Why do men view morally questionable behaviors as more permissible than women do? Five studies investigated emotional factors as explanations for gender differences in moral decision-making. In Study 1 (N = 324), gender differences in perceptions of moral wrongness were explained by guilt and shame proneness. Studies 2a and 2b (combined N = 562) demonstrated that instructions to adopt an unemotional perspective (vs. standard instructions) led women to have higher immoral intentions, no longer lower than men’s, as they were in the control group. Studies 3 and 4 (N = 834) showed that men expected immoral actions to result in higher positive and lower self-conscious moral emotions than women do. Study 4 (N = 424) showed that these emotional expectancies account for gender differences in immoral intentions. Study 5 (N = 450) showed that women—but not men—experience heightened self-conscious moral emotions and regret when recalling past transgressions done for personal gain.
AquinoK.ReedA. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423-1440. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423
2.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2008). The prediction of honesty–Humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216-1228. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006
3.
Baron-CohenS.WheelwrightS. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163-175. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
4.
BarrettL. F.RobinL.PietromonacoP. R.EyssellK. M. (1998). Are women the “more emotional” sex? Evidence from emotional experiences in social context. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 555-578. doi:10.1080/026999398379565
5.
BemS. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Stanford, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
6.
Benetti-McQuoidJ.BursikK. (2005). Individual differences in experiences of and responses to guilt and shame: Examining the lenses of gender and gender role. Sex Roles, 53, 133-142. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-4287-4
7.
BorkowskiS. C.UgrasY. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1117-1127. doi:10.1023/A:1005748725174
8.
BrebnerJ. (2003). Gender and emotions. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 387-394. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00059-4
9.
BrodyL. R. (2000). The socialization of gender differences in emotional expression: Display rules, infant temperament, and differentiation. In FischerA. H.FischerA. H. (Eds.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 24-47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BrodyL. R.HallJ. A. (2010). Gender and emotion in context. In LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M.BarrettL. F. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions, 3rd ed. (pp. 395-408). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
Christov-MooreL.SimpsonE. A.CoudéG.GrigaityteK.IacoboniM.FerrariP. F. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46(Part4), 604-627. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001
12.
ClarkJ. W.DawsonL. E. (1996). Personal religiousness and ethical judgements: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 359-372. doi:10.1007/BF00382959
13.
CohenT. R.PanterA. T.TuranN. (2013). Predicting counterproductive work behavior from guilt proneness. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 45-53. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1326-2
14.
CohenT. R.WolfS. T.PanterA. T.InskoC. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 947-966. doi:10.1037/a0022641
15.
DaltonD.OrtegrenM. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 73-93. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8
16.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
17.
DetertJ. R.TreviñoL. K.SweitzerV. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374-391. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374
18.
DienerE.SandvikE.LarsenR. J. (1985). Age and sex effects for emotional intensity. Developmental Psychology, 21, 542-546. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.21.3.542
EaglyA. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644-658. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644
21.
EaglyA. H.WoodW. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306-315. doi:10.1177/0146167291173011
22.
EisenbergN.LennonR. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100-131. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100
23.
EisenbergN.MillerP. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 91-119. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91
24.
Else-QuestN. M.HigginsA.AllisonC.MortonL. C. (2012). Gender differences in self-conscious emotional experience: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 947-981. doi:10.1037/a0027930
25.
FrankeG. R.CrownD. F.SpakeD. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 920-934. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.920
26.
FriesdorfR.ConwayP.GawronskiB. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 696-713. doi:10.1177/0146167215575731
27.
GloverS. H.BumpusM. A.SharpG. F.MunchusG. A. (2002). Gender differences in ethical decision making. Women in Management Review, 17, 217-227. doi:10.1108/09649420210433175
28.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
29.
GorsuchR.McPhersonS. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-Revised and Single-Item Scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348-354. doi:10.2307/1386745
30.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385. doi:10.1037/a0021847
31.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
32.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
33.
HelzerE. G.PizarroD. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22, 517-522. doi:10.1177/0956797611402514
34.
HessU.SenécalS.KirouacG.HerreraP.PhilippotP.KleckR. E. (2000). Emotional expressivity in men and women: Stereotypes and self-perceptions. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 609-642. doi:10.1080/02699930050117648
35.
