Previous work has found that individuals who have been confronted for discrimination demonstrate a reduction in explicit prejudice and use fewer stereotypes immediately after the confrontation. Although confronting prejudice has been touted as a tool for prejudice reduction, it is not known how these effects translate over time and what processes might account for their endurance. Across two studies, the present research finds that individuals used significantly fewer negative stereotypes 7 days after confrontation (Study 1) and engaged in behavioral inhibition to stereotypical cues on a probe task 1 week after confrontation. Moreover, guilt and prolonged rumination mediated these effects for confronted participants (Studies 1 and 2). Across two studies, the present studies reveal the lasting effects of interpersonal confrontations in prejudice reduction and the process by which these effects endure.
AmodioD. M.DevineP. G.Harmon-JonesE. (2007). A dynamic model of guilt implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice. Psychological Science, 18, 524-530.
2.
AmodioD. M.DevineP. G.Harmon-JonesE. (2008). Individual differences in the regulation of intergroup bias: The role of conflict monitoring and neural signals for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 60-74.
3.
BarghJ. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
BarnhoornJ. S.HaasnootE.BocanegraB. R.van SteenbergenH. (2015). QRTEngine: An easy solution for running online reaction time experiments using Qualtrics. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 918-929.
5.
BlanchardF. A.LillyT.VaughnL. A. (1991). Reducing the expression of racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 2, 101-105.
6.
BoysenG. A. (2013). Confronting math stereotypes in the classroom: Its effect on female college students’ sexism and perceptions of confronters. Sex Roles, 69, 297-307.
7.
BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.HarveyR. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
8.
ChaneyK. E.YoungD. M.SanchezD. T. (2015). Confrontation’s Health Outcomes and Promotion of Egalitarianism (C-HOPE) framework. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1, 363-371.
9.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359-378.
10.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J. (2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 532-544. doi:10.1177/0146167202250923
11.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J.MarkA. Y. (2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784-803. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.784
12.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
13.
DevineP. G.ForscherP. S.AustinA. J.CoxW. T. L. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1267-1278. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003
14.
DevineP. G.MonteithM. J. (1993). The role of discrepancy-associated affect in prejudice reduction. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 317-344). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
DevineP. G.MonteithM. J.ZuwerinkJ. R.ElliotA. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817-830.
16.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
HamJ.VonkR. (2003). Smart and easy: Co-occurring activation of spontaneous trait inferences and spontaneous situational inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 434-447.
18.
LatuI. M. (2010). Reducing automatic stereotype activation: Mechanisms and moderators of situational attribution training (Doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
19.
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavioral Research Methods, 47, 1122-1135.
20.
MallettR. K.WagnerD. E. (2011). The unexpectedly positive consequences of confronting sexism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 215-220. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.001
21.
MartinL. L.TesserA. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. Advances in Social Cognition, 9, 1-47.
22.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1005-1017.
23.
MinearM.ParkD. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630-633.
24.
MonteithM. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice-reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469-485.
25.
MonteithM. J.Ashburn-NardoL.VoilsC. I.CzoppA. M. (2002). Putting the brakes on prejudice: On the development and operation of cues for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1029-1050. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1029
26.
MonteithM. J.DeneenN. E.ToomanG. D. (1996). The effect of social norm activation on the expression of opinions concerning gay men and Blacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 267-288.
27.
MonteithM. J.MarkA. Y.Ashburn-NardoL. (2010). The self-regulation of prejudice: Toward understanding its lived character. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 183-200.
28.
MonteithM. J.VoilsC. I. (1998). Proneness to prejudiced responses: Toward understanding the authenticity of self-reported discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 901-916.
29.
MoskowitzG. B.GollwitzerP. M.WaselW.SchaalB. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167-184.
30.
MoskowitzG. B.IgnarriC. (2009). Implicit volition and stereotype control. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 97-145.
31.
MoskowitzG. B.LiP. (2011). Egalitarian goals trigger stereotype inhibition: A proactive form of stereotype control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 103-116.
32.
PascoeE. A.Smart RichmanL. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 531-544.
33.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 811-832.
34.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2009). The active control of prejudice: Unpacking the intentions guiding control efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 640-652.
35.
ProninE.LinD. Y.RossL. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369-381.
36.
RichardsJ.GrossJ. (2000). Emotion regulation and memory: The cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 410-424.
37.
SanchezD. T.ChaneyK. E.ManuelS. K.WiltonL. S.RemediosJ. D. (2017). Stigma by prejudice transfer: Racism threatens White women and sexism threatens men of color. Psychological Science, 28, 445-461.
38.
SchmaderT.JohnsM. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452.
39.
SegerstromS. C.StantonA. L.AldenL. E.ShortridgeB. E. (2003). A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: What’s on your mind, and how, and how much?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 909-921.
40.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359-1366.
41.
StöberJ. (1998). Worry, problem elaboration and suppression of imagery: The role of concreteness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 751-756.
42.
SueD. W.CapodilupoC. M.TorinoG. C.BucceriJ. M.HolderA.NadalK. L.EsquilinM. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62, 271-286.
43.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31-53.
44.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FitzgeraldD. C.BylsmaW. H. (2003). African American college students’ experiences with everyday racism: Characteristics of and responses to these incidents. Journal of Black Psychology, 29, 38-67.
45.
SzabóM.LovibondP. F. (2004). The cognitive content of thought-listed worry episodes in clinic-referred anxious and nonreferred children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 613-622.
46.
SzabóM.LovibondP. F. (2006). Worry episodes and perceived problem solving: A diary-based approach. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 19, 175-187.
47.
TedeschiR. G.CalhounL. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1-18.
48.
UllrichP. M.LutgendorfS. K. (2002). Journaling about stressful events: Effects of cognitive processing and emotional expression. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 244-250.
49.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82-96.
50.
WatkinsE. (2004). Adaptive and maladaptive ruminative self-focus during emotional processing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1037-1052.
51.
WatkinsE.MouldsM. (2005). Distinct modes of ruminative self-focus: Impact of abstract versus concrete rumination on problem solving in depression. Emotion, 5, 319-328.
52.
WilliamsJ. M. G. (1996). Depression and the specificity of autobiographical memory. In RubinD. C. (Ed.), Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory (pp. 244-267). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
