Relational authenticity—which refers to subjective feelings of authenticity in a specific relationship—confers well-being; yet little is known about what gives rise to it. The present research tested competing hypotheses about the basis of relational authenticity, whether it arises from being one’s actual self in a relationship (actual–relational selves overlap), ideal self (relational–ideal selves overlap), or both. A pilot study examined lay beliefs about the basis of relational authenticity. Study 1 then showed that relational–ideal, but not actual–relational, overlap predicts relational authenticity. The remaining studies experimentally manipulated relational–ideal overlap, and showed that low overlap reduced relational authenticity compared with a control condition (Study 2), with varying actual–relational overlap (Study 3), and with varying actual–ideal overlap (Study 4). Several alternative accounts (e.g., negative general relationship perceptions) were addressed. We conclude that relational authenticity emanates largely from being one’s ideal self in the relevant relationship, and discuss implications and future directions.
AndersenS. M.ChenS. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619-645.
2.
AronA.AronE. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. New York: Hemisphere Publishing.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
4.
BaldwinM. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484.
5.
BrewerM. B.GardnerW. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
6.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5.
7.
CampbellW. K.SedikidesC.BossonJ. (1994). Romantic involvement, self-discrepancy, and psychological well-being: A preliminary investigation. Personal Relationships, 1, 399-404.
8.
ChandlerJ.MuellerP.PaolacciG. (2014). Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 112-130.
9.
ChenS.AndersenS. M. (1999). Relationships from the past in the present: Significant-other representations and transference in interpersonal life. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 123-190). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
ChenS.BoucherH.KrausM. W. (2011). The relational self. In SchwartzS. J.LuyckxK.VignolesV. L. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 149-175). New York, NY: Springer.
11.
ChenS.BoucherH. C.AndersenS. M.SaribayS. A. (2013). Transference and the relational self. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), Handbook of close relationships (pp. 281-305). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
ChenS.BoucherH. C.TapiasM. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 151-179.
13.
ChenS.FitzsimonsG. M.AndersenS. M. (2006). Automaticity and close relationships. In BarghJ. A. (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 133-172). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
14.
CrossS. E.BaconP. L.MorrisM. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
16.
DrigotasS. M.RusbultC. E.WieselquistJ.WhittonS. W. (1999). Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 293-323.
17.
EnglishT.JohnO. (2013). Understanding the social effects of emotion regulation: The mediating role of authenticity for individual differences in suppression. Emotion, 13, 314-329.
18.
FleesonW.WiltJ. (2010). The relevance of Big Five trait Content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement?Journal of Personality, 78, 1353-1382.
19.
HarterS. (2002). Authenticity. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 382-394). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
21.
ImpettE. A.SorsoliL.SchoolerD.HensonJ. M.TolmanD. L. (2008). Girls’ relationship authenticity and self-esteem across adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 44, 722-733.
22.
JamesW. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
23.
KernisM. H.GoldmanB. M. (2005). Authenticity: A multicomponent perspective. In TesserA.WoodJ.StapelD. (Eds.), On building, defending, and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 31-52). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
24.
KernisM. H.GoldmanB. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-357.
25.
KlohnenE. C.WellerJ. A.LuoS.ChoeM. (2005). Organization and predictive power of general and relationship-specific attachment models: One for all, and all for one?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1665-1682.
26.
LinardatosL.LydonJ. E. (2011). Relationship-specific identification and spontaneous relationship maintenance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 737-753.
27.
LopezF. G.RiceK. G. (2006). Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 362-371.
28.
MarkusH.CrossS. (1990). The interpersonal self. In PervinL. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 576-608). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
MarkusH.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
30.
MarkusH.WurfE. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
31.
MaslowA. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York, NY: John Wiley.
32.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.FriesenM. D. (2003). Mapping the intimate relationship mind: Comparisons between three models of attachment representations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1479-1493.
33.
RogersC. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
34.
RosenbergM. (1973). Which significant others?American Behavioral Scientist, 16, 829-860.
35.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-387.
36.
SheldonK. M.RyanR. M.RawsthorneL. J.IlardiB. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the big-five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380-1393.
37.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2013, January17-19). Life after P-Hacking. Paper presented at the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA.
38.
SwannW. B.Jr. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self, 2, 33-66.
39.
SwannW. B.Jr. (1990). To be adored or to be known: The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 408-448). New York: Guilford.
40.
SwannW. B.Jr.BossonJ. K.PelhamB. W. (2002). Different partners, different selves: The verification of circumscribed identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1215-1228.
41.
SwannW. B.Jr.De La RondeC.HixonJ. G. (1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings in marriage and courtship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 857-869.
42.
TheranS. A. (2011). Authenticity in relationships and depressive symptoms: A gender analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 423-428.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
