For almost 50 years, psychologists have been theorizing about and measuring religiosity essentially the way Gordon Allport did, when he distinguished between intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity. However, there is a historical debate regarding what this scale actually measures, which items should be included, and how many factors or subscales exist. To provide more definitive answers, we estimated a series of confirmatory factor analysis models comparing four competing theories for how to score Gorsuch and McPherson’s commonly used measure of intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity. We then formally investigated measurement invariance across U.S. Protestants, Irish Catholics, and Turkish Muslims and across U.S. Protestants, Catholics, and Muslims. We provide evidence that a five-item version of intrinsic religiosity is invariant across the U.S. samples and predicts less warmth toward atheists and gay men/lesbians, validating the scale. Our results suggest that a variation of Gorsuch and McPherson’s measure may be appropriate for some but not all uses in cross-cultural research.
AkaikeH. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
2.
AllportG. W.RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443.
3.
BentlerP. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
4.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
5.
BrewczynskiJ.MacDonaldD. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Allport and Ross Religious Orientation Scale with a Polish sample. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 16, 63-76.
6.
CohenA. B. (2002). The importance of spirituality in well-being for Jews and Christians. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 287-310.
7.
CohenA. B.GorvineB. J.GorvineH. (2013). The religion, spirituality, and psychology of Jews. In PargamentK. I. (Editor-in-Chief), ExlineJ. J.JonesJ. W. (Eds.), APA Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality: Vol. 1. Context, theory, and research (pp. 665-679). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
CohenA. B.HallD. E.KoenigH. G.MeadorK. G. (2005). Social versus individual motivation: Implications for normative definitions of religious orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 48-61.
9.
CohenA. B.HillP. C. (2007). Religion as culture: Religious individualism and collectivism among American Catholics, Jews, and Protestants. Journal of Personality, 75, 709-742.
10.
CohenA. B.SiegelJ. I.RozinP. (2003). Faith versus practice: Different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 287-295.
11.
CohenD. (2007). Methods in cultural psychology. In KitayamaS.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 196-236). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
DiStefanoC.MotlR. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 440-464.
14.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
16.
FlereS.LavricM. (2008). Is intrinsic religious orientation a culturally specific American Protestant concept? The fusion of intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation among non-Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 521-530.
17.
GervaisW. M.NorenzayanA. (2013). Religion and the origins of anti-atheist prejudice. In ClarkeS.PowellR.SavulescuJ. (Eds.), Religion, intolerance, and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation (pp. 126-145). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP. J.GhramalekiA. F.MorrisR. J.HoodR. W.Jr. (2002). Muslim-Christian Religious Orientation Scales: Distinctions, correlations, and cross-cultural analysis in Iran and the United States. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 12, 69-91.
19.
GorsuchR. L.McPhersonS. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-Revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348-354.
20.
GorsuchR. L.VenableG. D. (1983). Development of an “age-universal” I-E scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 181-187.
21.
HallD. L.MatzD. C.WoodW. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 126-139.
22.
HillP. C.HoodR. W.Jr. (Eds.). (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
23.
HillP. C.PargamentK. I. (2003). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: Implications for physical and mental health. American Psychologist, 58, 64-74.
24.
HornJ. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
25.
HunsbergerB.JacksonL. M. (2005). Religion, meaning, and prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 807-826.
26.
JiC.-H. C.IbrahimY. (2007). Islamic doctrinal orthodoxy and religious orientations: Scale development and validation. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 189-208.
27.
JohnsonK. A.CohenA. B. (2013). The relation between religious and national cultures. In SaroglouV. (Ed.), Religion, personality, and social behavior (pp. 338-360). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
JohnsonK. A.CohenA. B.OkunM. A. (2016). God is watching . . . but also watching over you: The influence of benevolent God representations on secular volunteerism among Christians. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8, 363-374.
29.
