From 1882 to 1926, lynch mobs in Georgia killed 514 victims in 410 separate events. Based on a new comprehensive dataset, this study examined characteristics of the mobs related to the level of the atrocity of the violence in the lynchings. Consistent with prior research, the size of the crowd was a stable predictor of level of atrocity. However, in contrast to two prior studies, results did not uniformly support the self-attention perspective. Instead, the findings were more consistent with the concept that situational norms were the important mechanism behind collective violence, particularly because the violence used in a lynching event reflected the violence used in nearby lynchings. These results suggest that, rather than losing all norms of behavior through a process of deindividuation, lynchers adopted norms they viewed as appropriate for the situation.
AllenJ.AlsH.LewisJ.LitwackL. F. (2000). Without sanctuary: Lynching photography in America. Santa Fe, New Mexico: Twin Palms.
2.
AllenJ.LittlefieldJ. (2005). Without sanctuary: Lynching photography in America. Available from http://withoutsanctuary.org/
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
AnselinL. (1996). The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. In FischerM.ScholtenH.UnwinD. (Eds.), Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS in environmental and socio-economic sciences (pp. 111-125). London, England: Taylor & Francis.
5.
ApelD. (2004). Imagery of lynching: Black men, White women, and the mob. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
AviramR. B. (2009). The relational origins of prejudice: A convergence of psychoanalytic and social cognitive perspectives. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.
7.
BaileyA. K.TolnayS. E. (2015). Lynched: The victims of Southern mob violence. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
8.
BallerR. D.AnselinL.MessnerS. F.DeaneG.HawkinsD. F. (2001). Structural covariates of U.S. county homicide rates: Incorporating spatial effects. Criminology, 39, 561-588.
9.
BlackD. J. (1983). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review, 48, 34-45.
10.
BlackD. J. (1993). The social structure of right and wrong. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
12.
BrundageW. F. (1993). Lynching in the new South: Georgia and Virginia, 1880-1930. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
13.
CooneyM. (2003). The privatization of violence. Criminology, 41, 1377-1406.
14.
CornellD. G. (1996). Coding guide for violent incidents: Instrumental versus hostile/reactive aggression. Charlottesville: Curry School of Education, University of Virginia.
15.
CorzineJ.CreechJ.CorzineL. (1983). Black concentration and lynchings in the South: Testing Blalock’s power-threat hypothesis. Social Forces, 61, 774-796.
16.
CostalliS.MoroF. N. (2012). Ethnicity and strategy in the Bosnian civil war: Explanations for the severity of violence in Bosnian municipalities. Journal of Peace Research, 49, 801-815.
17.
CrandallC.StangorC. (2005). Conformity and prejudice. In DovidioJ. F.GlickP. S.RudmanL. A. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.
18.
DienerE. (1980). Deindividuation: The absence of self-awareness and self-regulation in group members. In PaulusP. B. (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 209-242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
DoernerJ. K.DemuthS. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1-27.
20.
FestingerL.PepitoneA.NewcombT. (1952). Some consequences of de-individuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382-389.
21.
FirthD. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80, 27-38.
22.
FujiiL. A. (2013). The puzzle of extra-lethal violence. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 410-426.
23.
GergenK. J.GergenM. M.BartonW. (1973). Deviance in the dark. Psychology Today, 7(5), 129-130.
24.
GinzburgR. (1962). 100 years of lynchings. New York, NY: Lancer.
25.
GrometD. M.DarleyJ. M. (2009). Retributive and restorative justice: Importance of crime severity and shared identity in people’s justice responses. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61, 50-57.
26.
GruenewaldJ.ChermakS. M.PizarroJ. M. (2013). Covering victims in the news: What makes minority homicides newsworthy?Justice Quarterly, 30, 755-783.
27.
GuttmanL. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139-150.
28.
HayesA. F.KrippendorffK. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
29.
HigginbothamC. (2016, April7). Lynching, politics, and the spectacle of race: Reginald Marsh circa 1934 (Unpublished talk). Palmer Museum of Art, Pennsylvania State University.
JacobsD.CarmichaelJ. T. (2001). The politics of punishment across time and space: A pooled time-series analysis of imprisonment rates. Social Forces, 80, 61-89.
32.
JohnsonR. D.DowningL. L. (1979). Deindividuation and valence of cues: Effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1532-1538.
33.
Jong-GierveldJ.de KamphulsF. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289-299.
34.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30, 411-433.
35.
LeaderT.MullenB.AbramsD. (2007). Without mercy: The immediate impact of group size on lynch mob atrocity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1340-1352.
MartinA. W.McPhailC.McCarthyJ. D. (2009). Why targets matter: Toward a more inclusive model of collective violence. American Sociological Review, 74, 821-841.
38.
MarxG. T. (1999). What’s in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. The Information Society, 15, 99-112.
39.
McGloinJ. M.PiqueroA. R. (2009). “I wasn’t alone”: Collective behaviour and violent delinquency. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 336-353.
40.
MillerN.DollardJ. (1941). Social learning and imitation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
MullenB. (1983). Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 295-322.
42.
MullenB. (1986). Atrocity as a function of lynch mob composition: A self-attention perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 187-197.
43.
PerloffR. M. (2000). The press and lynchings of African Americans. Journal of Black Studies, 30, 315-330.
44.
PinkerS. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York, NY: Viking.
45.
PostmesT.SpearsR. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238-259.
46.
Prentice-DunnS.RogersR. W. (1989). Deindividuation and the self-regulation of behavior. In PaulusP. B. (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 87-109). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
ReedJ. S. (1972). Percent black and lynching: A test of Blalock’s theory. Social Forces, 50, 356-360.
48.
ReicherS. D. (1984). Social influence in the crowd: Attitudinal and behavioural effects of de-individuation in conditions of high and low group salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 341-350. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00650.x
49.
ReicherS. D.SpearsR.PostmesT. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 161-198).
50.
RyeB. J.GreatrixS. A.EnrightC. S. (2006). The case of the guilty victim: The effects of gender of victim and gender of perpetrator on attributions of blame and responsibility. Sex Roles, 54, 639-649.
51.
SchuurW. H. v. (2003). Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman Scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis, 11, 139-163.
52.
Senechal de la RocheR. (1996). Collective violence as social control. Sociological Forum, 11, 97-128.
53.
Senechal de la RocheR. (2001). Why is collective violence collective?Sociological Theory, 19, 126-144.
54.
SilkeA. (2003). Deindividuation, anonymity, and violence: Findings from northern Ireland. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 493-499.
55.
SmångsM. (2016). Doing violence, making race: Southern lynching and white racial group formation. American Journal of Sociology, 121, 1329-1374.
56.
SpearsR. (2014). Deindividuation. In HarkinsS. G.WilliamsK. D.BurgerJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social influence (p. 33). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
SuretteR. (2013). Cause or catalyst: The interaction of real world and media crime models. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 392-409.
58.
TolnayS. E.BeckE. M. (1995). A festival of violence: An analysis of Southern lynchings, 1882-1930. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
WatsonR. I. (1973). Investigation into deindividuation using a cross-cultural survey technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 342-345.
61.
ZhongC.-B.BohnsV. K.GinoF. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 311-314.
62.
ZimbardoP. G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 17, 237-307.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