IckesW.GesnP. R.GrahamT. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?Personal Relationships, 7, 95-109. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00006.x
36.
JosephsR. A.MarkusH. R.TafarodiR. W. (1992). Gender and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 391-402. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.391
37.
KennedyJ. A.KrayL. J. (2013). Who is willing to sacrifice ethical values for money and social status? Gender differences in reactions to ethical compromises. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 5, 52-59. doi:10.1177/1948550613482987
38.
KennedyJ. A.KrayL. J.KuG. (2017). A social-cognitive approach to understanding gender differences in negotiator ethics: The role of moral identity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138, 28-44. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.11.003
39.
KohlbergL. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. In HoffmanM. L.HoffmanL.W. (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. I, pp. 381-431). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
LeeJ. J.GinoF. (2015). Poker-faced morality: Concealing emotions leads to utilitarian decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 49-64. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.006
41.
MarshH. W.AntillJ. K.CunninghamJ. D. (1987). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny: Relations to self-esteem and social desirability. Journal of Personality, 55, 661-685. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00457.x
42.
McCabeA.IngramR.Dato-onM. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 101-116. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3327-x
43.
Nunner-WinklerG.Meyer-NikeleM.WohlrabD. (2007). Gender differences in moral motivation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 26-52. doi:10.1353/mpq.2007.0003
44.
OnesD. S.ViswesvaranC.ReissA. D. (1996). Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 660-679. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.660
45.
OrtmannA.TichyL. K. (1999). Gender differences in the laboratory: Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39, 327-339. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00038-4
46.
PaulhusD. L.ReidD. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307-317. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.307
47.
PaulhusD. L.TrapnellP. D. (2008). Self-presentation on personality scales: An agency-communion framework. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 493-517). New York, NY: Guilford.
48.
RosenJ. B.BrandM.KalbeE. (2016). Empathy mediates the effects of age and sex on altruistic moral decision making. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10.
49.
RoweD. C.VazsonyiA. T.FlanneryD. J. (1995). Sex differences in crime: Do means and within-sex variation have similar causes?Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 32, 84-100. doi:10.1177/0022427895032001004
50.
RudmanL. A.PhelanJ. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61-79.
51.
RueckertL.NaybarN. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 67, 162-167.
52.
ShiotaM. N.LevensonR. W. (2009). Effects of aging on experimentally instructed detached reappraisal, positive reappraisal, and emotional behavior suppression. Psychology and Aging, 24, 890-900. doi:10.1037/a0017896
53.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. L.StappJ. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43.
54.
TangneyJ. P.DearingR. L. (2002). Gender differences in morality. In BornsteinR. F.MaslingJ. M. (Eds.), The psychodynamics of gender and gender role (pp. 251-269). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.HafezL. (2011). Shame, guilt, and remorse: Implications for offender populations. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22, 706-723. doi:10.1080/14789949.2011.617541
56.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345-372.
57.
TibbettsS. G.HerzD. C. (1996). Gender differences in factors of social control and rational choice. Deviant Behavior, 17, 183-208. doi:10.1080/01639625.1996.9968022
58.
TrzebiatowskaM.BruceS. (2012). Why are women more religious than men?Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
UzielL. (2010). Rethinking social desirability scales from impression management to interpersonally oriented self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 243-262. doi:10.1177/1745691610369465
60.
VispoelW. P.Forte FastE. E. (2000). Response biases and their relation to sex differences in multiple domains of self-concept. Applied Measurement in Education, 13, 79-97. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame1301_4
61.
WardS. J.KingL. A. (2017). Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/pspp0000153
62.
WebbT. L.MilesE.SheeranP. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 775-808. doi:10.1037/a0027600
63.
WhitleyB. E.Jr. (2001). Gender differences in affective responses to having cheated: The mediating role of attitudes. Ethics & Behavior, 11, 249-259.
64.
WhittleS.YücelM.YapM. H.AllenN. B. (2011). Sex differences in the neural correlates of emotion: Evidence from neuroimaging. Biological Psychology, 87, 319-333. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.05.003
65.
WilliamsJ. E.BestD. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
66.
WittM. G.WoodW. (2010). Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Sex Roles, 62, 635-646. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9761-y
67.
WoodW.EaglyA. H. (2009). Gender identity. In LearyM.HoyleR. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences (pp. 109-128). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
