A Sense of Obligation: Cultural Differences in the Experience of Obligation

Abstract

In this investigation of cultural differences in the experience of obligation, we distinguish between Confucian Role Ethics versus Relative Autonomy lay theories of motivation and illustrate them with data showing relevant cultural differences in both social judgments and intrapersonal experience. First, when judging others, Western European heritage culture (WEHC) participants (relative to Confucian heritage culture [CHC] participants) judged obligation-motivated actors more negatively than those motivated by agency (Study 1, N = 529). Second, in daily diary and situation sampling studies, CHC participants (relative to WEHC participants) perceived more congruency between their own agentic and obligated motivations, and more positive emotional associations with obligated motivations (Study 2, N = 200 and Study 3, N = 244). Agentic motivation, however, was universally associated with positive emotions. More research on a Role Ethics rather than Relative Autonomy conception of agency may improve our understanding of human motivation, especially across cultures.

Keywords

motivation culture obligation agency self-determination theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ames

R. T.

(2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

Ames

R. T.

Rosemont

H. J.

(2014). Family Reverence (xiao 孝）in the Analects: Confucian role ethics and the dynamics of intergenerational transmission. In Olberding

(Ed.), Dao companion to the analects (pp. 117-136). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Biesanz

J. C.

Falk

C. F.

Savalei

(2010). Assessing mediational models: Testing and interval estimation for indirect effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 661-701.

Biesanz

J. C.

Schrager

S. M.

(2018). Sample size planning with effect size estimates. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Bockover

M. I.

(2012). Confucian ritual as body language of self, society, and spirit. Sophia, 51, 177-194.

Buchtel

E. E.

(2009). [Dialectical Self-Concept Scale, 32 items, among 546 UBC undergraduates]. Unpublished raw data.

Buchtel

E. E.

(2014). Cultural sensitivity or cultural stereotyping? Positive and negative effects of a cultural psychology class. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 40-52.

Buchtel

E. E.

Guan

Peng

Sang

Chen

S. X.

Bond

M. H.

(2015). Immorality East and West: Are immoral behaviors especially harmful, or especially uncivilized? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1382-1394. doi:10.1177/0146167215595606

Chen

Vansteenkiste

Beyers

Soenens

Van Petegem

(2013). Autonomy in family decision making for Chinese adolescents: Disentangling the dual meaning of autonomy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 1184-1209. doi:10.1177/0022022113480038

10.

Cheng

R. W.

Lam

(2013). The interaction between social goals and self-construal on achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 136-148. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.01.001

11.

Chirkov

V. I.

(2014). The universality of psychological autonomy across cultures: Arguments from developmental and social psychology. In Weinstein

(Ed.), Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 27-51). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_2

12.

Chirkov

V. I.

Ryan

R. M.

Kim

Kaplan

(2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97-109.

13.

Dunlap

W. P.

Cortina

J. M.

Vaslow

J. B.

Burke

M. J.

(1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170

14.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J.

Glick

(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

15.

Gelman

(2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2865-2873. doi:10.1002/sim.3107

16.

Gore

J. S.

Cross

S. E.

(2006). Pursuing goals for us: Relationally autonomous reasons in long-term goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 848-861.

17.

Hamamura

Heine

S. J.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 932-942. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.034

18.

Huang

C.-Y.

Cheah

C. S. L.

Lamb

M. E.

Zhou

(2017). Associations between parenting styles and perceived child effortful control within Chinese families in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 795-812. doi:10.1177/0022022117706108

19.

Hui

C. M.

Fok

H. K.

Bond

M. H.

(2009). Who feels more ambivalence? Linking dialectical thinking to mixed emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 493-498. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.022

20.

Iyengar

S. S.

Lepper

M. R.

(1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349-366.

21.

Jiang

Gore

J. S.

(2016). The relationship between autonomous motivation and goal pursuit: A cross-cultural perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 101-111. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12115

22.

Kant

(1993). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. In Ellington

J. W.

(Trans.), Grounding for the metaphysics of morals & on a supposed right to lie because of philanthropic concerns (pp. 7-62), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published in 1785)

23.

Kitayama

Mesquita

Karasawa

(2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 890-903.

24.

(2003). The core of Confucian learning. American Psychologist, 58, 146-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.146

25.

Sheldon

K. M.

Liu

(2015). Dialectical thinking moderates the effect of extrinsic motivation on intrinsic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 89-95. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.019

26.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Fairchild

A. J.

Fritz

M. S.

(2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.

27.

Markus

H. R.

(2016). What moves people to action? Culture and motivation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 161-166. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.028

28.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

29.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568-579.

