Studies on evaluative conditioning show that a change in liking can occur whenever stimuli are paired. Such instances of attitude change are known to depend on the type of relation established between stimuli (e.g., “Bob is a friend of Mike” vs. “Bob is an enemy of Mike”). Research has so far only compared assimilative and contrastive relational qualifiers (e.g., friend vs. enemy). For the first time, we compared the effect of nonoppositional qualifiers on attitude change in an evaluative conditioning procedure (e.g., “Bob causes Positive Outcomes” vs. “Bob predicts Positive Outcomes”). Differential effects of nonoppositional relational qualifiers were observed on explicit and implicit evaluations. We discuss the implications of our findings for attitude research, theories of attitude change, and optimizing evaluative conditioning for changing attitudes in applied settings.
AntoniewiczF.BrandR. (2016). Learning to like exercising: Evaluative conditioning changes automatic evaluations of exercising and influences subsequent exercising behavior. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38, 138-148.
2.
BodenhausenG. V.BrannonS. M.GawronskiB. (2016). The associative-propositional duality in the representation, formation, and expression of attitudes. In R. Deutsch, B. Gawronski, & W. Hofmann (Eds.), Reflective and impulsive determinants of human behavior (pp. 115-130). Routledge.
3.
BohnerG.ErbH.-P.SieblerF. (2008). Information processing approaches to persuasion: Integrating assumptions from the dual-and single-processing perspectives. In CranoW. D.PrislinR. (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 161-188). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
BrownR. D.BassiliJ. N. (2002). Spontaneous trait associations and the case of the superstitious banana. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 87-92.
5.
CarlstonD. E.SkowronskiJ. J. (2005). Linking versus thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 884-898.
6.
CartwrightD.HararyF. (1956). Structural balance: a generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review, 63, 277-293.
7.
CrandallC. S.SilviaP. J.N’GbalaA.TsangJ.DawsonK. (2007). Balance theory, unit relations, and attribution: The underlying integrity of Heiderian theory. Review of General Psychology, 11, 12-30.
8.
CastelliL.De DeaC.NesdaleD. (2008). Learning social attitudes: Children’s sensitivity to the nonverbal behaviors of adult models during interracial interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1504-1513.
9.
ChaikenS.EaglyA. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and. Unintended Thought, 212, 212-252.
10.
De HouwerJ. (2009). The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models. Learning & Behavior, 37, 1-20.
11.
De HouwerJ. (2014). A propositional model of implicit evaluation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 342-353.
12.
De HouwerJ.HughesS. (2016). Evaluative conditioning as a symbolic phenomenon: On the relation between evaluative conditioning, evaluative conditioning via instructions, and persuasion. Social Cognition, 34, 480-494.
13.
EllisE. M.HomishG. G.ParksK. A.CollinsR. L.KiviniemiM. T. (2015). Increasing condom use by changing people’s feelings about them: An experimental study. Health Psychology, 34, 941-950.
14.
FeatherN. T. (1971). Organization and discrepancy in cognitive structures. Psychological Review, 78, 355-379.
15.
FiedlerK.UnkelbachC. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 639-656.
16.
FördererS.UnkelbachC. (2012). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS–US relations. Cognition & Emotion, 26, 534-540.
17.
GawronskiB.BalasR.HuX. (2016). What do I know about it versus how do I feel about it? A theoretical analysis of response processes in evaluative conditioning. Social Cognition, 34, 357-381.
18.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2011). The associative propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 59-127). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
19.
GawronskiB.DeutschR.MbirkouS.SeibtB.StrackF. (2008). When “just say no” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 370-377.
20.
GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
GawronskiB.WaltherE. (2008). The TAR effect: When the ones who dislike become the ones who are disliked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1276-1289.
22.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
23.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
24.
HavermansR. C.JansenA. (2007). Increasing children’s liking of vegetables through flavour–flavour learning. Appetite, 48, 259-262.
25.
HeiderF. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 6, 358-374.
26.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
27.
HeiderF. (1988). Fritz Heider: The “notebooks,” Vol. 4: Balance theory (Benesh-WeinerM., Ed.). Munchen, Germany: Psycologie Verlags Union.
28.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29.
29.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390-421.
30.
HuX.GawronskiB.BalasR. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 17-32.
31.
HütterM.KutznerF.FiedlerK. (2014). What is learned from repeated pairings? On the scope and generalizability of evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 631-643
32.
HütterM.De HouwerJ. (2017). Examining the contributions of memory-dependent and memory-independent components to evaluative conditioning via instructions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 49-58.
33.
HütterM.SweldensS.StahlC.UnkelbachC.KlauerK. C. (2012). Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 539-557.
34.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 83-109.
35.
LaiC. K.MariniM.LehrS. A.CerrutiC.ShinJ.-E. L.Joy-GabaJ. A.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765-1785.
36.
MinearM.ParkD. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630-633.
37.
MitchellC. J.De HouwerJ.LovibondP. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183-198.
38.
MoranT.Bar-AnanY. (2013). The effect of object–valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition & Emotion, 27, 743-752.
39.
MoranT.Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A. (2016). The assimilative effect of co-occurrence on evaluation above and beyond the effect of relational qualifiers. Social Cognition, 34, 435-461.
40.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413-417.
41.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421-433.
42.
OrghianD.Garcia-MarquesL.UlemanJ. S.HeinkeD. (2015). A connectionist model of spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference: Do they have the same underlying processes?Social Cognition, 33, 20-66.
43.
PayneB. K.ChengC. M.GovorunO.StewartB. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.
44.
PetersK. R.GawronskiB. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 557-569.
45.
PettyR. E.BrinolP. (2014). The elaboration likelihood and metacognitive models of attitudes. In GawronskiB.ShermanJ. W. (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 172-187). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). Message elaboration versus peripheral cues. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 141-172). New York, NY: Springer.
47.
PryorJ. B.ReederG. D.MonroeA. E. (2012). The infection of bad company: Stigma by association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 224-241.
48.
ReadS. J.VanmanE. J.MillerL. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and Gestalt principles: (Re) introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26-53.
49.
SweldensS.Van OsselaerS. M.JaniszewskiC. (2010). Evaluative conditioning procedures and the resilience of conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 473-489.
50.
TormalaZ. L.BriñolP. (2015). Attitude change and persuasion: Past, present and future directions. In NortonM. I.RuckerD. D.LambertonC. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 29-64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
WaltherE. (2002). Guilty by mere association: evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 919-934.
53.
WaltherE.GawronskiB.BlankH.LangerT. (2009). Changing likes and dislikes through the back door: The US-revaluation effect. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 889-917.
54.
WaltherE.NagengastB.TrasselliC. (2005). Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 175-196.
55.
WaltherE.WeilR.DüsingJ. (2011). The role of evaluative conditioning in attitude formation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 192-196.
56.
WegnerD. M.WenzlaffR.KerkerR. M.BeattieA. E. (1981). Incrimination through innuendo: Can media questions become public answers?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 822-832.
57.
WeinerB. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer.
58.
WeinerB. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
59.
ZanonR.De HouwerJ.GastA.SmithC. T. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2105-2122.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
