Research has found that implementation intentions, if–then action plans (e.g., “if I see a Black face, I will think safe”), reduce stereotyping on implicit measures. However, it is unknown by what process(es) implementation intentions reduce implicit stereotyping. The present research examines the effects of implementation intentions on stereotype activation (e.g., extent to which stereotypic information is accessible) and stereotype application (e.g., extent to which accessible stereotypes are applied in judgment). In addition, we assessed the efficiency of implementation intentions by manipulating cognitive resources (e.g., digit-span, restricted response window) while participants made judgments on an implicit stereotyping measure. Across four studies, implementation intentions reduced implicit stereotyping. This decrease in stereotyping was associated with reductions in both stereotype activation and application. In addition, these effects of implementation intentions were highly efficient and associated with reduced stereotyping even for groups for which people may have little practice inhibiting stereotypes (e.g., gender).
BanajiM. R.GreenwaldA. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (pp. 55-76). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
2.
BrandstätterV.LengfelderA.GollwitzerP. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 946-960.
3.
BrannonS. M.GawronskiB. (2017). A second chance for first impressions? Exploring the context-(in) dependent updating of implicit evaluations. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 8, 275-283.
4.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
5.
ConreyF. R.ShermanJ. W.GawronskiB.HugenbergK.GroomC. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469-487.
6.
CorrellJ.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314-1329.
7.
CressieN.PardoL.del Carmen PardoM. (2003). Size and power considerations for testing loglinear models using φ-divergence test statistics. Statistica Sinica, 13, 555-570.
8.
DasguptaN.GreenwaldA. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
9.
DevineP. G.MonteithM. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339-360). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.GaertnerS. L. (2000). Reducing contemporary prejudice: Combating explicit and implicit bias at the individual and intergroup level. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 137-163). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
11.
FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
12.
FiedlerK.BluemkeM. (2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the Implicit Association Tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 307-316.
13.
ForoniF.MayrU. (2005). The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 139-144.
14.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
GelmanS. A.CollmanP.MaccobyE. E. (1986). Inferring properties from categories versus inferring categories from properties: The case of gender. Child Development, 57, 396-404.
16.
GelmanS. A.TaylorM. G. (2000). Gender essentialism in cognitive development. In MillerP. H.Kofsky ScholnickE. (Eds.), Toward a feminist developmental psychology (pp. 169-190). Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
17.
GilbertD. T.HixonJ. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
18.
GollwitzerP. M.SheeranP. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.
19.
GovorunO.PayneB. K. (2006). Ego—Depletion and prejudice: Separating automatic and controlled components. Social Cognition, 24, 111-136.
20.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
21.
HehmanE.FlakeJ. K.CalanchiniJ. (2017). Disproportionate use of lethal force in policing is associated with regional racial biases of residents. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1948550617711229
22.
Joy-GabaJ. A.NosekB. A. (2010). The surprisingly limited malleability of implicit racial evaluations. Social Psychology, 43, 137-146.
23.
KlauerK. C.HölzenbeinF.CalanchiniJ.ShermanJ. W. (2014). How malleable is categorization by race? Evidence for competitive category use in social categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 21-40.
24.
KrieglmeyerR.ShermanJ. W. (2012). Disentangling stereotype activation and stereotype application in the stereotype misperception task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 205-224.
25.
KundaZ.SpencerS. J. (2003). When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 522-544.
26.
LaiC. K.MariniM.LehrS. A.CerrutiC.ShinJ. E.Joy-GabaJ. A.. . . NosekB. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765-1785.
27.
LaneK. A.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A.GreenwaldA. G. (2007). Understanding and using the implicit association test: IV: What we know (so far) about the method. In WittenbrinkB.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 59–102). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122-1135.
29.
MendozaS. A.GollwitzerP. M.AmodioD. M. (2010). Reducing the expression of implicit stereotypes: Reflexive control through implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 512-523.
30.
MoshagenM. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42-54.
31.
MoskowitzG. B.LiP. (2011). Egalitarian goals trigger stereotype inhibition: A proactive form of stereotype control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 103-116.
32.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11087-11092.
33.
PayneB. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192.
34.
PhillsC. E.KawakamiK.TabiE.NadolnyD.InzlichtM. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and Blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197-210.
35.
RichesonJ. A.SheltonJ. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287-290.
36.
SchumanH.SteehC.BoboL.KrysanM. (1997). Racial attitudes in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
ShermanJ. W.KlauerK. C.AllenT. J. (2010). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
StewartB. D.PayneB. K. (2008). Bringing automatic stereotyping under control: Implementation intentions as efficient means of thought control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1332-1345.
39.
SwimJ. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21-36.
40.
TaylorM. G. (1996). The development of children’s beliefs about social and biological aspects of gender differences. Child Development, 67, 1555-1571.
41.
WeaverJ. R.VandelloJ. A.BossonJ. K.BurnafordR. M. (2010). The proof is in the punch: Gender differences in perceptions of action and aggression as components of manhood. Sex Roles, 62, 241-251.
42.
WebbT. L.SheeranP.PepperJ. (2012). Gaining control over responses to implicit attitude tests: Implementation intentions engender fast responses on attitude-incongruent trials. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 13-32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