KhanZ. H.WatsonP. J.ChenZ. (2015). Meanings of animal sacrifice during Eid-ul-Adha: Relationships with religious orientations and Muslim experiential religiousness in Pakistan. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 37, 37-53.
30.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1989). A psychometric analysis of the Allport-Ross and Feagin measures of intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation. In LynnM. L.MobergD. O. (Eds.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (Vol. 1, pp. 1-31). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
31.
KirkpatrickL. A.HoodR. W.Jr. (1990). Intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation: The boon or bane of contemporary psychology of religion?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 442-462.
32.
KoenigH. G.BüssingA. (2010). The Duke Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions, 1, 78-85.
33.
LindwallM.BarkoukisV.GranoC.LucidiF.RaudseppL.LiukkonenJ.Thøgersen-NtoumaniC. (2012). Method effects: The problem with negatively versus positively keyed items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 196-204.
34.
MaltbyJ. (1999). The internal structure of a derived, revised, and amended measure of the Religious Orientation Scale: The “Age Universal” I-E Scale-12. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 407-412.
35.
MillsapR. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. London, England: Routledge.
36.
MomtazY. A.HamidT. A.YahayaN.IbrahimR. (2010). Religiosity among older Muslim Malaysians: Gender perspective. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 5, 210-220.
37.
PargamentK. I. (1992). Of means and ends: Religion and the search for significance. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 201-229.
38.
PasekM. H.CookJ. E. (under review). Religion from the target’s perspective: A portrait of religious threat and its consequences in the United States.
39.
RowattW. C.Johnson ShenM.LaBouffJ. P.GonzalezA. (2013). Religious fundamentalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and prejudice: Insights from meta-analyses, implicit social cognition, and social neuroscience. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 457-475). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
SaroglouV.CohenA. B. (2011). Psychology of culture and religion: Introduction to the JCCP special issue. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 1309-1319.
41.
SaroglouV.CohenA. B. (2013). Cultural and cross-cultural psychology of religion. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. F. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology and religion and spirituality (2nd ed., pp. 330-354). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
42.
SaroglouV.DelpierreV.DernelleR. (2004). Values and religiosity: A meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 721-734.
43.
SaroglouV.Muñoz-GarcíaA. (2008). Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue of personality traits and/or values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 83-101.
44.
SatorraA. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In HeijmansR. D. H.PollockD. S. G.SatorraA. (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis (pp. 233-247). London, England: Kluwer Academic.
45.
SchwarzG. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
46.
ScloveS. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343.
47.
SilvermanG.JohnsonK. A.CohenA. B. (2016). To believe or not to believe, that is not the question: The complexity of Jewish beliefs about God. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8, 119-130.
48.
SmitherJ. W.WalkerA. G. (2015). The relationship between core self-evaluations, views of God, and intrinsic/extrinsic religious motivation. Psychological Reports: Sociocultural Issues in Psychology, 116, 647-662.
49.
SteenkampJ.-B. E. M.BaumgartnerH. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.
50.
SteigerJ. H. (1989). EzPATH: A supplementary module for SYSTAT and SYGRAPH. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.
51.
TrimbleD. E. (1997). The Religious Orientation Scale: Review and meta-analysis of social desirability effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 970-986.
52.
TuckerL. R.LewisC. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
53.
van ProoijenJ.van der KlootW. A. (2001). Confirmatory analysis of exploratively obtained factor structures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 777-792.
54.
VelicerW. F.JacksonD. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1-28.
55.
WarnerC. M.KilincR.HaleC. W.CohenA. B.JohnsonK. A. (2015). Religion and public goods provision: Experimental and interview evidence from Catholicism and Islam in Europe. Comparative Politics, 47, 189-209.
56.
WestS. G.TaylorA. B.WuW. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209-231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
57.
WhitleyB. E. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 21-38.
58.
WorthingtonE. L.Jr.WadeN. G.HightT. L.RipleyJ. S.McCulloughM. E.BerryJ. W.. . . BursleyK. H. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 84-96.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
