Four experiments uncovered an action dominance error by which people’s natural focus on actions hinders appropriate responses to social and nonsocial stimuli. This surprising error comprises higher rates of both omission (misses) and commission (false alarms) when, in responding to action and inaction demands, people have higher numbers of action targets. The action dominance error was verified over four experiments using an analog that required responses to words and to target individuals. Experiments 1 and 2 tested our hypotheses and distinguished the action error effect from the effects of practicing action or inaction responses. Experiment 3 linked the error to the greater cognitive load imposed by the higher proportion of action over inaction targets. Furthermore, Experiment 4 demonstrated that (a) there is a default tendency to pay more attention to action (vs. inaction) targets and (b) shifting focus to inaction targets reduces the action dominance error.
AlbarracínD.HandleyI. M. (2011). The time for doing is not the time for change: Effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 983-998. doi:10.1037/a0023245
2.
AlbarracínD.HandleyI. M.NoguchiK.McCullochK. C.LiH.LeeperJ.. . . HartW. P. (2008). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 510-523. doi:10.1037/a0012833
3.
AlbarracinD.HeplerJ.TannenbaumM. (2011). General action and inaction goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 119-123. doi:10.1177/0963721411402666
4.
AllisonS. T.MessickD. M. (1988). The feature-positive effect, attitude strength, and degree of perceived consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 231-241. doi:10.1177/0146167288142002
5.
BarghJ. (2014). Unconscious impulses and desires impel what we think and do in ways Freud never dreamed of. Scientific American, 310, 30-37. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0114-30
6.
BaronJ.RitovI. (2004). Omission bias, individual differences, and normality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 74-85. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.03.003
7.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111-135. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111
8.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
9.
CioffiD.GarnerR. (1996). On doing the decision: Effects of active versus passive choice on commitment and self-perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 133-147. doi:10.1177/0146167296222003
10.
DittrichW. H.LeaS. E. (1993). Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 115-129. doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.59-115
11.
EisenbergN.CumberlandA.SpinradT. L.FabesR. A.ShepardS. A.ReiserM.. . . GuthrieI. K. (2001). The relations of regulation and emotionality to children’s externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Child Development, 72, 1112-1134. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00337
12.
ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804
13.
FazioR. H.ShermanS. J.HerrP. M. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404-411. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.3.404
14.
FishbachA.ZhangY.KooM. (2009). The dynamics of self-regulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 315-344. doi:10.1080/10463280903275375
15.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.HigginsE. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 804-818. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.06.009
16.
FreitasA. L.LibermanN.HigginsE. T. (2002). Regulatory fit and resisting temptation during goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 291-298. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1504
17.
GendollaG. H. E.SilvestriniN. (2010). The implicit “go”: Masked action cues directly mobilize mental effort. Psychological Science, 21, 1389-1393. doi:10.1177/0956797610384149
18.
GoschkeT.KuhlJ. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211-1226. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1211
19.
HeplerJ.AlbarracinD. (2014). Liking more means doing more: Dispositional attitudes predict patterns of general action. Social Psychology, 45, 391-398. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000198
20.
HeplerJ.AlbarracinD.McCullochK. C.NoguchiK. (2012). Being active and impulsive: The role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 416-424. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4
21.
HeplerJ.WangW.AlbarracinD. (2012). Motivating exercise: The interactive effect of general action goals and past behavior on physical activity. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 365-370. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9267-0
22.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
23.
IrelandM. E.HeplerJ.LiH.AlbarracínD. (2015). Neuroticism and attitudes toward action in 19 countries. Journal of Personality, 83, 243-250. doi:10.1111/jopy.12099
24.
KahnemanD.MillerD. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
25.
KardesF. R.CronleyM. L.KimJ. (2006). Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 135-144. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1602_4
26.
KarshN.EitamB.MarkI.HigginsE. T. (2016). Bootstrapping agency: How control-relevant information affects motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1333-1350. doi:10.1037/xge0000212
27.
KruglanskiA. W.BélangerJ. J.ChenX.KöpetzC.PierroA.MannettiL. (2012). The energetics of motivated cognition: A force-field analysis. Psychological Review, 119, 1-20. doi:10.1037/a0025488
28.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331-378. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80008-9
29.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P.HigginsE. T.AtashM. N.PierroA.ShahJ. Y.SpiegelS. (2000). To “do the right thing” or to “just do it”: Locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 793-815. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.793
30.
