The current research utilized ecological momentary assessment methodology to examine affective responses to interacting with close versus distant interaction partners during naturally occurring social interactions, and to test predictions regarding the mediating roles of perceived social approval and authenticity. Analysis of 4,602 social interactions reported by 176 participants suggested that, relative to interactions with distant partners, interactions with close partners were characterized by more positive affect. This effect was mediated by perceived social approval and authenticity. These findings suggest that social interactions with close others confer greater hedonic benefits relative to interactions with distant partners due to greater confidence in social approval and feelings of authenticity. Exploratory analyses suggested that interactions with close partners featured warmer and less shy behavior, and that participants who placed more importance on close relationships (as measured by high relational-interdependent self-construal) experienced more approval and authenticity in their interactions, particularly with distant partners.
AltmanI.TaylorD. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Oxford, UK: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2.
AntonucciT. C.AkiyamaH.LansfordJ. E. (1998). Negative effects of close social relations. Family Relations, 47, 379-384.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
4.
AronA. P.MashekD. J.AronE. N. (2004). Closeness as including other in the self. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 27-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
AsendorpfJ. B. (1989). Shyness as a final common pathway for two different kinds of inhibition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 481-492.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.JonesE. E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target’s knowledge: Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 608-618.
7.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
8.
BerryD. S.HansenJ. S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 796-809.
9.
BerscheidE.AmmazzalorsoH. (2001). Emotional experience in close relationships. In FletcherG. J.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 308-330). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
10.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579-616.
11.
BraikerH. B.KelleyH. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In BurgessR. L.HustonT. L. (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135-168). New York, NY: Academic Press.
12.
BrownL. H.SilviaP. J.Myin-GermeysI.KwapilT. R. (2007). When the need to belong goes wrong: The expression of social anhedonia and social anxiety in daily life. Psychological Science, 18, 778-782.
13.
BussD. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616-628. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616
14.
CarvalloM.PelhamB. W. (2006). When fiends become friends: The need to belong and perceptions of personal and group discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 94-108.
15.
ChaikinA. L.DerlegaV. J. (1974). Variables affecting the appropriateness of self-disclosure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 588-593.
16.
ChaudoirS. R.FisherJ. D. (2010). The disclosure processes model: Understanding disclosure decision making and postdisclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 236-256.
17.
ClarkM. S.LemayE. P.Jr. (2010). Close relationships. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 898-940). New York, NY: John Wiley.
18.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. R. (2011). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In LangeP. A. M. V.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 232-250). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
19.
ConnellyB. S.OnesD. S. (2010). An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092-1122. doi:10.1037/a0021212
20.
CrossS. E.BaconP. L.MorrisM. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
21.
CrossS. E.MorrisM. L. (2003). Getting to know you: The relational self-construal, relational cognition, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 512-523.
22.
DePauloB. M.KashyD. A. (1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 63-79.
23.
DienerE.ColvinC. R.PavotW. G.AllmanA. (1991). The psychic costs of intense positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 492-503.
24.
DittesJ. E.KelleyH. H. (1956). Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 100-107.
25.
DunnE. W.BiesanzJ. C.HumanL. J.FinnS. (2007). Misunderstanding the affective consequences of everyday social interactions: The hidden benefits of putting one’s best face forward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 990-1005.
26.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121-138.
27.
EnglishT.JohnO. P. (2013). Understanding the social effects of emotion regulation: The mediating role of authenticity for individual differences in suppression. Emotion, 13, 314-329.
28.
ErberR.ErberM. W. (2000). The self-regulation of moods: Second thoughts on the importance of happiness in everyday life. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 142-148.
29.
ErberR.WegnerD. M.TherriaultN. (1996). On being cool and collected: Mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 757-766.
30.
FinkelE. J.CampbellW. K.BrunellA. B.DaltonA. N.ScarbeckS. J.ChartrandT. L. (2006). High-maintenance interaction: Inefficient social coordination impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 456-475.
31.
FleesonW.WiltJ. (2010). The relevance of big five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement?Journal of Personality, 78, 1353-1382.
32.
FletcherG. J.KerrP. S. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627-658. doi:10.1037/a0019792
33.
FunderD. C.ColvinC. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.
34.
FunderD. C.KolarD. C.BlackmanM. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656-672.
35.
