We introduce the distinction between perceiving the group as Intra-Generational (IG; including only the present generation of group members) and Trans-Generational (TG; including all past, present, and future generations of the group). In four studies (N = 1,265) administered to Jewish Israeli, Palestinian Israeli, American, and Swedish samples, we demonstrate that a tendency to perceive the group as TG is related to willingness to endure ingroup suffering and that this relationship is mediated by the degree to which the interest of the group as a whole is given primacy over the interest of the group as a collection of group members (Primacy of Interest). Furthermore, experimentally raising the salience of the group as TG leads to increased willingness to endure ingroup suffering as compared with raising the salience of the group as IG, and the effect of the TG salience manipulation is mediated by Primacy of Interest.
AndersonB. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London, England: Verso.
2.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2012). Amos (Version 21.0) [Computer program]. Chicago, IL: IBM SPSS.
3.
Bar-TalD.Chernyak-HaiL.SchoriN.GundarA. (2009). A sense of self perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91, 229-258.
4.
Ben-AmosA.Bet-ElI. (2005). Commemoration and national identity: Memorial ceremonies in Israeli schools. In LeviA.WeingrodA. (Eds.), Homelands and diasporas: Holy lands and other places (pp. 169-199). Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BrewerM. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
6.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3-5.
CondorS. (1996). Social identity and time. In RobinsonW. P. (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 287-365). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
9.
DruckmanD. (1994). Nationalism, patriotism and group loyalty: A social psychological perspective. Mershon International Studies Review, 38, 43-68.
10.
ElkinZ. (2011, October22). Happiness for a day? A tragedy for generations!Likudnik. Available from http://www.likudnik.co.il/
11.
GeffenA. (2008). Hayeled shel kulanu [Everybody’s child]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Helicon Records.
12.
GreenbergJ.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 61-139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451-470.
15.
HobsbawmE. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HobsbawmE.RangerT. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HofferE. (1951). The true believer. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
18.
HolyL. (1996). The little Czech and the great Czech nation: National identity and the post-communist social transformation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HortonJ.RandD. G.ZeckhauserR. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14, 399-425.
20.
JettenJ.WohlM. J. A. (2012). The past as a determinant of the present: Historical continuity, collective angst, and opposition to immigration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 442-450.
21.
KlarY.Schori-EyalN.KlarY. (2013). The “never again” state of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 125-143.
22.
Klein-HaleviY. (2011, October12). Everyone’s son: A new read on Jewish life. Tablet. Available from http://www.tabletmag.com
23.
KohlP. L.FawcettC. (Eds.). (1995). Nationalism, politics and the practice of archeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
KusL.WardC.LiuJ. (2014). Interethnic factors as predictors of the subjective well-being of minority individuals in a context of recent societal changes. Political Psychology, 35, 703-719.
LiuJ. H.HiltonD. J. (2005). How the past weighs on the present: Social representations of history and their role in identity politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 1-21.
27.
MoscoviciS. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250.
28.
O’LearyC. E. (1999). To die for: The paradox of American patriotism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867-872.
30.
OrehekE.SasotaJ.KruglanskiA. W.DechesneM.RidgewayL. (2014). Interdependent self-construals mitigate the fear of death and augment the willingness to become a martyr. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 265-275.
31.
Radcliffe-BrownA. R. (1945). Religion and society. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 75, 33-43.
32.
ReicherS.HopkinsN. (2001). Self and nation. London, England: SAGE.
33.
RoccasS.ElsterA. (2012). Group identities. In TroppL. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 107-122). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the ingroup’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711.
35.
RoccasS.SagivL.SchwartzS.HalevyN.EidelsonR. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280-306.
36.
SaniF.HerreraM.BoweM. (2009). Perceived collective continuity and ingroup identification as defense against death awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 242-245.
37.
SaniM.BoweM.HerreraC.MannaT.CossaX.MiaoX.ZhouY. (2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1118-1134.
38.
SmithA. D. (2003). Chosen peoples: Sacred sources of national identity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
SwannW. B.Jr.GómezA.DovidioJ.HartS.JettenJ. (2010). Dying and killing for one’s group: Identity fusion moderates responses to intergroup versions of the trolley problem. Psychological Science, 21, 1176-1183.
40.
TajfelH. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
42.
TriandisH. C.GelfandM. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 118-128.
43.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
44.
Van de SchootR.LugtigP.HoxJ. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486-492.
45.
Van VugtM.HartC. M. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 585-598.
46.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R. (2008). Collective angst: How threats to the future vitality of the ingroup shape intergroup emotion. In WaymentH.BauerJ. (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 171-181). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R. (2009). Group threat, collective angst and ingroup forgiveness for the war in Iraq. Political Psychology, 30, 193-217.
48.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R.ReysenS. (2010). Perceiving your group’s future to be in jeopardy: Extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 898-910.
49.
ZdaniukB.LevineJ. M. (2001). Group loyalty: Impact of members’ identification and contributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 502-509.
50.
ZerubavelY. (1995). Recovered roots: Collective memory and the making of Israeli national tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
