Comparing economically unfavorably with similar others has detrimental consequences for an individual, ultimately resulting in low physical health, delinquency, and hostility. In four studies (N = 2,032), we examined whether believing in a mobile society—one offering fair chances and opportunity—mitigates hostile emotions resulting from disadvantaged social standing. We find that with increasing mobility belief, negative comparisons have gradually less impact on hostility. Specifically, measured (Studies 1 and 4) and manipulated (Studies 2 and 3) social mobility belief moderated the link between induced high versus low social status, experiencing relative deprivation, and hostile affect. A positive outcome on the surface, social mobility belief may indirectly contribute to the maintenance of social inequality by appeasing anger about perceived injustice.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586-592.
2.
AlesinaA.Di TellaR.MacCullochR. (2004). Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different?Journal of Public Economics, 88, 2009-2042.
3.
AndersonC. A.DeuserW. E.DeNeveK. M. (1995). Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 434-448.
4.
BègueL.MullerD. (2006). Belief in a just world as moderator of hostile attributional bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 117-126.
5.
BjørnskovC.DreherA.FischerJ. A.SchnellenbachJ.GehringK. (2013). Inequality and happiness: When perceived social mobility and economic reality do not match. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 91, 75-92.
6.
BrandtM. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 765-785.
7.
Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LundbergK. B.KayA. C.PayneB. K. (2015). Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science, 26, 15-26.
8.
BrunoriP. (2017). The perception of inequality of opportunity in Europe. Review of Income and Wealth, 63, 464-491. doi:10.1111/roiw.12259
9.
CallanM. J.EllardJ. H.SheadN.HodginsD. C. (2008). Gambling as a search for justice: Examining the role of personal relative deprivation in gambling urges and gambling behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1514-1529.
10.
CallanM. J.KimH.GheorghiuA. I.MatthewsW. J. (2017). The interrelations between social class, personal relative deprivation, and prosociality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 660-669.
11.
CallanM. J.KimH.MatthewsW. J. (2015). Predicting self-rated mental and physical health: The contributions of subjective socioeconomic status and personal relative deprivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1415.
12.
CallanM. J.SheadN. W.OlsonJ. M. (2011). Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 955-973.
13.
CheungF.LucasR. E. (2016). Income inequality is associated with stronger social comparison effects: The effect of relative income on life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 332-341.
14.
DalbertC. (2002). Belief in a just world as a buffer against anger. Social Justice Research, 15, 123-145.
15.
DavidaiS.GilovichT. (2015). Building a more mobile America—One income quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 60-71.
16.
DayM. V.FiskeS. T. (2017). Movin’on up? How perceptions of social mobility affect our willingness to defend the system. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 267-274.
17.
DestinM. (2017). An open path to the future: Perceived financial resources and school motivation. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 1004-1031.
18.
DestinM.OysermanD. (2009). From assets to school outcomes: How finances shape children’s perceived possibilities and intentions. Psychological Science, 20, 414-418.
19.
DohrenwendB. S. (1973). Social status and stressful life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 225-235.
20.
EllardJ. H. (2007). The Financial Conscientiousness Scale (Unpublished questionnaire). Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
21.
EuteneuerF. (2014). Subjective social status and health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 27, 337-343.
22.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
23.
GibbonsF. X.BuunkB. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142.
24.
GoodmanE.AdlerN. E.DanielsS. R.MorrisonJ. A.SlapG. B.DolanL. M. (2003). Impact of objective and subjective social status on obesity in a biracial cohort of adolescents. Obesity, 11, 1018-1026.
25.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
26.
GrantP. R. (2008). The protest intentions of skilled immigrants with credentialing problems: A test of a model integrating relative deprivation theory with social identity theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 687-705.
27.
GreitemeyerT.SagioglouC. (2016). Subjective socioeconomic status causes aggression: A test of the theory of social deprivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 178-194.
28.
GreitemeyerT.SagioglouC. (2017). Increasing wealth inequality may increase interpersonal hostility: The relationship between personal relative deprivation and aggression. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157, 766-776.
29.
GreitemeyerT.SagioglouC. (2018). Does low (vs. high) subjective socioeconomic status increase both prosociality and aggression?Social Psychology, 49, 76-87.
30.
GuimondS.Dube-SimardL. (1983). Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 526-535.
31.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
HoE. A.SanbonmatsuD. M.AkimotoS. A. (2002). The effects of comparative status on social stereotypes: How the perceived success of some persons affects the stereotypes of others. Social Cognition, 20, 36-57.
33.
HochschildJ. (1996). Facing up to the American dream: Race, class and the soul of the nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
KrausM. W. (2015). Americans still overestimate social class mobility: A pre-registered self-replication. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1709.
35.
KrausM. W.AndersonC.CallaghanB. (2015). The inequality of politics: Social class rank and political participation (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2600107). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2600107
36.
KrausM. W.CallaghanB. (2014). Noblesse oblige? Social status and economic inequality maintenance among politicians. PLoS ONE, 9, e85293. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085293
37.
KrausM. W.CôtéS.KeltnerD. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 1716-1723.
38.
KrausM. W.RuckerJ. M.RichesonJ. A. (2017). Americans misperceive racial economic equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 10324-10331.
39.
KrausM. W.TanJ. J. (2015). Americans overestimate social class mobility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 58, 101-111.
40.
KrausM. W.TanJ. J.TannenbaumM. B. (2013). The social ladder: A rank-based perspective on social class. Psychological Inquiry, 24, 81-96.
41.
MandisodzaA. N.JostJ. T.UnzuetaM. M. (2006). “Tall poppies” and “American dreams”: Reactions to rich and poor in Australia and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 659-668.
42.
MishraS.CarletonR. N. (2015). Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 144-149.
OishiS.KesebirS.DienerE. (2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095-1100.
45.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisfying to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
46.
OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 991-1004.
47.
PinquartM.SörensenS. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187-224.
48.
RichesonJ. A.SommersS. R. (2016). Toward a social psychology of race and race relations for the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 439-463.
49.
SapolskyR. M. (2005). The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science, 308, 648-652.
50.
ShariffA. F.WiwadD.AkninL. B. (2016). Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: Cross-national and experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 373-380.
51.
Singh-ManouxA.AdlerN. E.MarmotM. G. (2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1321-1333.
52.
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.PippinG. M.BialosiewiczS. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 203-232.
53.
StarmansC.SheskinM.BloomP. (2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behavior, 1, Article 0082.
54.
StilesB. L.LiuX.KaplanH. B. (2000). Relative deprivation and deviant adaptations: The mediating effects of negative self-feelings. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 37, 64-90.
55.
TaylorD. M.MoghaddamF. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Praeger.
56.
TaylorS. E.WaymentH. A.CarrilloM. (1996). Social comparison, self-regulation, and motivation. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 3-27). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
57.
TylerT. R.McGrawK. M. (1986). Ideology and the interpretation of personal experience: Procedural justice and political quiescence. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 115-128.
58.
ValentinoN. A.BraderT.GroenendykE. W.GregorowiczK.HutchingsV. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73, 156-170.
59.
von SoestT.WagnerJ.HansenT.GerstorfD. (2018). Self-esteem across the second half of life: The role of socioeconomic status, physical health, social relationships, and personality factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 945-958. doi:10.1037/pspp0000123
60.
WakslakC. J.JostJ. T.TylerT. R.ChenE. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267-274.
61.
World Bank. (2016). Poverty and shared prosperity 2016: Taking on inequality. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0958-3
ZoogahD. B. (2010). Why should I be left behind? Employees’ perceived relative deprivation and participation in development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 159-179.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
