Majority views are reported with greater confidence and fluency than minority views, with the difference increasing with majority size. This Prototypical Majority Effect (PME) was attributed generally to conformity pressure, but Koriat et al. showed that it can arise from the processes underlying decision and confidence independent of social influence. Here we examined the PME under conditions that differ in social influence. In Experiment 1, a robust PME emerged in the absence of information about the majority views, but the provision sof that information increased the choice of the majority view and magnified the PME. In Experiment 2, a PME emerged in a minority-biased condition that misled participants to believe that the majority view was the minority view, but the PME was stronger in a majority-biased condition. The results were discussed in terms of a dual-process view: The PME observed under social influence may contain externally driven and internally driven components.
AlbaJ. W.MarmorsteinH. (1987). The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 14-25. doi:10.1086/209089
2.
ArkesH. R.HackettC.BoehmL. (1989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 81-94. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960020203
3.
ArmeliusK. (1979). Task predictability and performance as determinants of confidence in multiple-cue judgments. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 19-25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1979.tb00678
4.
AschS. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In GuetzkowH. (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Publishing.
5.
AschS. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.
6.
BaconF. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 241–252. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241
7.
BaranskiJ. V.PetrusicW. M. (1998). Probing the locus of confidence judgments: Experiments on the time to determine confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 929-945. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.929
8.
BassiliJ. N. (2003). The minority slowness effect: Subtle inhibitions in the expression of views not shared by others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 261-276. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.261
9.
BatesD. M.MaechlerM.BolkerB. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
10.
BergerI. E.MitchellA. A. (1989). The effect of advertising on attitude accessibility, attitude confidence, and the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 16,269-279. doi.org/10.1086/209213
11.
BovardE. W. (1951). Group structure and perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 398-405. doi:10.1037/h0058994
12.
BrewerW. F.SampaioC. (2012). The metamemory approach to confidence: A test using semantic memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 59-77. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.04.002
13.
BriñolP.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2013). Ease and persuasion: Multiple processes, meanings, and effects. In UnkelbachC.GreifenederR. (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 101-118). London, England: Psychology Press.
14.
CialdiniR. B.TrostM. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15.
ClarksonJ. J.TormalaZ. L.DeSensiV. L.WheelerS. C. (2009). Does attitude certainty beget self-certainty?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 436-439. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.004
16.
ClementR. W.KruegerJ. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in perceptions of social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279-299. doi:10.1348/014466600164471
17.
CranoW. D.PrislinR. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345-374. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034
18.
ErbH. P.BohnerG. (2001). Mere consensus effects in minority and majority influence. In De DreuC. K. W.De VriesN. K. (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 40-59). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19.
FazioR. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
21.
GillM. J.SwannW. B.Jr.SilveraD. H. (1998). On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1101-1114. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1101
22.
GlynnC. J.HayesA. F.ShanahanJ. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out a meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 452-463. doi:10.1086/297808
23.
GreenP.MacLeodC. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 493-498. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12504
24.
HasherL.GoldsteinD.ToppinoT. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1
25.
HugeM. E.GlynnC. J. (2013). Hesitation blues: Does minority opinion status lead to delayed responses?Communication Research, 40, 287-307. doi:10.1177/0093650211435505
26.
KoriatA. (2011). Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: A test of the self-consistency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 117-139. doi:10.1037/a0022171
27.
KoriatA. (2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80-113. doi:10.1037/a0025648
28.
KoriatA. (2013). Confidence in personal preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 247-259. doi:10.1002/bdm.1758
29.
KoriatA. (2015). When two heads are better than one and when they can be worse: The amplification hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 934-950. doi:10.1037/xge0000092
30.
KoriatA.AdivS. (2011). The construction of attitudinal judgments: Evidence from attitude certainty and response latency. Social Cognition, 29, 577-611. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.5.577
31.
KoriatA.AdivS. (2012). Confidence in one’s social beliefs: Implications for belief justification. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1599-1616. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.08.008
32.
KoriatA.AdivS. (2016). The self-consistency theory of subjective confidence. In DunloskyJ.TauberS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 127-147). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
KoriatA.AdivS.SchwarzN. (2016). Views that are shared with others are expressed with greater confidence and greater fluency independent of any social influence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 176-193. doi:10.1177/1088868315585269
34.
KoriatA.GoldsmithM. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103, 490-517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
35.
KoriatA.SorkaH. (2015). The construction of categorization judgments: Using subjective confidence and response latency to test a distributed model. Cognition, 134, 21-38. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.009
36.
KrosnickJ. A.PettyR. E. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
KruegerJ. I. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 164-240. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60384-6
38.
KruegerJ. I. (2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1-35. doi:10.1080/10463280701284645
39.
KruegerJ. I.AcevedoM.RobbinsJ. M. (2005). Self as sample. In FiedlerK.JuslinP. (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 353-377). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
KurmanJ.Ronen-EilonC. (2004). Lack of knowledge of a culture’s social axioms and adaptation difficulties among immigrants. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 35, 192-208. doi:10.1177/0022022103262244
41.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2016). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models R package version 2.0-30 [Software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
42.
LeungK.BondM. H.De CarrasquelS. R.MuozC.HernandezM.MurakamiF.. . . SingelisT. M. (2002). Social axioms the search for universal dimensions of general beliefs about how the world functions. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 33, 286-302. doi:10.1177/0022022102033003005
43.
LuusC. A. E.WellsG. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714-723. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.714
44.
Noelle-NeumannE. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43-51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
45.
OriveR. (1988a). Group consensus, action immediacy, and opinion confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 573-577. doi:10.1177/0146167288143016
46.
OriveR. (1988b). Social projection and social comparison of opinions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 953-964. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.953
47.
PetrocelliJ. V.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 30-41. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30
48.
PettyR. E.BriñolP.TormalaZ. L.WegenerD. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254-284). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
PrislinR.WoodW. (2005). Social influence in attitudes and attitude change. In AlbarracínD.JohnsonB. T.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 671-706). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
QuenéH.van den BerghH. (2004). On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43, 103-121. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2004.02.004
51.
SchwarzN. (1994). Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. In ZannaM. (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, (Vol. 26, pp. 123-162). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52.
SchwarzN. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25, 638-656. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638
53.
SchwarzN. (2015). Metacognition. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.BorgidaE.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Attitudes and social cognition (pp. 203-229). Washington, DC: APA. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60153-7
54.
ShawJ. S.III. (1996). Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 126-146. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.2.2.126
55.
SlovicP. (1966). Cue-consistency and cue-utilization in judgment. The American Journal of Psychology, 79, 427-434. doi:10.2307/1420883
56.
SniezekJ. A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 124-155. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90048-C
57.
StangorC.SechristG. B.JostJ. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 27, 484-494. doi:10.1177/0146167201274009
58.
StasserG.DavisJ. H. (1981). Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. Psychological Review, 88, 523-551. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.6.523
59.
SurowieckiJ. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
60.
ThompsonA.FineG. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 278-302. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_1
61.
VisserP. S.MirabileR. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779-795. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.779
62.
WhiteK.DahlD. W. (2006). To be or not be: The influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 404-414. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_11
63.
WilsonG. D.PattersonJ. R. (1970). Manual for the Conservatism Scale. Wisdor, UK: NFER Publishing.
64.
WoodW. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539-570. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539
65.
YanivI.Choshen-HillelS.MilyavskyM. (2009). Spurious consensus and opinion revision: Why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 558-563. doi:10.1037/a0014589
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
