Truth Detection Are Dependent on Different Cognitive and Emotional Traits: An Investigation of Emotional Intelligence,Theory of Mind,and Attention
Despite evidence that variation exists between individuals in high-stakes truth and deception detection accuracy rates, little work has investigated what differences in individuals’ cognitive and emotional abilities contribute to this variation. Our study addressed this question by examining the role played by cognitive and affective theory of mind (ToM), emotional intelligence (EI), and various aspects of attention (alerting, orienting, executive control) in explaining variation in accuracy rates among 115 individuals (87 women; mean age = 27.04 years [SD = 11.32]) who responded to video clips of truth-tellers and liars in real-world, high-stakes contexts. Faster attentional alerting supported truth detection, and better cognitive ToM and perception of emotion (an aspect of EI) supported deception detection. This evidence indicates that truth and deception detection are distinct constructs supported by different abilities. Future research may address whether interventions targeting these cognitive and emotional traits can also contribute to improving detection skill.
AamodtM. G.CusterH. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner, 15, 6-11.
2.
BaayenR. H.DavidsonD. J.BatesD. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
3.
BakerA.ten BrinkeL.PorterS. (2013). Will get fooled again: Emotionally intelligent people are easily duped by high-stakes deceivers. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 300-313. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02054.x
4.
Bar-OnR. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18(Suppl.), 13-25.
5.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS.HillJ.RasteY.PlumbI. (2001). The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241-252. doi:10.1017/S0021963001006643
6.
BarrD. J.LevyR.ScheepersC.TilyH. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255-278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
7.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
8.
BondC. F.DePauloB. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and. Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
9.
BrüneM. (2005). “Theory of mind” in schizophrenia: A review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31, 21-42. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi002
10.
BullerD. B.BurgoonJ. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 63, 201-242.
11.
CanterD.IoannouM.YoungsD.ChunghG. (2016). Person perception aspects of judgments of truthfulness in public appeals. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23, 547-562. doi:10.1080/13218719.2015.1081315
12.
CharltonR. A.BarrickT. R.MarkusH. S.MorrisR. G. (2009). Theory of mind associations with other cognitive functions and brain imaging in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 24, 338-348. doi:10.1037/a0015225
13.
ChristS. E.van EssenD. C.WatsonJ. M.BrubakerL. E.McDermottK. B. (2009). The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1557-1566. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn189
14.
CiarrochiJ. V.ChanA. Y. C.CaputiP. (2000). A critical evaluation of the emotional intelligence construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 539-561.
15.
ClarkH. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3
Dodell-FederD.Hope LincolnS.CoulsonJ. P.HookerC. I. (2013). Using fiction to assess mental state understanding: A new task for assessing theory of mind in adults. PLoS ONE, 8, e81279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081279
18.
EackS. M.BahorikA. L.McKnightS. A. F.HogartyS. S.GreenwaldD. P. . . . Newhill MinshewN. J. (2013). Commonalities in social and non-social cognitive impairments in adults with autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 148, 24-28. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.013
19.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 32, 88-106. doi:10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575
20.
FanJ.McCandlissB. D.SommerT.RazA.PosnerM. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340-347. doi:10.1162/089892902317361886
21.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
22.
FellnerA. N.MatthewsG.FunkeG. J.EmoA. K.Pérez-GonzálezJ. C.ZeidnerM.RobertsR. D. (2007, October). The effects of emotional intelligence on visual search of emotional stimuli and emotion identification. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, 51, 845-849.
23.
FergusonF. J.AustinE. J. (2010). Associations of trait and ability emotional intelligence with performance on Theory of Mind tasks in an adult sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 414-418. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.009
24.
FrischenA.BaylissA. P.TipperS. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694-724. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
25.
GolanO.Baron-CohenS.HillJ. J.GolanY. (2006). The “reading the mind in films” task: Complex emotion recognition in adults with and without autism spectrum conditions. Social Neuroscience, 1, 111-123. doi:10.1080/17470910600980986
26.
GranhagP. A.HartwigM. (2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189-200. doi:10.1080/10683160701645181
27.
HarpsterT.AdamsS. H.JarvisJ. P. (2009). Analyzing 911 homicide calls for indicators of guilt or innocence: An exploratory analysis. Homicide Studies, 13, 69-93. doi:10.1177/10887679083228073
28.
JaegerT. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434-446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
29.
JosephD.NewmanD. A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 54-78. doi:10.1037/a0017286
30.
LevineT. R. (2010). A few transparent liars explaining 54% accuracy in deception detection experiments. Annals of the International Communication Association, 34, 41-61. doi:10.1080/23808985.2010.11679095
31.
LevineT. R.SerotaK. B.ShulmanH.ClareD. D.Sun ParkH.ShawA. S.. . . Hyon LeeJ. (2011). Sender demeanor: Individual differences in sender believability have a powerful impact on deception detection judgments. Human Communication Research, 37, 377-403. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01407.x
32.
LevineT. R.Sun ParkH.McCornackS. A. (1999). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the “Veracity Effect.”Communication Monographs, 66, 125-144. doi:10.1080/03637759909376468
33.