KuhlJ. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13, 99-171. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-541413-5.50007-3
31.
LandmanJ. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-536. doi:10.1177/0146167287134009
32.
LenguaL. J. (2002). The contribution of emotionality and self-regulation to the understanding of children’s response to multiple risk. Child Development, 73, 144-161. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00397
33.
LevineR. V.NorenzayanA. (1999). The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 178-205. doi:10.1177/0022022199030002003
34.
LewinK. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
35.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (Edited by DorwinCartwright.). American Sociological Review, 16, 404-405.
36.
LosS. A.HeslenfeldD. J. (2005). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation: Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 52-72. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.52
37.
McCullochK. C.LiH.HongS.AlbarracinD. (2012). Naïve definitions of action and inaction: The continuum, spread, and valence of behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 227-234. doi:10.1002/ejsp.860
38.
MischelW.AydukO. (2004). Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system: The dynamics of delay of gratification. In BaumeisterR.F.VohsK.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications (pp. 99-129). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
39.
MitchellC.HallG. (2014). Can theories of animal discrimination explain perceptual learning in humans?Psychological Bulletin, 140, 283-307. doi:10.1037/a0032765
40.
MoskowitzG. B.LiP.KirkE. R. (2004). The implicit volition model: On the preconscious regulation of temporarily adopted goals. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 317-413. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36006-5
41.
NieuwenhuisS.YeungN.van den WildenbergW.RidderinkhofK. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26. doi:10.3758/CABN.3.1.17
42.
NoguchiK.HandleyI. M.AlbarracínD. (2011). Participating in politics resembles physical activity: General action patterns in international archives, United States archives, and experiments. Psychological Science, 22, 235-242. doi:10.1177/0956797610393746
43.
PashlerH. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
44.
RaverC. C.BlackburnE. K.BancroftM.TorpN. (1999). Relations between effective emotional self-regulation, attentional control, and low-income preschoolers’ social competence with peers. Early Education & Development, 10, 333-350. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed1003_6
45.
RhodesT.SingerM.BourgoisP.FriedmanS. R.StrathdeeS. A. (2005). The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1026-1044. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.024
46.
RuthruffB. (2007). Clinical review of Crohn’s disease. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 19, 383-437.
47.
SchorrT.GerjetsP.ScheiterK. (2003). Analyzing effects of goal competition and task difficulty in multiple-task performance: Volitional action control within ACT-R. Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
48.
ShahJ. Y. (2005). The automatic pursuit and management of goals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 10-13. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00325.x
49.
ShahJ. Y.FriedmanR.KruglanskiA. W. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261-1280. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1261
50.
ShodaY.MischelW.PeakeP. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978-986. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.978
51.
SimmondsD. J.PekarJ. J.MostofskyS. H. (2008). Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia, 46, 224-232. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.015
52.
SimonH. A. (1967). Motivational and emotional controls of cognition. Psychological Review, 74, 29-39. doi:10.1037/h0024127
53.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
54.
Van der MolenM. W.BoomsmaD. I.JenningsJ. R.NieuwboerR. T. (1989). Does the heart know what the eye sees? A cardiac/pupillometric analysis of motor preparation and response execution. Psychophysiology, 26, 70-80. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb03134.x
55.
WhiteR. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333. doi:10.1037/h0040934
56.
WilsonT. D.ReinhardD. A.WestgateE. C.GilbertD. T.EllerbeckN.HahnC.. . . ShakedA. (2014). Just think: The challenges of the disengaged mind. Science, 345, 75-77. doi:10.1126/science.1250830
57.
WrightR. A.BrehmJ. W. (1989). Energization and goal attractiveness. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology (pp. 169–210). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
ZellE.SuR.LiH.HoM.-H. R.HongS.KumkaleT.. . . AlbarracinD. (2013). Cultural differences in attitudes toward action and inaction: The role of dialecticism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 521-528. doi:10.1177/1948550612468774
59.
ZhouZ.YuR.ZhouX. (2010). To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3606-3613. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
