A vast amount of literature examined the relationship between retrospective affective evaluations and evaluations of affective experiences. This literature has focused on simple momentary experiences, and was based on a unidimensional concept of affect. The current article examines the relationships between evaluations of complex experiences, experiences involving both positive and negative feelings, and the retrospective evaluation of these experiences. Based on the idea that negative information is better remembered than positive information, we predict that in comparison with negative retrospective evaluations, positive evaluations have a stronger correlation with end affect and a weaker correlation with peak affect. These predictions are tested in two studies. We explore boundary conditions for these effects and demonstrate the implications of the asymmetry between positive and negative affect to various topics that are at the center of affect research: the dimensionality of affective experiences, the memory-experience gap, and the analysis of net affect.
ArielyD.LoewensteinG. (2000). When does duration matter in judgment and decision making?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 508-523.
2.
BartholowB.FabianiM.GrattonG.BettencourtA. (2001). A psychophysiological examination of cognitive processing of and affective responses to social expectancy violations. Psychological Science, 12, 197-204.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370.
4.
BlessH.MackieD. M.SchwarzN. (1992). Mood effects on attitude judgments: Independent effects of mood before and after message elaboration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 585-595.
5.
ClaeysW.TimmersL. (1993). Some instantiations of the informational negativity effect: Positive-negative asymmetry in category breadth and in estimated meaning similarity of trait adjectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 111-129.
6.
CojuharencoI.RyvkinD. (2008). Peak–end rule versus average utility: How utility aggregation affects evaluations of experiences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 326-335.
7.
DoA. M.RupertA. V.WolfordG. (2008). Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: The peak-end rule. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 96-98.
8.
FiskeS. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 22, 889-906.
9.
GanzachY. (1996). Preference reversal in equal probability gambles: A case for anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 95-110.
10.
GanzachY. (2000). Judging risk and return of financial assets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 353-370.
11.
GanzachY.SchulY. (1995). The influence of quantity of information and goal framing on decision. Acta Psychologica, 89, 23-36.
12.
GrazianoW. G.BrothenT.BerscheidE. (1980). Attention, attraction, and individual differences in reaction to criticism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 193-202.
13.
HajcakG.OlvetD. M. (2008). The persistence of attention to emotion: Brain potentials during and after picture presentation. Emotion, 8, 250-255.
14.
HertensteinM. J.CamposJ. J. (2004). The retention effects of an adult’s emotional displays on infant behavior. Child Development, 75, 595-613.
15.
HofmannD. A.GavinM. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623-641.
16.
HseeC. K.HastieR. (2006). Decision and experience: why don’t we choose what makes us happy?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 31-37.
17.
ItoT. A.CacioppoJ. T. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 660-676.
18.
KahnemanD. (2000). Evaluation by moments: Past and future. In KahnemanD.TverskyA. (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 693-708). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KahnemanD. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
20.
KahnemanD.DeatonA. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 16489-16493.
21.
KahnemanD.FrederickS. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
KahnemanD.KruegerA. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3-24.
23.
KahnemanD.WakkerP. P.SarinR. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375-405.
24.
KempS.BurtC. D.FurneauxL. (2008). A test of the peak-end rule with extended autobiographical events. Memory & Cognition, 36, 132-138.
25.
LeDouxJ. E.RomanskiL.XagorarisA. (1989). Indelibility of subcortical emotional memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 238-243.
26.
Miron-ShatzT. (2009). Evaluating multiepisode events: Boundary conditions for the peak-end rule. Emotion, 9, 206-213.
27.
Miron-ShatzT.StoneA.KahnemanD. (2009). Memories of yesterday’s emotions: Does the valence of experience affect the memory-experience gap?Emotion, 9, 885-891.
28.
MitchellT. R.ThompsonL.PetersonE.CronkR. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 421-448.
29.
MroczekD. K.AlmeidaD. M. (2004). The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. Journal of Personality, 72, 355-378.
30.
MroczekD. K.KolarzC. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333-1349.
31.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
32.
NesseR. M. (1990). Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nature, 1, 261-289.
33.
OehmanA.LundqvistD.EstevesF. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381-396.
34.
PayneJ. W.BettmanJ. R.JohnsonE. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131.
35.
PetersM.SorbiM.KruiseD.KerssensJ.VerhaakP.BensingJ. (2000). Electronic diary assessment of pain disability and psychological adaptation in patients differing in duration of pain. Pain, 84, 181-192.
36.
PrattoF.JohnO. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391.
37.
QuirkG. J.RepaJ. C.LeDouxJ. E. (1995). Fear conditioning enhances short-latency auditory responses of lateral amygdala neurons: Parallel recordings in the freely behaving rat. Neuron, 15, 1029-1039.
38.
RedelmeierD. A.KatzJ.KahnemanD. (2003). Memories of colonoscopy: A randomized trial. Pain, 104, 187-194.
39.
RobinetteJ. W.CharlesS. T.MogleJ. A.AlmeidaD. M. (2013). Neighborhood cohesion and daily well-being: Results from a diary study. Social Science & Medicine, 96, 174-182.
40.
RobinsonM. D.CloreG. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934-960.
41.
RussellJ. A.CarrollJ. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3-30.
42.
RyffC. D.AlmeidaD. M. (2010). Midlife in the United States (MIDUS 2): Daily Stress Project, 2004-2009. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
43.
RyffC. D.et al. (2012). Midlife in the United States (MIDUS 2), 2004-2006. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
44.
SchneiderS.StoneA. A.SchwartzJ. E.BroderickJ. E. (2011). Peak and end effects in patients’ daily recall of pain and fatigue: A within-subjects analysis. The Journal of Pain, 12, 228-235.
45.
ShafirE. (1993). Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Memory & Cognition, 21, 546-556.
46.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689-699.
47.
SlovicP.FinucaneM. L.PetersE.MacGregorD. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333-1352.
48.
SmithN. K.CacioppoJ. T.LarsenJ. T.ChartrandT. L. (2003). May I have your attention, please: Electrocortical responses to positive and negative stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 41, 171-183.
49.
StoneA. A.BroderickJ.SchwartzJ.ShiffmanS.Litcher-KellyL.CalvaneseP. (2003). Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: Reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain, 104, 343-351.
50.
StoneA. A.SchwartzJ. E.BroderickJ. E.ShiffmanS. S. (2005). Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: A consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1340-1346.
51.
SuttonR. I. (1992). Feelings about a Disneyland visit: Photographs and reconstruction of bygone emotions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1, 278-287.
52.
ThomasD. L.DienerE. (1990). Memory accuracy in the recall of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 291-297.
53.
TullyS.MeyvisT. (2016). Questioning the end effect: Endings are not inherently over-weighted in retrospective evaluations of experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 630-642.
54.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
55.
VaishA.GrossmannT.WoodwardA. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 383-403.
56.
WarrP. B.BarterJ.BrownbridgeG. (1983). On the independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 644-651.
57.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.CareyG. (1988). Positive and negative affectivity and their relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 346-353.
58.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
59.
WatsonD.TellegenA. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
60.
WeberE.KirsnerB. (1997). Reasons for rank-dependent utility evaluation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 41-61.
61.
WirtzD.KrugerJ.ScollonC. N.DienerE. (2003). What to do on spring break? The role of predicted, on-line, and remembered experience in future choice. Psychological Science, 14, 520-524.
62.
YooW.MayberryR.BaeS.SinghK.HeQ. P.LillardJ. W.Jr. (2014). A study of effects of multicollinearity in the multivariable analysis. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 4(5), 9-19.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
