It has been argued that “we feel the pain of others’ ostracism as our own”. However, it is unknown whether observed ostracism is as distressing as self-experienced ostracism. We conducted two studies to address this lacuna. In Study 1, participants played or observed an online ball-tossing game, in which they or a stranger were ostracized or included by others. In Study 2, participants imagined themselves or someone else being ostracized or included. Across both studies, self-experienced and observed ostracism had the same negative effect on mood. Also, both self-experienced and observed ostracism evoked need threat, but this effect was slightly lower after observed ostracism. In sum, the findings suggest that we do feel the pain of others’ ostracism as our own, consistent with the notion that humans are equipped with a system that detects violations of social inclusion norms in the environment.
AvenantiA.SiriguA.AgliotiS. M. (2010). Racial bias reduces empathic sensorimotor resonance with other-race pain. Current Biology, 20, 1018-1022. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.071
2.
AydinN.FischerP.FreyD. (2010). Turning to God in the face of ostracism: Effects of social exclusion on religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 742-753. doi:10.1177/0146167210367491
3.
BarghJ. A. (1982). Attention and automaticity in the processing of self-relevant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 425-436.
4.
BatsonD.EarlyS.SalvaraniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751-758. doi:10.1177/0146167297237008
5.
BeeneyJ. E.FranklinR. G.Jr.LevyK. N.AdamsR. B.Jr. (2011). I feel your pain: Emotional closeness modulates neural responses to empathically experienced rejection. Social Neuroscience, 6, 369-376. doi:10.1080/17470919.2011.557245
6.
CampbellD. T. (1983). Two distinct routes beyond kin selection to ultrasociality: Implications for the humanities and social sciences. In BridgemanD. (Ed.), The nature of prosocial development: Theories and strategies (pp. 11-41). New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
ChenZ.WilliamsK. D. (2012). Imagined future social pain hurts more now than imagined future physical pain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 314-317. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1861
8.
CherryE. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979.
9.
CloreG. L.SchwarzN.ConwayM. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In WyerR. S.SrullT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
CoyneS. M.NelsonD. A.RobinsonS. L.GundersenN. C. (2011). Is viewing ostracism on television distressing?Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 213-217. doi:10.1080/00224540903365570
11.
DandurandF.ShultzT. R.OnishiK. H. (2008). Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 428-434. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.2.428
12.
DecetyJ.ChaminadeT. (2003). When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view of psychological identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 577-596. doi:10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00076-X
13.
EisenbergerN. I.LiebermanM. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294-300. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.010
14.
EisenbergerN. I.LiebermanM. D.WilliamsK. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290-292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
16.
HeiderF.SimmelM. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259. doi:10.2307/1416950
17.
HoergerM. (2010). Participant dropout as a function of survey length in internet-mediated university studies: Implications for study design and voluntary participation in psychological research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 697-700. doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0445
18.
KerrN. L.LevineJ. M. (2008). The detection of social exclusion: Evolution and beyond. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 39-52. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.12.1.39
19.
KerrN. L.SeokD. H.PoulsenJ. R.HarrisD. W.MesséL. A. (2008). Social ostracism and group motivation gain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 736-746. doi:10.1002/ejsp.499
20.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L.ArkinR. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816-822. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02162.x
21.
LammC.DecetyJ.SingerT. (2011). Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage, 54, 2492-2502. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014
22.
LauG.MouldsM. L.RichardsonR. (2009). Ostracism: How much it hurts depends on how you remember it. Emotion, 9, 430-434. doi:10.1037/a0015350
23.
LegateN.DeHaanC. R.WeinsteinN.RyanR. M. (2013). Hurting you hurts me too: The psychological costs of complying with ostracism. Psychological Science, 24, 583-588. doi:10.1177/0956797612457951
24.
LutzM. A. (2001). On the norm of equality. International Journal of Social Economics, 28, 782-799. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006124
25.
MastenC. L.EisenbergerN. I.PfeiferJ. H.ColichN. L.DaprettoM. (2013). Associations among pubertal development, empathic ability, and neural responses while witnessing peer rejection in adolescence. Child Development, 84, 1338-1354. doi:10.1111/cdev.12056
26.
MastenC. L.EisenbergerN. I.PfeiferJ. H.DaprettoM. (2013). Neural responses to witnessing peer rejection after being socially excluded: fMRI as a window into adolescents’ emotional processing. Developmental Science, 16, 743-759. doi:10.1111/desc.12056
27.
MastenC. L.MorelliS. A.EisenbergerN. I. (2011). An fMRI investigation of empathy for “social pain” and subsequent prosocial behavior. Neuroimage, 55, 381-388. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.060
28.
MeyerM. L.MastenC. L.MaY.WangC.ShiZ.EisenbergerN. I.HanS. (2013). Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 446-454. doi:10.1093/scan/nss019
PfundmairM.GraupmannV.FreyD.AydinN. (2015). The different behavioral intentions of collectivists and individualists in response to social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 363-378. doi:10.1177/0146167214566186
31.
PrestonS. D.de WaalF. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1-20. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018
32.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgements of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
33.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In HigginsE.T.KruglanskiA. (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (pp. 433-465). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
SingerT.LammC. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81-96. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x
35.
SpoorJ. R.WilliamsK. D. (2007). The evolution of an ostracism detection system. In ForgasJ. P.HaseltonM. G.von HippelW. (Eds.), Evolution and the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and social cognition (pp. 279-292). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
36.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metaphor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
37.
WagemansJ.ElderJ. H.KubovyM.PalmerS. E.PetersonM. A.SinghM.von der HeydtR. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1172-1217. doi:10.1037/a0029333
38.
WertheimerM. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, II [Investigations in Gestalt Theory: II. Laws of organization in perceptual forms]. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350.
39.
WesselmannE. D.BaggD.WilliamsK. D. (2009). “I feel your pain”: The effects of observing ostracism on the ostracism detection system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1308-1311. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.003
40.
WesselmannE. D.WilliamsK. D.HalesA. H. (2013). Vicarious ostracism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 153. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00153
41.
WilliamsK. D. (2001). Ostracism: The power of silence. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
42.
WilliamsK. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
43.
WilliamsK. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275-314. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1
44.
WilliamsK. D.CheungK. T. C.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.748
45.
WilliamsK. D.NidaS. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 71-75. doi:10.1177/0963721411402480
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
