Research has demonstrated the contribution of sexual activity to the quality of ongoing relationships. Nevertheless, less attention has been given to how activation of the sexual system affects relationship-initiation processes. Three studies used complementary methodologies to examine the effect of sexual priming on self-disclosure, a relationship-promoting behavior. In Study 1, participants were subliminally exposed to sexual stimuli (vs. neutral stimuli), and then disclosed over Instant Messenger a personal event to an opposite-sex stranger. Results showed that merely thinking about sex, even without being aware of it, encouraged self-disclosure. Study 2 replicated these findings in relatively naturalistic conditions (live face-to-face interactions following supraliminal video priming). Study 3 extended these findings, indicating that sexual priming facilitated self-disclosure, which, in turn, increased interest in future interactions with the stranger. Together, these findings suggest that activation of the sexual system encourages the use of strategies that allow people to become closer to potential partners.
AcevedoB. P.AronA. P. (2014). Romantic love, pair-bonding, and the dopaminergic reward system. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 55-69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14250-004
2.
ArielyD.LoewensteinG. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87-98. doi:10.1002/bdm.501
3.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
4.
BergJ. H.DerlegaV. J. (1987). Themes in the study of self-disclosure. In DerlegaV. J.BergJ. H. (Eds.), Self-disclosure (pp. 1-8). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
5.
BerscheidE.ReisH. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 193-281). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
6.
BethlehemR. A. I.van HonkJ.AuyeungB.Baron-CohenS. (2013). Oxytocin, brain physiology, and functional connectivity: A review of intranasal oxytocin fMRI studies. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 962-974. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.10.011
7.
BirnbaumG. E. (2003). The meaning of heterosexual intercourse among women with female orgasmic disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32, 61-71. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12597273
8.
BirnbaumG. E. (2014). Sexy building blocks: The contribution of the sexual system to attachment formation and maintenance. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 315-332). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14250-018
9.
BirnbaumG. E. (2016). Attachment and sexual mating: The joint operation of separate motivational systems. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment, third edition: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 464-483). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
BirnbaumG. E.Ein-DorT.ReisH. T.SegalN. (2014). Why do men prefer nice women? Gender typicality mediates the effect of responsiveness on perceived attractiveness in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1341-1353. doi:10.1177/0146167214543879
11.
BirnbaumG. E.FinkelE. J. (2015). The magnetism that holds us together: Sexuality and relationship maintenance across relationship development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 29-33. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.11.009
12.
BirnbaumG. E.GillathO. (2006). Measuring subgoals of the sexual behavioral system: What is sex good for?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 675-701. doi:10.1177/0265407506065992
13.
BirnbaumG. E.Laser-BrandtD. (2002). Gender differences in the experience of heterosexual intercourse. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 143-158.
14.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T. (2006). Women’s sexual working models: An evolutionary-attachment perspective. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 328-342. doi:10.1080/00224490609552332
15.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 946-958. doi:10.1177/0146167212441028
16.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T.MikulincerM.GillathO.OrpazA. (2006). When sex is more than just sex: Attachment orientations, sexual experience, and relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 929-943. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.929
17.
Bleske-RechekA. L.BussD. M. (2001). Opposite-sex friendship: Sex differences and similarities in initiation, selection, and dissolution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1310-1323. doi:10.1177/01461672012710007
18.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550-558.
19.
BussD. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616-628. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3367282
20.
BussD. M.KenrickD. T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 982-1026). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21.
CacioppoS.CacioppoJ. T. (2013). Lust for life. Scientific American Mind, 24(5), 56-60. doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1113-56
22.
CarterC. S. (1992). Oxytocin and sexual behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 16, 131-144. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(05)80176-9
23.
CarterC. S. (2014). Oxytocin pathways and the evolution of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 17-39. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115110
24.
CollinsN. L.MillerL. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457-475. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7809308
25.
DiamondL. M.DickensonJ. (2012). The neuroimaging of love and desire: Review and future directions. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 9, 39-46.
26.