GillathO.SeskoA. K.ShaverP. R.ChunD. S. (2010). Attachment, authenticity, and honesty: Dispositional and experimentally induced security can reduce self- and other-deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 841-855.
36.
GoldmanB. M.KernisM. H. (2002). The role of authenticity in healthy psychological functioning and subjective well-being. Annals of the American Psychotherapy Association, 5, 18-20.
37.
GoreJ. S.CrossS. E.MorrisM. L. (2006). Let’s be friends: Relational self-construal and the development of intimacy. Personal Relationships, 13, 83-102.
38.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.SundieJ. M.CialdiniR. B.MillerG. F.KenrickD. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85-102.
39.
GrossJ. J.JohnO. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.
40.
Jongman-SerenoK. P.LearyM. R. (2016). Self-perceived authenticity is contaminated by the valence of one’s behavior. Self and Identity, 15, 283-301.
41.
KashdanT. B.StegerM. F. (2006). Expanding the topography of social anxiety: An experience-sampling assessment of positive emotions, positive events, and emotion suppression. Psychological Science, 17, 120-128.
42.
KwangT.SwannW. B.Jr. (2010). Do people embrace praise even when they feel unworthy? A review of critical tests of self-enhancement versus self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 263-280. doi:10.1177/1088868310365876
43.
LeB.AgnewC. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37-57.
44.
LearyM. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 221-229.
45.
LearyM. R.AllenA. B.TerryM. L. (2011). Managing social images in naturalistic versus laboratory settings: Implications for understanding and studying self-presentation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 411-421.
46.
LearyM. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1-62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47.
LearyM. R.KowalskiR. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
48.
LearyM. R.NezlekJ. B.DownsD.Radford-DavenportJ.MartinJ.McMullenA. (1994). Self-presentation in everyday interactions: Effects of target familiarity and gender composition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 664-673.
49.
LentonA. P.SlabuL.SedikidesC.PowerK. (2013). I feel good, therefore I am real: Testing the causal influence of mood on state authenticity. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1202-1224.
50.
MattinglyB. A.OswaldD. L.ClarkE. M. (2011). An examination of relational-interdependent self-construal, communal strength, and pro-relationship behaviors in friendships. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1243-1248.
51.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53-152). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
52.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641-666.
53.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
54.
NezlekJ. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 771-785.
55.
OmarzuJ. (2000). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 174-185.
56.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD. J.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS.HayD. F.HobfollS. E.IckesW.MontgomeryB. M. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 367-389). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
58.
ReisH. T.SheldonK. M.GableS. L.RoscoeJ.RyanR. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419-435.
59.
RogersC. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
60.
RookK. S. (2015). Social networks in later life: Weighing positive and negative effects on health and well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 45-51.
61.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
62.
SandstromG. M.DunnE. W. (2014). Social interactions and well-being: The surprising power of weak ties. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 910-922.
63.
ScherbaumC. A.FerreterJ. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347-367.
64.
SchimmackU.DienerE. (1997). Affect intensity: Separating intensity and frequency in repeatedly measured affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1313-1329.
65.
SchlenkerB. R. (1975). Self-presentation: Managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1030-1037.
66.
SchlenkerB. R.LearyM. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641-669.
67.
SelyaA. S.RoseJ. S.DierkerL. C.HedekerD.MermelsteinR. J. (2012). A practical guide to calculating Cohen’s f2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 111.
68.
SheldonK. M.RyanR.ReisH. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270-1279.
69.
ShiffmanS.StoneA. A.HuffordM. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1-32.
70.
StinsonL.IckesW. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 787-797.
71.
SwannW. B.Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In SulsJ.GreenwaldA. G. (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72.
ThomasG.FletcherG. J. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1079-1094.
73.
TiceD. M.ButlerJ. L.MuravenM. B.StillwellA. M. (1995). When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1120-1138. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1120
74.
Van LangeP. A.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. B.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1373-1395.
75.
VittenglJ. R.HoltC. S. (1998). Positive and negative affect in social interactions as a function of partner familiarity, quality of communication, and social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 196-208.
76.
WatsonD. (1988). Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: Their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1020-1030.
77.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
78.
WilliamsK. D.CheungC. K.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762.
79.
ZimbardoP.PilkonisP.NorwoodR. (1977). The silent prison of shyness (DTIC Document No. AD-A101822). Stanford, CA: Office of Naval Research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
