In this investigation of cultural differences in the experience of obligation, we distinguish between Confucian Role Ethics versus Relative Autonomy lay theories of motivation and illustrate them with data showing relevant cultural differences in both social judgments and intrapersonal experience. First, when judging others, Western European heritage culture (WEHC) participants (relative to Confucian heritage culture [CHC] participants) judged obligation-motivated actors more negatively than those motivated by agency (Study 1, N = 529). Second, in daily diary and situation sampling studies, CHC participants (relative to WEHC participants) perceived more congruency between their own agentic and obligated motivations, and more positive emotional associations with obligated motivations (Study 2, N = 200 and Study 3, N = 244). Agentic motivation, however, was universally associated with positive emotions. More research on a Role Ethics rather than Relative Autonomy conception of agency may improve our understanding of human motivation, especially across cultures.
AmesR. T. (2011). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
2.
AmesR. T.RosemontH. J. (2014). Family Reverence (xiao 孝）in the Analects: Confucian role ethics and the dynamics of intergenerational transmission. In OlberdingA. (Ed.), Dao companion to the analects (pp. 117-136). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
3.
BiesanzJ. C.FalkC. F.SavaleiV. (2010). Assessing mediational models: Testing and interval estimation for indirect effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 661-701.
4.
BiesanzJ. C.SchragerS. M. (2018). Sample size planning with effect size estimates. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5.
BockoverM. I. (2012). Confucian ritual as body language of self, society, and spirit. Sophia, 51, 177-194.
6.
BuchtelE. E. (2009). [Dialectical Self-Concept Scale, 32 items, among 546 UBC undergraduates]. Unpublished raw data.
7.
BuchtelE. E. (2014). Cultural sensitivity or cultural stereotyping? Positive and negative effects of a cultural psychology class. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 39, 40-52.
8.
BuchtelE. E.GuanY.PengQ.SuY.SangB.ChenS. X.BondM. H. (2015). Immorality East and West: Are immoral behaviors especially harmful, or especially uncivilized?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1382-1394. doi:10.1177/0146167215595606
9.
ChenB.VansteenkisteM.BeyersW.SoenensB.Van PetegemS. (2013). Autonomy in family decision making for Chinese adolescents: Disentangling the dual meaning of autonomy. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 1184-1209. doi:10.1177/0022022113480038
10.
ChengR. W.LamS. (2013). The interaction between social goals and self-construal on achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 136-148. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.01.001
11.
ChirkovV. I. (2014). The universality of psychological autonomy across cultures: Arguments from developmental and social psychology. In WeinsteinN. (Ed.), Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 27-51). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8542-6_2
12.
ChirkovV. I.RyanR. M.KimY.KaplanU. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97-109.
13.
DunlapW. P.CortinaJ. M.VaslowJ. B.BurkeM. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170-177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
14.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
15.
GelmanA. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27, 2865-2873. doi:10.1002/sim.3107
16.
GoreJ. S.CrossS. E. (2006). Pursuing goals for us: Relationally autonomous reasons in long-term goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 848-861.
17.
HamamuraT.HeineS. J.PaulhusD. L. (2008). Cultural differences in response styles: The role of dialectical thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 932-942. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.034
18.
HuangC.-Y.CheahC. S. L.LambM. E.ZhouN. (2017). Associations between parenting styles and perceived child effortful control within Chinese families in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 795-812. doi:10.1177/0022022117706108
19.
HuiC. M.FokH. K.BondM. H. (2009). Who feels more ambivalence? Linking dialectical thinking to mixed emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 493-498. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.022
20.
IyengarS. S.LepperM. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349-366.
21.
JiangT.GoreJ. S. (2016). The relationship between autonomous motivation and goal pursuit: A cross-cultural perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 101-111. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12115
22.
KantI. (1993). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals. In EllingtonJ. W. (Trans.), Grounding for the metaphysics of morals & on a supposed right to lie because of philanthropic concerns (pp. 7-62), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. (Original work published in 1785)
23.
KitayamaS.MesquitaB.KarasawaM. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 890-903.
24.
LiJ. (2003). The core of Confucian learning. American Psychologist, 58, 146-147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.146
25.
LiY.SheldonK. M.LiuR. (2015). Dialectical thinking moderates the effect of extrinsic motivation on intrinsic motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 89-95. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.03.019
26.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J.FritzM. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.
27.
