Facial appearance correlates with leadership, both in terms of who is chosen (leader selection) and how they do (leader success). Leadership theories suggest that exceptional individuals acquire positions as leaders. Exceptional traits can differ between domains, however, and so the qualities valued in leaders in one occupation may not match those valued among leaders in another. To test this, we compared the relationship between facial appearance and leadership across two domains: law firms and mafia families. Perceptions of power correlated with leadership among law executives whereas social skill correlated with leadership in organized crime. Critically, these traits were distinctive within their respective groups. Furthermore, an experimental test showed that the relative frequency of facial traits in a group can render them either an asset or liability. Perceived leadership ability is therefore enhanced by characteristics that appear unique among individuals who satisfy the basic criteria for their group.
ArmstrongJ. S.GreenK. C.JonesR. J.WrightM. J. (2010). Predicting elections from politicians’ faces. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 511-522.
4.
BerryD. S.McArthurL. Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.
5.
BlakerN. M.RompaI.DessingI. H.VriendA. F.HerschbergC.van VugtM. (2013). The height leadership advantage in men and women: Testing evolutionary psychology predictions about the perceptions of tall leaders. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 17-27.
6.
BlondelJ. (1987). Political leadership: Towards a general analysis. London, England: SAGE.
7.
BoothroydL. G.JonesB. C.BurtD. M.CornwellR. E.LittleA. C.TiddemanB. P.. . . PerrettD. I. (2005). Facial masculinity is related to perceived age but not perceived health. Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 417-431.
8.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2651-2656.
9.
CollinsM. A.ZebrowitzL. A. (1995). The contributions of appearance to occupational outcomes in civilian and military settings1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 129-163.
10.
CowleyW. H. (1931). The traits of face-to-face leaders. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26, 304-313.
11.
DayD. V.LordR. G. (1988). Executive leadership and organizational performance: Suggestions for a new theory and methodology. Journal of Management, 14, 453-464.
12.
DeBruineL. M.JonesB. C.LittleA. C.BoothroydL. G.PerrettD. I.Penton-VoakI. S.. . . TiddemanB. P. (2006). Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner’s masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273, 1355-1360.
13.
DeBruineL. M.JonesB. C.UngerL.LittleA. C.FeinbergD. R. (2007). Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1420-1430.
14.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
15.
GalanterM.PalayT. (1991). Tournament of lawyers: The transformation of the big law firm. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
GeeE. G.JacksonD. W. (1977). Bridging the gap: Legal education and lawyer competency. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1977, 695-990.
JacobsJ. B.GouldinL. P. (1999). Cosa Nostra: The final chapter?Crime and Justice, 25, 129-189.
19.
JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.MainJ. C.LittleA. C.WellingL. L.FeinbergD. R.. . . TiddemanB. P. (2010). Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 617-624.
20.
JungD. I.AvolioB. J. (1999). Effects of leadership style and followers’ cultural orientation on performance in group and individual task conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 208-218.
21.
KaiserR. B.HoganR.CraigS. B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist, 63, 96-110.
22.
LangloisJ. H.RoggmanL. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115-121.
23.
LawsonC.LenzG. S.BakerA.MyersM. (2010). Looking like a winner: Candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies. World Politics, 62, 561-593.
24.
LittleA. C. (2014). Facial appearance and leader choice in different contexts: Evidence for task contingent selection based on implicit and learned face-behaviour/face-ability associations. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 865-874.
25.
LittleA. C.BurrissR. P.JonesB. C.RobertsS. C. (2007). Facial appearance affects voting decisions. Evolution & Human Behavior, 28, 18-27.
26.
LivingstonR. W.PearceN. A. (2009). The teddy-bear effect: Does having a baby face benefit Black chief executive officers?Psychological Science, 20, 1229-1236.
27.
LoehrJ.O’HaraR. B. (2013). Facial morphology predicts male fitness and rank but not survival in Second World War Finnish soldiers. Biology Letters, 9, 20130049.
