CrandallC. S.ShermanJ. W. (2016). On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 93-99.
2.
EbersoleC. R.AthertonO. E.BelangerA. L.SkulborstadH. M.AllenJ. M.BanksJ. B.. . . BrownE. R. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68-82.
3.
FisherR. A. (1947.). The design of experiments (4th ed.). Edinburgh, UK: Oliver and Boyd.
4.
FunderD. C.LevineJ. M.MackieD. M.MorfC. C.SansoneC.VazireS.WestS. G. (2014). Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 3-12.
5.
GreenwaldA. G. (2012). There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 99-108.
6.
KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B.AckermanR. A.RussellD. W. (2009). Reporting and interpreting research in PSPB: Practices, principles, and pragmatics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1131-1142.
7.
KitcherP. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.XuM. (2017). Replicating and fixing failed replications: The case of need for cognition and argument quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 178-183.
9.
SimonsD. J.ShodaY.LindsayD. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123-1128.
ThagardP. R. (1978). Why astrology is a pseudoscience. In AsquithP. D.HackingI. (Eds.), Philosophy of science association (Vol. 1), pp. 223-234. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.