MarkusH. R. (2016). What moves people to action? Culture and motivation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 161-166. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.028
28.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
29.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568-579.
30.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In Murphy-BermanV.BermanJ. J. (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (Vol. 49, pp. 1-57). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
31.
McShaneB. B.BöckenholtU. (2016). Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach. Psychological Methods, 21, 47-60. doi:10.1037/met0000036
32.
MenonU. (2013). The Hindu concept of self-refinement: Implicit yet meaningful. Psychology and Developing Societies, 25, 195-222. doi:10.1177/0971333613477320
33.
MillerJ. G. (2003). Culture and agency: Implications for psychological theories of motivation and social development. In Murphy-BermanV.BermanJ. J. (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (Vol. 49, pp. 59-99). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
34.
MillerJ. G.AkiyamaH.KapadiaS. (2017). Cultural variation in communal versus exchange norms: Implications for social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 81-94. doi:10.1037/pspi0000091
35.
MillerJ. G.BersoffD. M. (1994). Cultural influences on the moral status of reciprocity and the discounting of endogenous motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 592-602.
36.
MillerJ. G.DasR.ChakravarthyS. (2011). Culture and the role of choice in agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 46-61. doi:10.1037/a0023330
37.
MorlingB.KitayamaS.MiyamotoY. (2002). Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 311-323.
38.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
39.
NagpaulT.PangJ. S. (2017). Materialism lowers well-being: The mediating role of the need for autonomy—Correlational and experimental evidence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 11-21. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12159
40.
OysermanD.CoonH. M.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
41.
PerunovicW. Q. E.HellerD.RossM.KomarS. (2011). The within-person dynamics of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, affective states, and cultural identification: A diary study of bicultural individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 635-641. doi:10.1177/1948550611405071
42.
RamseyJ. (2016). Confucian role ethics and relational autonomy in the Mengzi. Philosophy East and West, 66, 903-922.
43.
RosemontH. J. (2006). Two loci of authority: Autonomous individuals and related persons. In HershockP. D.AmesR. T. (Eds.), Confucian cultures of authority (pp. 1-20). Albany: State University of New York Press.
44.
RosemontH. J.AmesR. T. (2016). Confucian role ethics: A moral vision for the 21st century?Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.
45.
RudyD.SheldonK. M.AwongT.TanH. H. (2007). Autonomy, culture, and well-being: The benefits of inclusive autonomy. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 983-1007.
46.
RudyD.SheldonK. M.LiY.KambleS.BiX.PalermoF. (2015). Who chooses best? Explaining the interactive effect of culture and decision maker on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 471-488. doi:10.1177/0022022115572684
47.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
48.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2006a). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will?Journal of Personality, 74, 1557-1585.
SavaniK.MorrisM. W.NaiduN. V. R. (2012). Deference in Indians’ decision making: Introjected goals or injunctive norms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 685-699. doi:10.1037/a0026415
51.
SavaniK.MorrisM. W.NaiduN. V. R.KumarS.BerliaN. V. (2011). Cultural conditioning: Understanding interpersonal accommodation in India and the United States in terms of the modal characteristics of interpersonal influence situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 84-102. doi:10.1037/a0021083
52.
ShunK.-L.WongD. B. (2004). Introduction. In ShunK.-L.WongD. B. (Eds.), Confucian ethics: A comparative study of self, autonomy, and community (pp. 1-7). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
SingelisT. M.TriandisH. C.BhawukD.GelfandM. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 29, 240-275.
54.
SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.Van PetegemS. (2015). Let us not throw out the baby with the bathwater: Applying the principle of universalism without uniformity to autonomy-supportive and controlling parenting. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 44-49. doi:10.1111/cdep.12103
55.
Spencer-RodgersJ.BoucherH. C.MoriS. C.WangL.PengK. (2009). The dialectical self-concept: Contradiction, change, and holism in East Asian cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 29-44.
56.
TriandisH. C.GelfandM. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
57.
TymmsP. (2004). Effect sizes in multilevel models. In SchagenI.ElliotK. (Eds.), But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research (pp. 55-66). London, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.
58.
WestS. G.AikenL. S.KrullJ. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1-48.
59.
WongD. B. (2006). Natural moralities: A defense of pluralistic relativism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
YiL.GoreJ. S.KanagawaC. (2014). Relational motivation and well-being: A cross-cultural comparison. Japanese Psychological Research, 56, 320-330. doi:10.1111/jpr.12056
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