28.
LordR. G.BrownD. J.HarveyJ. L.HallR. J. (2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 311-338.
29.
MartinD. S. (1978). Person perception and real-life electoral behaviour. Australian Journal of Psychology, 30, 255-262.
30.
MazurA.MazurJ.KeatingC. (1984). Military rank attainment of a West Point class: Effects of cadets’ physical features. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 125-150.
31.
McArthurL. Z.BaronR. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
MillsC. W. (1999). The power elite. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
MonteleoneV. J. (1949). The vernacular of the underworld lingo. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange.
35.
MooreD. W.TroutB. T. (1978). Military advancement: the visibility theory of promotion. American Political Science Review, 72(2), 452-468.
36.
MuellerU.MazurA. (1996). Facial dominance of West Point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces, 74, 823-850.
37.
MurrayG. R.SchmitzJ. D. (2011). Caveman politics: Evolutionary leadership preferences and physical stature. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 1215-1235.
38.
OlivolaC. Y.EubanksD. L.LovelaceJ. B. (2014). The many (distinctive)faces of leadership: Inferring leadership domain from facial appearance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 817-834.
39.
PerrettD. I.LeeK. J.Penton-VoakI.RowlandD.YoshikawaS.BurtD. M.. . . AkamatsuS. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-887.
40.
PillemerJ.GrahamE. R.BurkeD. M. (2014). The face says it all: CEOs, gender, and predicting corporate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 855-864.
41.
RaabS. (2006). Five families: The rise, decline, and resurgence of America’s most powerful Mafia empires. London, England: Macmillan.
ReD. E.DeBruineL. M.JonesB. C.PerrettD. I. (2013). Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 89-103.
44.
ReD. E.RuleN. O. (2015). Appearance and physiognomy. In MatsumotoD.HwangH.FrankM. (Eds.), APA Handbook of 4 Nonverbal Communication (pp. 221–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45.
ReD. E.RuleN. O. (2016). The big man has a big mouth: Mouth width correlates with perceived leadership ability and actual leadership performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 86-93.
46.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Jr.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363.
47.
RiggioH. R.RiggioR. E. (2010). Appearance-based trait inferences and voting: Evolutionary roots and implications for leadership. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 119-125.
48.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2008). The face of success inferences from chief executive officers’ appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19, 109-111.
49.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2009). She’s got the look: Inferences from female chief executive officers’ faces predict their success. Sex Roles, 61, 644-652.
50.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2010). First impressions of the face: Predicting success. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 506-516.
51.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2011a). Face and fortune: Inferences of personality from managing partners’ faces predict their law firms’ financial success. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 690-696.
52.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2011b). Judgments of power from college yearbook photos and later career success. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 154-158.
53.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B.Jr.OzonoH.NakashimaS.YoshikawaS.. . . WatabeM. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 1-15.
54.
SeniorC.MartinR.ThomasG.TopakasA.WestM.YeatsR. M. (2012). Developmental stability and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 281-291.
55.
SpisakB. R.DekkerP. H.KrügerM.van VugtM. (2012). Warriors and peacekeepers: Testing a biosocial implicit leadership hypothesis of intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces. PLoS ONE, 7, e30399.
56.
SpisakB. R.HomanA. C.GraboA.van VugtM. (2012). Facing the situation: Testing a biosocial contingency model of leadership in intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 273-280.
57.
TodorovA.MandisodzaA. N.GorenA.HallC. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623-1626.
58.
van VugtM.GraboA. E. (2015). The many faces of leadership: An evolutionary psychology approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 484-489.
59.
van VugtM.HoganR.KaiserR. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182-196.
60.
WongE. M.OrmistonM. E.HaselhuhnM. P. (2011). A face only an investor could love: CEOs’ facial structure predicts their firms’ financial performance. Psychological Science, 22, 1478-1483.
61.
ZaccaroS. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 6-16.
62.
ZebrowitzL. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul?Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
