Three studies examined the relationship between people’s moral values (drawing on moral foundations theory) and their willingness to censor immoral acts from children. Results revealed that diverse moral values did not predict censorship judgments. It was not the case that participants who valued loyalty and authority, respectively, sought to censor depictions of disloyal and disobedient acts. Rather, censorship intentions were predicted by a single moral value—sanctity. The more people valued sanctity, the more willing they were to censor from children, regardless of the types of violations depicted (impurity, disloyalty, disobedience, etc.). Furthermore, people who valued sanctity objected to indecent exposure only to apparently innocent and pure children—those who were relatively young and who had not been previously exposed to immoral acts. These data suggest that sanctity, purity, and the preservation of innocence underlie intentions to censor from young children.
AltemeyerR. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
2.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12, 353-359.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BuckelsE. E.BeallA. T.HoferM. K.LinE. Y.ZhouZ.SchallerM. (2015). Individual differences in activation of the parental care motivational system: Assessment, prediction, and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 497-514.
5.
BushmanB. J.AndersonC. A. (2001). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56, 477-489.
6.
CiprianiD. (2009). Children’s rights and the minimum age of criminal responsibility. Abingdon, UK: Ashgate.
7.
CohenA. B. (2003). Religion, likelihood of action, and the morality of mentality. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 13, 273-285.
8.
CohenA. B.RozinP. (2001). Religion and the morality of mentality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 697-710.
9.
CurtisV.BiranA. (2001). Dirt, disgust, and disease: Is hygiene in our genes?Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44, 17-31.
10.
CushmanF. A. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353-380.
11.
DawsonS. L.TysonG. A. (2012). Will morality or political ideology determine attitudes to climate change?Australian Community Psychologist, 24(2), 8-25.
12.
EibachR. P.LibbyL. K.EhrlingerJ. (2009). Priming family values: How being a parent affects moral evaluations of harmless but offensive acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1160-1163.
13.
EibachR. P.MockS. E. (2011). The vigilant parent: Parental role salience affects parents’ risk perceptions, risk-aversion, and trust in strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 694-697.
14.
FesslerD. T.EngS. J.NavarreteC. D. (2005). Elevated disgust sensitivity in the first trimester of pregnancy: Evidence supporting the compensatory prophylaxis hypothesis. Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 344-351.
15.
GinoF.DesaiS. D. (2012). Memory lane and morality: How childhood memories promote prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 743-758.
16.
GoffP.JacksonM.Di LeoneB.CulottaC.DiTomassoN. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 526-545.
17.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213-224.
18.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS.DittoP. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55-130.
19.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
20.
GrahamJ.NosekB. A.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366-385.
21.
HaidtJ.GrahamJ. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
22.
HaidtJ.McCauleyC.RozinP. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701-713.
23.
HelzerE. G.PizarroD. A. (2011). Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22, 517-522.
24.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.BloomP. (2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 714-725.
KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.NeubergS. L.SchallerM. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292-314.
27.
KenrickD. T.NeubergS. L.GriskeviciusV.BeckerD. V.SchallerM. (2010). Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior: The fundamental-motives framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 63-67.
28.
NavarreteC. D.FesslerD. M.EngS. J. (2007). Elevated ethnocentrism in the first trimester of pregnancy. Evolution & Human Behavior, 28, 60-65.
29.
NittonoH.FukushimaM.YanoA.MoriyaH. (2012). The power of Kawaii: Viewing cute images promotes a careful behavior and narrows attentional focus. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e46362. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046362
OatenM.StevensonR. J.CaseT. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303-321.
32.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
33.
RozinP.NemeroffC. (2002). Sympathetic magical thinking: The contagion and similarity “heuristics.” In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 201-216). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
SimonA. K.HollanderG. A.McMichaelA. (2015). Evolution of the immune system in humans from infancy to old age. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1821), 20143085.
37.
SivulkaJ. (2001). Stronger than dirt: A cultural history of advertising personal hygiene in America, 1875 to 1940. New York, NY: Humanity Books.
38.
Van LeeuwenF.ParkJ. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 169-173.
39.
WinegardB.DeanerR. O. (2010). The evolutionary significance of Red Sox Nation: Sport fandom as a by-product of coalitional psychology. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 432-446.
40.
WoodrowC. (1999). Revisiting images of the child in early childhood education: Reflections and considerations. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 24, 7-13.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
