This article analyzes the ego-defensive role played by legitimation, by examining the hypothesis that threat-based justifications attenuate the negative effect on an individual’s self-esteem caused by his or her becoming aware of his or her own discriminatory behavior. Across three studies (including a pilot experiment), participants who were led to believe that they had acted in a discriminatory way experienced a decrease in their self-esteem. In Study 1 (N = 116), this effect was nullified when discrimination was justified by either symbolic or realistic threat perceptions. Study 2 (N = 250) replicated this pattern of results and went further by showing that discrimination affects self-esteem only in more egalitarian individuals, whereas for those less egalitarian, it affects their social image. According to the ego-defensive role of legitimation, a meta-analytical integration of the results confirmed that the influence of discrimination in depressing self-esteem is moderated by threat-based justifications.
AbramsD.HoggM. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180403
2.
BahnsA. J. (2017). Threat as justification of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 52-74. doi:10.1177/1368430215591042
3.
Costa-LopesR.DovidioJ. F.PereiraC. R.JostJ. T. (2013). Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 229-237. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1966
4.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414
5.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. T. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359-378. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359
6.
CrockerJ.ParkL. E. (2004). The costly pursuit of self-esteem. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 392-414. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392
7.
DevineP. G.MonteithM. J.ZuwerinkJ. R.ElliotA. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817-830. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.817
8.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1-51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
10.
FrantzC. M.CuddyA. J. C.BurnettM.RayH.HartA. (2004). A threat in the computer: The race Implicit Association Test as a stereotype threat experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1611-1624. doi:10.1177/0146167204266650
11.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2005). Understanding and addressing contemporary racism: From aversive racism to the common ingroup identity model. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 615-639. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00424.x
13.
HeathertonT. F.PolivyJ. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895.
14.
IacovielloV.BerentJ.FredericN. S.PereiraA. (2017). The impact of ingroup favoritism on self-esteem: A normative perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 31-41. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.013
15.
JordanC. H.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P. (2005). Types of high self-esteem and prejudice: How implicit self-esteem relates to ethnic discrimination among high explicit self-esteem individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 693-702. doi:10.1177/0146167204271580
16.
JostJ. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: A paradigm for investigating the effects of socioeconomic success on stereotype content. In MoskowitzG. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89-102). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
18.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2003). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
19.
JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.). (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspective on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
KatzI.HassR. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
21.
KinderD. R.SearsD. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414-431.
22.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S. (2012). Meritocracy, self-concerns, and Whites’ denial of racial inequity. Self and Identity, 11, 202-222. doi:10.1080/15298868.2010.542015
23.
LemyreL.SmithP. M. (1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 660-670. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.660
24.
Lima-NunesA.PereiraC. R.CorreiaI. (2013). Restricting the scope of justice to justify discrimination: The role played by justice perceptions in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 627-636. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1981
25.
MajorB.KaiserC. R.O’BrienL.McCoyS. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068-1086. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1068
26.
MonteithM. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469-485.
27.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718-1729. doi:10.1177/0146167205278261
28.
PereiraC.ValaJ.Costa-LopesR. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1231-1250. doi:10.1002/ejsp.718
29.
PereiraC.ValaJ.LeyensJ. P. (2009). From infra-humanization to discrimination: The mediation of symbolic threat needs egalitarian norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 336-344. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.010
30.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832. doi:10.1177/0146167205275304
31.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
RubinM.HewstoneM. (1998). Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3
33.
RudmanL. A.DohnM. C.FairchildK. (2007). Implicit self-esteem compensation: Automatic threat defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 798-813. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.798
34.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
35.
SchwartzS. H.CieciuchJ.VecchioneM.DavidovE.FischerR.BeierleinC.. . . KontyM. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663-688. doi:10.1037/a0029393
36.
SchwarzerG. (2017). Package “meta”: General package for meta-analysis (Repository CRAN). Retrieved from https://github.com/guido-s/meta
37.
Son HingL. S.BobocelD. R.ZannaM. P.GarciaD. M.GeeS. S.OraziettiK. (2011). The merit of meritocracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 433-450. doi:10.1037/a0024618
38.
StephanW. G.BonieckiK. A.YbarraO.BettencourtA.ErvinK. S.JacksonL. A.. . . RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of blacks and whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242-1254. doi:10.1177/01461672022812009
39.
TajfelH. (1984). Intergroup relations, social myths and social justice in social psychology. In TajfelH. (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 695-715). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
41.
TylerT. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
42.
TylerT. R. (2010). Legitimacy and rule adherence: A psychological perspective on the antecedents and consequences of legitimacy. In BobocelD. R.KayA. C.ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of justice and legitimacy: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 11, pp. 251-271). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
43.
UhlmannE. L.CohenG. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16, 474-480. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01559.x
44.
ValaJ.PereiraC. R.LimaM. E. O.LeyensJ. P. (2012). Intergroup time bias and racialized social relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 491-504. doi:10.1177/0146167211429746
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