30.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In Murphy-Berman

Berman

J. J.

(Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (Vol. 49, pp. 1-57). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

31.

McShane

B. B.

Böckenholt

(2016). Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach. Psychological Methods, 21, 47-60. doi:10.1037/met0000036

32.

Menon

(2013). The Hindu concept of self-refinement: Implicit yet meaningful. Psychology and Developing Societies, 25, 195-222. doi:10.1177/0971333613477320

33.

Miller

J. G.

(2003). Culture and agency: Implications for psychological theories of motivation and social development. In Murphy-Berman

Berman

J. J.

(Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (Vol. 49, pp. 59-99). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

34.

Miller

J. G.

Akiyama

Kapadia

(2017). Cultural variation in communal versus exchange norms: Implications for social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 81-94. doi:10.1037/pspi0000091

35.

Miller

J. G.

Bersoff

D. M.

(1994). Cultural influences on the moral status of reciprocity and the discounting of endogenous motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 592-602.

36.

Miller

J. G.

Das

Chakravarthy

(2011). Culture and the role of choice in agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 46-61. doi:10.1037/a0023330

37.

Morling

Kitayama

Miyamoto

(2002). Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 311-323.

38.

Muller

Judd

C. M.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

(2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.

39.

Nagpaul

Pang

J. S.

(2017). Materialism lowers well-being: The mediating role of the need for autonomy—Correlational and experimental evidence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 11-21. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12159

40.

Oyserman

Coon

H. M.

Kemmelmeier

(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.

41.

Perunovic

W. Q. E.

Heller

Ross

Komar

(2011). The within-person dynamics of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, affective states, and cultural identification: A diary study of bicultural individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 635-641. doi:10.1177/1948550611405071

42.

Ramsey

(2016). Confucian role ethics and relational autonomy in the Mengzi. Philosophy East and West, 66, 903-922.

43.

Rosemont

H. J.

(2006). Two loci of authority: Autonomous individuals and related persons. In Hershock

P. D.

Ames

R. T.

(Eds.), Confucian cultures of authority (pp. 1-20). Albany: State University of New York Press.

44.

Rosemont

H. J.

Ames

R. T.

(2016). Confucian role ethics: A moral vision for the 21st century? Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.

45.

Rudy

Sheldon

K. M.

Awong

Tan

H. H.

(2007). Autonomy, culture, and well-being: The benefits of inclusive autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 983-1007.

46.

Rudy

Sheldon

K. M.

Kamble

Palermo

(2015). Who chooses best? Explaining the interactive effect of culture and decision maker on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 471-488. doi:10.1177/0022022115572684

47.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

48.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2006a). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557-1585.

49.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2006b). The Self-Regulation Questionnaires. Retrieved from http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/selfreg.html

50.

Savani

Morris

M. W.

Naidu

N. V. R.

(2012). Deference in Indians’ decision making: Introjected goals or injunctive norms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 685-699. doi:10.1037/a0026415

51.

Savani

Morris

M. W.

Naidu

N. V. R.

Kumar

Berlia

N. V.

(2011). Cultural conditioning: Understanding interpersonal accommodation in India and the United States in terms of the modal characteristics of interpersonal influence situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 84-102. doi:10.1037/a0021083

52.

Shun

K.-L.

Wong

D. B.

(2004). Introduction. In Shun

K.-L.

Wong

D. B.

(Eds.), Confucian ethics: A comparative study of self, autonomy, and community (pp. 1-7). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

53.

Singelis

T. M.

Triandis

H. C.

Bhawuk

Gelfand

M. J.

(1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 29, 240-275.

54.

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

Van Petegem

(2015). Let us not throw out the baby with the bathwater: Applying the principle of universalism without uniformity to autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 44-49. doi:10.1111/cdep.12103

55.

Spencer-Rodgers

Boucher

H. C.

Mori

S. C.

Wang

Peng

(2009). The dialectical self-concept: Contradiction, change, and holism in East Asian cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 29-44.

56.

Triandis

H. C.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.

57.

Tymms

(2004). Effect sizes in multilevel models. In Schagen

Elliot

(Eds.), But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research (pp. 55-66). London, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.

58.

West

S. G.

Aiken

L. S.

Krull

J. L.

(1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1-48.

59.

Wong

D. B.

(2006). Natural moralities: A defense of pluralistic relativism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

60.

Wong

D. B.

(2017). Chinese ethics. In Zalta

E. N.

(Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017th ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/ethics-chinese/

61.

Gore

J. S.

Kanagawa

(2014). Relational motivation and well-being: A cross-cultural comparison. Japanese Psychological Research, 56, 320-330. doi:10.1111/jpr.12056

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB

8.20 MB