DindiaK. (2002). Self-disclosure research: Knowledge through meta-analysis. In AllenM.PreissR. W.GayleB. M.BurrellN. (Eds.), Interpersonal communication: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 69-86). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
DitzenB.SchaerM.GabrielB.BodenmannG.EhlertU.HeinrichsM. (2009). Intranasal oxytocin increases positive communication and reduces cortisol levels during couple conflict. Biological Psychiatry, 65, 728-731. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.011
28.
EastwickP. W. (2009). Beyond the pleistocene: Using phylogeny and constraint to inform the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 794-821. doi:10.1037/a0016845
29.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160.
30.
FehrB. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interaction-pattern model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 265-284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.265
31.
FisherH. E. (1998). Lust, attraction, and attachment in mammalian reproduction. Human Nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 9, 23-52. doi:10.1007/s12110-998-1010-5
32.
FordC. S.BeachF. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
33.
GillathO.MikulincerM.BirnbaumG. E.ShaverP. R. (2007). Does subliminal exposure to sexual stimuli have the same effects on men and women?Journal of Sex Research, 44, 111-121. doi:10.1080/00224490701263579
34.
GillathO.MikulincerM.BirnbaumG. E.ShaverP. R. (2008). When sex primes love: Subliminal sexual priming motivates relationship goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1057-1069. doi:10.1177/0146167208318141
35.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
36.
HazanC.ZeifmanD. (1994). Sex and the psychological tether. In BartholomewK.PerlmanD. (Eds.), Advances in Personal Relationships: Vol. 5. Attachment processes in adulthood (pp. 151-177). London, England: Jessica Kingsley.
37.
JourardS. M. (1959). Self-disclosure and other-cathexis. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 428-431. doi:10.1037/h0041640
38.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54-69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
39.
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9599440
40.
LitzingerS.GordonK. C. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31, 409-424. doi:10.1080/00926230591006719
41.
MacKinnonD. P.KrullJ. L.LockwoodC. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
42.
MestonC. M.BussD. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477-507. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2
43.
MikulincerM.NachshonO. (1991). Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 321-331. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.321
44.
MurphyM. R.SecklJ. R.BurtonS.CheckleyS. A.LightmanS. L. (1987). Changes in oxytocin and vasopressin secretion during sexual activity in men. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 65, 738-741. doi:10.1210/jcem-65-4-738
45.
ReinischJ. M.BeasleyR. (1991). The Kinsey Institute new report on sex. London, England: Penguin.
46.
ReisH. T.GableS. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190-222). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS.HayD. F.HobfollS. E.IckesW.MontgomeryB. M. (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions (pp. 367-389). Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
48.
RichardF. D.BondC. F.Jr.Stokes-ZootaJ. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
49.
RubinH.CampbellL. (2012). Day-to-day changes in intimacy predict heightened relationship passion, sexual occurrence, and sexual satisfaction: A dyadic diary analysis. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 3, 224-231. doi:10.1177/1948550611416520
50.
RussellV. M.McNultyJ. K. (2011). Frequent sex protects intimates from the negative implications of their neuroticism. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 2, 220-227. doi:10.1177/1948550610387162
51.
SheldonP. (2009). “I’ll poke you. You’ll poke me!” Self-disclosure, social attraction, predictability and trust as important predictors of Facebook relationships. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(2), Article 1.
52.
TidwellL. C.WaltherJ. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research, 28, 317-348. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x
53.
WeingartenE.ChenQ.McAdamsM.YiJ.HelperJ.AlbarracínD. (2016). From primed concepts to action: A meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally presented words. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 472-497. doi:10.1037/bul0000030
54.
WellsG. L.WindschitlP. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125. doi:10.1177/01461672992512005
55.
YoungK. A.LiuY.GobroggeK. L.WangH.WangZ. (2014). Oxytocin reverses amphetamine-induced deficits in social bonding: Evidence for an interaction with nucleus accumbens dopamine. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 34, 8499-8506. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4275-13.2014
56.
YoungL. J.WangZ. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1048-1054. doi:10.1038/nn1327
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