LissekS.PetersS.FuchsN.WitthausH.NicholasV.TegenthoffM.. . . BrüneM. (2008). Cooperation and deception recruit different subsets of the theory-of-mind network. PLoS ONE, 3, e2023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002023
34.
LyonsM.CroftA.FairhurstS.VarleyK.WilsonC. (2017). Seeing through crocodile tears? Sex-specific associations between the Dark Triad traits and lie detection accuracy. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 1-4.
35.
MannS.VrijA. (2006). Police officers’ judgement of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioural control in real-life police interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 307-319. doi:10.1080/10683160600558444
36.
MannS.VrijA.BullR. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 137-149. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137
37.
MannS.VrijA.BullR. (2006). Looking through the eyes of an accurate lie detector. The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 7, 1-16.
38.
PandeyS.ElliottW. (2010). Suppressor variables in social work research: Ways to identify in multiple regression models. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1, 28-40. doi:10.5243/jsswr.2010.2
39.
PeaceK. A.SinclairS. M. (2012). Cold-blooded lie catchers? An investigation of psychopathy, emotional processing, and deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17, 177-191.
40.
PetridesK. V.Perez-GonzalezJ. C.FurnhamA. (2007). On the criterion and incremental validity of trait emotional intelligence. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 26-55.
41.
PhillipsL. H.TunstallM.ChannonS. (2007). Exploring the role of working memory in dynamic social cue decoding using dual task methodology. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 31, 137-152. doi:10.1007/s10919-007-0026-6
42.
PremackD.WoodruffG. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515-526. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00076512
43.
QualterP.BarlowA.StylianouM. S. (2011). Investigating the relationship between trait and ability emotional intelligence and theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 437-454. doi:10.1348/026151010X502999
44.
R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from https://www.R-project.org
45.
ReinhardM.SchwarzN. (2012). The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 377-389. doi:10.1037/a0030466
46.
SaloveyP.MayerJ. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185-211.
47.
SchutteN. S.MalouffJ. M.BhullarN. (2009). The Assessing Emotions Scale. In StoughC.SaklofskeD. H.ParkerJ. D. A. (Eds.), Assessing emotional intelligence (pp. 119-134). New York, NY: Springer.
48.
SchutteN. S.MalouffJ. M.HallL. E.HaggertyD. J.CooperJ. T.GoldenC. J.DornheimL. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167-177. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4
49.
SchutteN. S.MalouffJ. M.ThorsteinssonE. B. (2013). Increasing emotional intelligence through training: Current status and future directions. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 5, 56-72.
50.
Shamay-TsooryS. G.TomerR.BergerB. D.GoldsherD.Aharaon-PeretzJ. (2005). Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 55-67.
51.
SporerS. L.SchwandtB. (2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421-446. doi:10.1002/acp.1190
52.
StreetC. N. H.BischofW. F.VadilloM. A.KingstoneA. (2016). Inferring others’ hidden thoughts: Smart guesses in a low diagnostic world. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 539-549. doi:10.1002/bdm.1904
53.
SylwesterK.LyonsM.BuchananC.NettleD.RobertsG. (2012). The role of theory of mind in assessing cooperative intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 113-117. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.005
54.
ten BrinkeL.PorterS. (2012). Cry me a river: Identifying the behavioral consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 469-477. doi:10.1037/h0093929
55.
VrijA. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
56.
VrijA.GranhagP. A.PorterS. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89-121. doi:10.1177/1529100610390861
57.
VrijA.MannS. (2001a). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 187-203.
58.
VrijA.MannS. (2001b). Who killed my relative? Police officers’ ability to detect real-life, high-stakes lies. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7, 119-132.
59.
VrijA.MannS.RobbinsE.RobinsonM. (2006). Police officers ability to detect deception in high stakes situations and in repeated lie detection tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 741-755. doi:10.1002/acp.1200
60.
WardleM. G.GlossD. S. (1982). Effects of lying and conformity on decision-making behavior. Psychological Reports, 51, 871-877.
61.
WarrenG.SchertlerE.BullP. (2009). Detecting deception from emotional and unemotional cues. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 59-69. doi:10.1007/s10919-008-0057-7
62.
WojciechowskiJ.StolarskiM.MatthewsG. (2014). Emotional intelligence and mismatching expressive and verbal messages: A contribution to detection of deception. PLoS ONE, 9, e92570. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092570
63.
WrightC.WheatcroftJ. M. (2017). Police officers’ beliefs about, and use of, cues to deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14, 307-319. doi: 10.1002/jip.1478
64.
Wright WhelanC.WagstaffG. F.WheatcroftJ. M. (2014). High stakes lies: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception in public appeals for help with missing or murdered relatives. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21, 523-537. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2013.839931
65.
Wright WhelanC.WagstaffG. F.WheatcroftJ. M. (2015a). High stakes lies: Police and non-police accuracy in detecting deception. Psychology, Crime and Law, 21, 127-138. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.935777
66.
Wright WhelanC.WagstaffG. F.WheatcroftJ. M. (2015b). Subjective cues to deception/honesty in a high stakes situation: An exploratory approach. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 149, 517-534. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2014.911140
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
